Bluetracker

Tracks Blizzard employees across various accounts.

Apparently what that senator in my previous tweet might have been meaning was "Overturning long-standing precedent can be good. Look at how Brown (which ended racial segregation) overturned Plessy (which allowed for racial segregation)." Appreciate the clarifications.

Apparently what that senator in my previous tweet might have been meaning was "Overturning long-standing precedent can be good. Look at how Brown (which ended racial segregation) overturned Plessy (which allowed for racial segregation)." Appreciate the clarifications.

Chadd Nervigg

Posted 3 years, 8 months ago (Source)

Apparently what that senator in my previous tweet might have been meaning was "Overturning long-standing precedent can be good. Look at how Brown (which ended racial segregation) overturned Plessy (which allowed for racial segregation)." Appreciate the clarifications.

Its_Immanis

Posted 3 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@Celestalon He's right that overturning precedent can be a good thing, but wrong in equating equality to removing something that guarantees the right for women to make their own informed medical decisions with their physicians.

Chadd Nervigg

Posted 3 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@Its_Immanis Preaching to the choir, we're on the same side of that issue. I'm merely recognizing that I misinterpreted what that senator's argument was.

Caaethil

Posted 3 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@Celestalon I think that's what he was getting at yeah, with bad word choice. But "precedent > all" is not what Obama was getting at so it's a clumsy and bad faith comparison either way. Guy is still a ghoul arguing in favour of this decision so its w/e, but good to have facts straight.

Chadd Nervigg

Posted 3 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@Caaethil Agreed across the board.

themattlondon

Posted 3 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@Celestalon So he’s a bigoted dumbass but in that tweet he was being just a dumbass. Got it.

Chadd Nervigg

Posted 3 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@themattlondon Exactly. I think he’s evil either way, but I’d rather hate a guy for the bad things he did say, not the bad things he *didn’t* say. Important distinction for me, even@though the result is the same.

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
Apparently what that senator in my previous tweet might have been meaning was "Overturning long-standing precedent can be good. Look at how Brown (which ended racial segregation) overturned Plessy (which allowed for racial segregation)."

Appreciate the clarifications. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1540784432763641857">Chadd Nervigg</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@Celestalon He's right that overturning precedent can be a good thing, but wrong in equating equality to removing something that guarantees the right for women to make their own informed medical decisions with their physicians. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1540785351840567296">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@Its_Immanis Preaching to the choir, we're on the same side of that issue. I'm merely recognizing that I misinterpreted what that senator's argument was. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1540785840351088640">Chadd Nervigg</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@Celestalon I think that's what he was getting at yeah, with bad word choice. But "precedent > all" is not what Obama was getting at so it's a clumsy and bad faith comparison either way.

Guy is still a ghoul arguing in favour of this decision so its w/e, but good to have facts straight. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1540788472935550976">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@Caaethil Agreed across the board. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1540788686945546240">Chadd Nervigg</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@Celestalon So he’s a bigoted dumbass but in that tweet he was being just a dumbass. Got it. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1540804172156510209">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@themattlondon Exactly. I think he’s evil either way, but I’d rather hate a guy for the bad things he did say, not the bad things he *didn’t* say. Important distinction for me, even@though the result is the same. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1540806396190400513">Chadd Nervigg</a>)
<hr/>

Tweet

Apparently what that senator in my previous tweet might have been meaning was "Overturning long-standing precedent can be good. Look at how Brown (which ended racial segregation) overturned Plessy (which allowed for racial segregation)."

Appreciate the clarifications. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1540784432763641857">Source</a>)

@Celestalon He's right that overturning precedent can be a good thing, but wrong in equating equality to removing something that guarantees the right for women to make their own informed medical decisions with their physicians.

@Its_Immanis Preaching to the choir, we're on the same side of that issue. I'm merely recognizing that I misinterpreted what that senator's argument was. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1540785840351088640">Source</a>)
 
 <hr/>

@Celestalon I think that's what he was getting at yeah, with bad word choice. But "precedent &gt; all" is not what Obama was getting at so it's a clumsy and bad faith comparison either way.

Guy is still a ghoul arguing in favour of this decision so its w/e, but good to have facts straight.

@Caaethil Agreed across the board. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1540788686945546240">Source</a>)
 
 <hr/>

@Celestalon So he’s a bigoted dumbass but in that tweet he was being just a dumbass. Got it.

@themattlondon Exactly. I think he’s evil either way, but I’d rather hate a guy for the bad things he did say, not the bad things he *didn’t* say. Important distinction for me, even@though the result is the same. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1540806396190400513">Source</a>)
 
 <hr/>