Bluetracker

Tracks Blizzard employees across various accounts.

Uhhh… https://t.co/LaZuFsqv4J

Uhhh… https://t.co/LaZuFsqv4J

hsdecktech

Posted 3 years, 9 months ago (Source)

Uhhh… https://t.co/LaZuFsqv4J

Chadd Nervigg

Posted 3 years, 9 months ago (Source)

@hsdecktech Got a translation for non-law-twitter?

hsdecktech

Posted 3 years, 9 months ago (Source)

@Celestalon I haven’t read the opinion yet, but assuming OP is faithfully explaining it: cops can just get internet activity, without warrant or anything, if that person agreed to TOS that say they agree their data will be provided in cooperation with law enforcement (like all TOS do).

Chadd Nervigg

Posted 3 years, 9 months ago (Source)

@hsdecktech Ah, I see.

hsdecktech

Posted 3 years, 9 months ago (Source)

@Celestalon Actually, might not be as bad as I initially thought. This looks like just a gov request to preserve the info, probably still need a warrant to access. The lack of analysis and reliance on TOS are a little shocking, but I’m no longer freaking out.

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
Uhhh… https://t.co/LaZuFsqv4J (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1519530601820393472">hsdecktech</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@hsdecktech Got a translation for non-law-twitter? (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1519531270367170561">Chadd Nervigg</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@Celestalon I haven’t read the opinion yet, but assuming OP is faithfully explaining it: cops can just get internet activity, without warrant or anything, if that person agreed to TOS that say they agree their data will be provided in cooperation with law enforcement (like all TOS do). (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1519531987119538176">hsdecktech</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@hsdecktech Ah, I see. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1519532672606818304">Chadd Nervigg</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@Celestalon Actually, might not be as bad as I initially thought. This looks like just a gov request to preserve the info, probably still need a warrant to access. The lack of analysis and reliance on TOS are a little shocking, but I’m no longer freaking out. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1519533841915924480">hsdecktech</a>)
<hr/>

Tweet

Uhhh… https://t.co/LaZuFsqv4J (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1519530601820393472">Source</a>)

@hsdecktech Got a translation for non-law-twitter? (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1519531270367170561">Source</a>)

@Celestalon I haven’t read the opinion yet, but assuming OP is faithfully explaining it: cops can just get internet activity, without warrant or anything, if that person agreed to TOS that say they agree their data will be provided in cooperation with law enforcement (like all TOS do). (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1519531987119538176">Source</a>)

@hsdecktech Ah, I see. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1519532672606818304">Source</a>)

@Celestalon Actually, might not be as bad as I initially thought. This looks like just a gov request to preserve the info, probably still need a warrant to access. The lack of analysis and reliance on TOS are a little shocking, but I’m no longer freaking out. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1519533841915924480">Source</a>)
 
 <hr/>