News Realms Remove Ads - Go Premium! Sign In or Register

Bluetracker

Tracks Blizzard employees across various accounts.

Kazakusan is good for the game. But its current iteration isn't. What I never see discussed is how its the easiest card in the history of standard to make adjustments to. You can remove/tweak the treasures endlessly until you hit the sweet spot for it. https://t.co/jbSZR7Yu1N

Kazakusan is good for the game. But its current iteration isn't. What I never see discussed is how its the easiest card in the history of standard to make adjustments to. You can remove/tweak the treasures endlessly until you hit the sweet spot for it. https://t.co/jbSZR7Yu1N

  • HS_Orange
    Posted 3 years, 6 months ago (Source)
    Kazakusan is good for the game. But its current iteration isn't. What I never see discussed is how its the easiest card in the history of standard to make adjustments to. You can remove/tweak the treasures endlessly until you hit the sweet spot for it. https://t.co/jbSZR7Yu1N

    • HS_Orange
      Posted 3 years, 6 months ago (Source)
      When you realising that its pretty easy to just remove, or nerf depending on what route they decide to go, the treasures that make the card feel really unfair its hard to imagine it being bad for the game longterm. Right now I think Locust is the most obvious one that needs to go

      • HS_Orange
        Posted 3 years, 6 months ago (Source)
        ... also Im convinced the people who say that no changes are necessary to Kazakusan are the same people who thought un-nerfed Irondeep Trogg was good for the game 🤭

        • HS_Orange
          Posted 3 years, 6 months ago (Source)
          AND LAST THING!! DONT LET KAZAKUSAN DISTRACT YOU FROM THE REAL CULPRIT; GUFF!!!! 😡😡😡

          • Iksar
            Posted 3 years, 6 months ago (Source)
            @HS_Orange Doesn't like Kazakusan...ok ok Doesn't love Guff... 😡🤬👿
Tweet