Bluetracker

Tracks Blizzard employees across various accounts.

@AlecoGereco I love what you're doing right now with many buffs per patch. This is what I've always wanted and I'll be praising you for it every single time. But for me to enjoy the game, I need to see more wild balance changes (1/4)

@AlecoGereco I love what you're doing right now with many buffs per patch. This is what I've always wanted and I'll be praising you for it every single time. But for me to enjoy the game, I need to see more wild balance changes (1/4)

imik_plays

Posted 3 years, 5 months ago (Source)

@AlecoGereco I love what you're doing right now with many buffs per patch. This is what I've always wanted and I'll be praising you for it every single time. But for me to enjoy the game, I need to see more wild balance changes (1/4)

Aleco Gereco

Posted 3 years, 5 months ago (Source)

@imik_plays Hey Imik, really appreciate the thoughtful messages here :) I hear you that there is a strong desire for a bigger, maintenance-level patch to wild which hits some of the more frustrating interactions. I think a patch like that could make the wild community really happy, but 1/x

Aleco Gereco

Posted 3 years, 5 months ago (Source)

@imik_plays I likely wouldn't be the person to own that kind of patch (@themattlondon? thoughts?). If we were do a big patch like that, it'd likely be done separately from these regular balance patches that are focused on standard. 2/x

Aleco Gereco

Posted 3 years, 5 months ago (Source)

@imik_plays @themattlondon These smaller changes (like Kobold Illusionist) are happening in these patches because they're very low scope for us to include and largely feel like free wins for the format. We're very likely to keep doing these small scope changes, but big scope patches are more difficult.

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@AlecoGereco I love what you're doing right now with many buffs per patch. This is what I've always wanted and I'll be praising you for it every single time.

But for me to enjoy the game, I need to see more wild balance changes (1/4) (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1559592390838681601">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@imik_plays Hey Imik, really appreciate the thoughtful messages here :)

I hear you that there is a strong desire for a bigger, maintenance-level patch to wild which hits some of the more frustrating interactions. I think a patch like that could make the wild community really happy, but 1/x (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1559633925470691328">Aleco Gereco</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@imik_plays I likely wouldn't be the person to own that kind of patch (@themattlondon? thoughts?). If we were do a big patch like that, it'd likely be done separately from these regular balance patches that are focused on standard. 2/x (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1559634353256218626">Aleco Gereco</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@imik_plays @themattlondon These smaller changes (like Kobold Illusionist) are happening in these patches because they're very low scope for us to include and largely feel like free wins for the format. We're very likely to keep doing these small scope changes, but big scope patches are more difficult. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1559635011355037697">Aleco Gereco</a>)
<hr/>

Tweet

@AlecoGereco I love what you're doing right now with many buffs per patch. This is what I've always wanted and I'll be praising you for it every single time.

But for me to enjoy the game, I need to see more wild balance changes (1/4)

@imik_plays Hey Imik, really appreciate the thoughtful messages here :)

I hear you that there is a strong desire for a bigger, maintenance-level patch to wild which hits some of the more frustrating interactions. I think a patch like that could make the wild community really happy, but 1/x (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1559633925470691328">Source</a>)

@imik_plays I likely wouldn't be the person to own that kind of patch (@themattlondon? thoughts?). If we were do a big patch like that, it'd likely be done separately from these regular balance patches that are focused on standard. 2/x (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1559634353256218626">Source</a>)

@imik_plays @themattlondon These smaller changes (like Kobold Illusionist) are happening in these patches because they're very low scope for us to include and largely feel like free wins for the format. We're very likely to keep doing these small scope changes, but big scope patches are more difficult. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1559635011355037697">Source</a>)
 
 <hr/>