Bluetracker

Tracks Blizzard employees across various accounts.

Many Chinese players believe the cards were played could influence the passive you got. Now there are many debates about this in community and some people spend a lot of time to test the theory. could you clarify this, hope they spend the time on make new deck.@Tabayrak

Many Chinese players believe the cards were played could influence the passive you got. Now there are many debates about this in community and some people spend a lot of time to test the theory. could you clarify this, hope they spend the time on make new deck.@Tabayrak

andyguoa

Posted 4 years ago (Source)

Many Chinese players believe the cards were played could influence the passive you got. Now there are many debates about this in community and some people spend a lot of time to test the theory. could you clarify this, hope they spend the time on make new deck.@Tabayrak

fusrohdaniel

Posted 4 years ago (Source)

@andyguoa @Tabayrak Cool theory. Not true at all but a really cool theory. I can see why it caught on.

Tabayrak

Posted 4 years ago (Source)

@fusrohdaniel @andyguoa https://t.co/8gMqALfEzi
jrz_oyu

Posted 4 years ago (Source)

@fusrohdaniel @Tabayrak Is there a way to reduce the use of spells to reduce the passivity of related artifacts? For example, do not use fire spell cards to reduce the probability of fire spell treasure.

Tabayrak

Posted 4 years ago (Source)

@jrz_oyu @fusrohdaniel https://t.co/s437SbWqGs
jrz_oyu

Posted 4 years ago (Source)

@fusrohdaniel @Tabayrak Since playing cards does not affect passive treasure, or not playing cards cannot avoid unwanted treasure. Why have the probability rules for passive treasure been apparently modified in recent days?

Tabayrak

Posted 4 years ago (Source)

@jrz_oyu @fusrohdaniel We don't want to expose the exact method how to fish out treasures I hope you understand. But the system had not been changed recently so if you seeing something wierd let me know :)

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
Many Chinese players believe the cards were played could influence the passive you got. Now there are many debates about this in community and some people spend a lot of time to test the theory. could you clarify this, hope they spend the time on make new deck.@Tabayrak (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1532641366974402561">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@andyguoa @Tabayrak Cool theory. Not true at all but a really cool theory. I can see why it caught on. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1532726191202766848">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@fusrohdaniel @andyguoa https://t.co/8gMqALfEzi (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1532764622213615619">Tabayrak</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@fusrohdaniel @Tabayrak Is there a way to reduce the use of spells to reduce the passivity of related artifacts? For example, do not use fire spell cards to reduce the probability of fire spell treasure. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1532931377393328128">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@jrz_oyu @fusrohdaniel https://t.co/s437SbWqGs (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1532933067127476224">Tabayrak</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@fusrohdaniel @Tabayrak Since playing cards does not affect passive treasure, or not playing cards cannot avoid unwanted treasure. Why have the probability rules for passive treasure been apparently modified in recent days? (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1533299535010619392">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@jrz_oyu @fusrohdaniel We don't want to expose the exact method how to fish out treasures I hope you understand. But the system had not been changed recently so if you seeing something wierd let me know :) (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1533332675313840128">Tabayrak</a>)
<hr/>

Tweet

Many Chinese players believe the cards were played could influence the passive you got. Now there are many debates about this in community and some people spend a lot of time to test the theory. could you clarify this, hope they spend the time on make new deck.@Tabayrak

@andyguoa @Tabayrak Cool theory. Not true at all but a really cool theory. I can see why it caught on.

@fusrohdaniel @andyguoa https://t.co/8gMqALfEzi (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1532764622213615619">Source</a>)

@fusrohdaniel @Tabayrak Is there a way to reduce the use of spells to reduce the passivity of related artifacts? For example, do not use fire spell cards to reduce the probability of fire spell treasure.

@jrz_oyu @fusrohdaniel https://t.co/s437SbWqGs (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1532933067127476224">Source</a>)

@fusrohdaniel @Tabayrak Since playing cards does not affect passive treasure, or not playing cards cannot avoid unwanted treasure. Why have the probability rules for passive treasure been apparently modified in recent days?

@jrz_oyu @fusrohdaniel We don't want to expose the exact method how to fish out treasures I hope you understand. But the system had not been changed recently so if you seeing something wierd let me know :) (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1533332675313840128">Source</a>)
 
 <hr/>