Bluetracker

Tracks Blizzard employees across various accounts.

The legendary is cool and all...but weren't cards supposed to be revealed in packages? A 2-card "package" of an aggro card and a value card doesn't really make sense @alkali_layke https://t.co/pc1n2UX4af

The legendary is cool and all...but weren't cards supposed to be revealed in packages? A 2-card "package" of an aggro card and a value card doesn't really make sense @alkali_layke https://t.co/pc1n2UX4af

TonberryBleu

Posted 3 years, 1 month ago (Source)

The legendary is cool and all...but weren't cards supposed to be revealed in packages? A 2-card "package" of an aggro card and a value card doesn't really make sense @alkali_layke https://t.co/pc1n2UX4af

Alkali Layke

Posted 3 years, 1 month ago (Source)

@TonberryBleu Some groupings of cards are small. Some are large. It's what made the most sense to us when we put everything together. Please wait until reveals are over and if you have a better suggestion then on how we did things please let us know

TonberryBleu

Posted 3 years, 1 month ago (Source)

@alkali_layke Okay, totally understand - this sounds more like a design question then as opposed to a reveal strategy question. Given the clarity that you provided on how your team wanted to showcase card packages, whether big or small, were there no other new card(s) that fit with Svalna?

Alkali Layke

Posted 3 years, 1 month ago (Source)

@TonberryBleu That would involve discussing new cards... which you'll see by then end of the reveals. 😎 Enjoy.

TonberryBleu

Posted 3 years, 1 month ago (Source)

@alkali_layke Was this not specifically what the team was trying to improve on with the reveal season, per Celestalon's tweet below? Every other class reveal has shown 4 - 5 synergistic cards, why is the approach different with Svalna? https://t.co/GG6Myg9lRX

Chadd Nervigg

Posted 3 years, 1 month ago (Source)

@TonberryBleu @alkali_layke Priest just didn't fit into two even-sized buckets. We have several one-off or two-off cards in the set; cards that aren't really intended to be a whole archetype, but support for other decks. That's Svalna. The remaining 8 Priest cards are basically one large package.

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
The legendary is cool and all...but weren't cards supposed to be revealed in packages? A 2-card "package" of an aggro card and a value card doesn't really make sense @alkali_layke https://t.co/pc1n2UX4af (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1594361035745792004">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@TonberryBleu Some groupings of cards are small. Some are large. It's what made the most sense to us when we put everything together. Please wait until reveals are over and if you have a better suggestion then on how we did things please let us know (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1594374329277755392">Alkali Layke</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@alkali_layke Okay, totally understand - this sounds more like a design question then as opposed to a reveal strategy question. Given the clarity that you provided on how your team wanted to showcase card packages, whether big or small, were there no other new card(s) that fit with Svalna? (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1594381453181452288">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@TonberryBleu That would involve discussing new cards... which you'll see by then end of the reveals. 😎 Enjoy. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1594383833738096641">Alkali Layke</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@alkali_layke Was this not specifically what the team was trying to improve on with the reveal season, per Celestalon's tweet below? Every other class reveal has shown 4 - 5 synergistic cards, why is the approach different with Svalna? https://t.co/GG6Myg9lRX (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1594650687677386758">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@TonberryBleu @alkali_layke Priest just didn't fit into two even-sized buckets. We have several one-off or two-off cards in the set; cards that aren't really intended to be a whole archetype, but support for other decks. That's Svalna. The remaining 8 Priest cards are basically one large package. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1594651549824737283">Chadd Nervigg</a>)
<hr/>

Tweet

The legendary is cool and all...but weren't cards supposed to be revealed in packages? A 2-card "package" of an aggro card and a value card doesn't really make sense @alkali_layke https://t.co/pc1n2UX4af

@TonberryBleu Some groupings of cards are small. Some are large. It's what made the most sense to us when we put everything together. Please wait until reveals are over and if you have a better suggestion then on how we did things please let us know (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1594374329277755392">Source</a>)

@alkali_layke Okay, totally understand - this sounds more like a design question then as opposed to a reveal strategy question. Given the clarity that you provided on how your team wanted to showcase card packages, whether big or small, were there no other new card(s) that fit with Svalna?

@TonberryBleu That would involve discussing new cards... which you'll see by then end of the reveals. 😎 Enjoy. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1594383833738096641">Source</a>)

@alkali_layke Was this not specifically what the team was trying to improve on with the reveal season, per Celestalon's tweet below? Every other class reveal has shown 4 - 5 synergistic cards, why is the approach different with Svalna? https://t.co/GG6Myg9lRX

@TonberryBleu @alkali_layke Priest just didn't fit into two even-sized buckets. We have several one-off or two-off cards in the set; cards that aren't really intended to be a whole archetype, but support for other decks. That's Svalna. The remaining 8 Priest cards are basically one large package. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1594651549824737283">Source</a>)
 
 <hr/>