Bluetracker

Tracks Blizzard employees across various accounts.

Prince Renathal exercise: if you could remove cards from your starting deck at -1 life or add them at +1 life per card, what would the best decks tend to look like? My guess is that the 20/20 decks work way better than the 40/40 ones. So where do you suppose the 30/30 reside?

Prince Renathal exercise: if you could remove cards from your starting deck at -1 life or add them at +1 life per card, what would the best decks tend to look like? My guess is that the 20/20 decks work way better than the 40/40 ones. So where do you suppose the 30/30 reside?

J_Alexander_HS

Posted 3 years, 7 months ago (Source)

Prince Renathal exercise: if you could remove cards from your starting deck at -1 life or add them at +1 life per card, what would the best decks tend to look like? My guess is that the 20/20 decks work way better than the 40/40 ones. So where do you suppose the 30/30 reside?

Iksar

Posted 3 years, 7 months ago (Source)

@J_Alexander_HS I'm honestly not sure. If I had to guess, I'd say 40/40 decks are best in most metas. From time to time there would probably be a 20/20 deck that is early game combo-y enough the trade-off is worth it.

Iksar

Posted 3 years, 7 months ago (Source)

@J_Alexander_HS Before this card, we had floated the idea of having an event where players could choose the number of cards in their deck they wanted and have health to match. Might still do it at some point. Might have to restrict the maximum to 60 or 70.

<blockquote class="quoted">
    
</blockquote>
Prince Renathal exercise: if you could remove cards from your starting deck at -1 life or add them at +1 life per card, what would the best decks tend to look like?

My guess is that the 20/20 decks work way better than the 40/40 ones. So where do you suppose the 30/30 reside? (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1541605458804256768">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
    
</blockquote>
@J_Alexander_HS I'm honestly not sure. If I had to guess, I'd say 40/40 decks are best in most metas. From time to time there would probably be a 20/20 deck that is early game combo-y enough the trade-off is worth it. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1541680620203429888">Iksar</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
    
</blockquote>
@J_Alexander_HS Before this card, we had floated the idea of having an event where players could choose the number of cards in their deck they wanted and have health to match. Might still do it at some point. Might have to restrict the maximum to 60 or 70. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1541680961661829121">Iksar</a>)
<hr/>

Bluetracker

Prince Renathal exercise: if you could remove cards from your starting deck at -1 life or add them at +1 life per card, what would the best decks tend to look like? My guess is that the 20/20 decks work way better than the 40/40 ones. So where do you suppose the 30/30 reside?

Tweet