Bluetracker

Tracks Blizzard employees across various accounts.

@Tabayrak any chance we can see changes to Pool 2 ATN? It's dramatically worse than RTT in many cases and does less than other mana reduction passives (e.g. affinity, endurance training); it really feels bad to be offered ATN/Signet/bad third when RTT is so much stronger

@Tabayrak any chance we can see changes to Pool 2 ATN? It's dramatically worse than RTT in many cases and does less than other mana reduction passives (e.g. affinity, endurance training); it really feels bad to be offered ATN/Signet/bad third when RTT is so much stronger

jjjjjj_wildhs

Posted 3 years, 6 months ago (Source)

@Tabayrak any chance we can see changes to Pool 2 ATN? It's dramatically worse than RTT in many cases and does less than other mana reduction passives (e.g. affinity, endurance training); it really feels bad to be offered ATN/Signet/bad third when RTT is so much stronger

jrhsk8

Posted 3 years, 6 months ago (Source)

@jjjjjj_wildhs @Tabayrak I think it could use a buff to stay in pool 2, maybe costs 1 less with no minimum? I don't even know if that's good enough but it would be a start

Tabayrak

Posted 3 years, 6 months ago (Source)

@jrhsk8 @jjjjjj_wildhs So some of our thoughts on ATN. Back when we moved ATN to pool 2 we looked at the data, simply performing as well as pool 2 treasures. So currently we are keeping a pulse on its performance before we make any adjustments.

jrhsk8

Posted 3 years, 6 months ago (Source)

@Tabayrak @jjjjjj_wildhs Understandable, but could the data be affected by the powerful synergies it had with other pool 2's at the time? Or that it was *the* pick for a lot of the decks that were going to do well anyway. Feel-wise it's absolute garbo in tier 2 right now, I've never picked it once

Tabayrak

Posted 3 years, 6 months ago (Source)

@jrhsk8 @jjjjjj_wildhs It absolutely could have been. That is one of the reasons we have been sitting on it we are waiting for it to settle a bit.

CroqueHs

Posted 3 years, 6 months ago (Source)

@Tabayrak @jrhsk8 @jjjjjj_wildhs I lost to ATN earlier so it must be GigaOP

Tabayrak

Posted 3 years, 6 months ago (Source)

@CroqueHs @jrhsk8 @jjjjjj_wildhs There it is.

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@Tabayrak any chance we can see changes to Pool 2 ATN? It's dramatically worse than RTT in many cases and does less than other mana reduction passives (e.g. affinity, endurance training); it really feels bad to be offered ATN/Signet/bad third when RTT is so much stronger (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1496534317706665990">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@jjjjjj_wildhs @Tabayrak I think it could use a buff to stay in pool 2, maybe costs 1 less with no minimum? I don't even know if that's good enough but it would be a start (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1496534960412504070">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@jrhsk8 @jjjjjj_wildhs So some of our thoughts on ATN. Back when we moved ATN to pool 2 we looked at the data, simply performing as well as pool 2 treasures. So currently we are keeping a pulse on its performance before we make any adjustments. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1496538866698039297">Tabayrak</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@Tabayrak @jjjjjj_wildhs Understandable, but could the data be affected by the powerful synergies it had with other pool 2's at the time? Or that it was *the* pick for a lot of the decks that were going to do well anyway. Feel-wise it's absolute garbo in tier 2 right now, I've never picked it once (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1496540123810656257">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@jrhsk8 @jjjjjj_wildhs It absolutely could have been. That is one of the reasons we have been sitting on it we are waiting for it to settle a bit. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1496541252158107648">Tabayrak</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@Tabayrak @jrhsk8 @jjjjjj_wildhs I lost to ATN earlier so it must be GigaOP (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1496548210671763458">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@CroqueHs @jrhsk8 @jjjjjj_wildhs There it is. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1496559383790166036">Tabayrak</a>)
<hr/>

Tweet

@Tabayrak any chance we can see changes to Pool 2 ATN? It's dramatically worse than RTT in many cases and does less than other mana reduction passives (e.g. affinity, endurance training); it really feels bad to be offered ATN/Signet/bad third when RTT is so much stronger

@jjjjjj_wildhs @Tabayrak I think it could use a buff to stay in pool 2, maybe costs 1 less with no minimum? I don't even know if that's good enough but it would be a start

@jrhsk8 @jjjjjj_wildhs So some of our thoughts on ATN. Back when we moved ATN to pool 2 we looked at the data, simply performing as well as pool 2 treasures. So currently we are keeping a pulse on its performance before we make any adjustments. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1496538866698039297">Source</a>)

@Tabayrak @jjjjjj_wildhs Understandable, but could the data be affected by the powerful synergies it had with other pool 2's at the time? Or that it was *the* pick for a lot of the decks that were going to do well anyway. Feel-wise it's absolute garbo in tier 2 right now, I've never picked it once

@jrhsk8 @jjjjjj_wildhs It absolutely could have been. That is one of the reasons we have been sitting on it we are waiting for it to settle a bit. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1496541252158107648">Source</a>)

@Tabayrak @jrhsk8 @jjjjjj_wildhs I lost to ATN earlier so it must be GigaOP

@CroqueHs @jrhsk8 @jjjjjj_wildhs There it is. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1496559383790166036">Source</a>)
 
 <hr/>