Bluetracker

Tracks Blizzard employees across various accounts.

But you didn't answer my Arcane Hunter question, as I said you would. I understand Arcane Hunter is not an easy topic to talk about, so it's all cool. https://t.co/Gm3nyZRoL8

But you didn't answer my Arcane Hunter question, as I said you would. I understand Arcane Hunter is not an easy topic to talk about, so it's all cool. https://t.co/Gm3nyZRoL8

hattri_k

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

But you didn't answer my Arcane Hunter question, as I said you would. I understand Arcane Hunter is not an easy topic to talk about, so it's all cool. https://t.co/Gm3nyZRoL8

adam_noodelman

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@hattri_k I think hunter overall is gonna be fine. No class has all their packages land. Big beast looks like it will still be viable and pretty different from what it was before

hattri_k

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@adam_noodelman Cool. Do you like Arcane Hunter? Because that tweet is about Arcane Hunter, you may didn't notice

adam_noodelman

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@hattri_k No. It's one of those packages that whiffed. There's not much to justify. Every class has had packages like that. I can give examples for most classes just from this year's sets

hattri_k

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@adam_noodelman I agree with you! Why do you think they don't print support for an archetype that wasn't successful at all?

adam_noodelman

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@hattri_k Sometimes it's simply better to cut one's losses. Every class has those abandoned packages

hattri_k

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@adam_noodelman Listen, homie, what you're missing here is that ARCANE Hunter, as an idea💡is something that sounds bad even before starting to work on it. If it was a last minute idea to fill the set for the expansion we should be told.

adam_noodelman

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@hattri_k But so does multi spell school shaman, fire warrior, murloc warlock, there's so many of these throughout hearthstone. Sometimes they wanna try something way out there for a class that's already strong like hunter was and arguably is

Chadd Nervigg

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@adam_noodelman @hattri_k Arcane Hunter is an awesome archetype, was planned from the start, and I'm glad we did it. Just because an archetype doesn't end up "Tier 1" doesn't mean it was a failure or bad for the game. It's fun, it's flavorful, and it's got potential.

hattri_k

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@Celestalon @adam_noodelman First of all, thank you so much for answering, no one has done it since I first asked last expansion start. It's not like it wasn't Tier 1, it's more like it didn't stand a chance to be a thing. If it was your bet, then why do you suddenly decide to not support it? 🧐 1/2

hattri_k

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@Celestalon @adam_noodelman Also, fun is subjective, but I wouldn't say Arcane Hunter is the definition of fun. Not in my book at least. Wild seeds are fun, for example. Lastly, why does the archetype have anti sinergy between fast rider and Halduron? Why not make Halduron buff hand and deck? 🧐

Chadd Nervigg

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@hattri_k @adam_noodelman You've got a lot of incorrect assumptions here. It's fun for many. It absolutely stood a chance. We are supporting it. Halduron wasn't also a handbuff, to limit surprise targeted burst.

SidisiTV

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@Celestalon @hattri_k @adam_noodelman I personally love Eversong Portal- the animation and the Lynx sounds make me giddy. My buddy @FunkiMonkiHS hit decent ranks playing an Arcane deck too 👀. Maybe we'll find the right meta for Arcane to shine again! Maybe future support would help too 😇 Thank you!

Chadd Nervigg

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@SidisiTV @hattri_k @adam_noodelman @FunkiMonkiHS Yeah, and rotation is a big implication too. Arcane Hunter loses basically nothing in rotation, whereas other decks lose a lot, making it relatively stronger compared to the field.

imik_plays

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@Celestalon @hattri_k @adam_noodelman When I look at the package, there are almost no Arcane spells that you can buff and get a payoff from. Also, only 2 of them can potentially go face, which is probably all right, but I feel like to make the deck interesting, it needs at least a few more supportive spells.🤓💚 https://t.co/sDoKn92uWt

Chadd Nervigg

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@imik_plays @hattri_k @adam_noodelman That's more than a quarter of your deck. That's huge.

Sticowish

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@Celestalon @hattri_k @adam_noodelman So what about Fel Warlock? Did you cut some awesome big Fel Spell cause that just never got anything.

Chadd Nervigg

Posted 2 years, 8 months ago (Source)

@Sticowish @hattri_k @adam_noodelman What about it? Fel is a major common piece of Warlock identity. You can safely expect more Fel cards in Warlock's future.

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
But you didn't answer my Arcane Hunter question, as I said you would. I understand Arcane Hunter is not an easy topic to talk about, so it's all cool. https://t.co/Gm3nyZRoL8 (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641466644504494089">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@hattri_k I think hunter overall is gonna be fine. No class has all their packages land. Big beast looks like it will still be viable and pretty different from what it was before (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641472683421335554">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@adam_noodelman Cool. Do you like Arcane Hunter? Because that tweet is about Arcane Hunter, you may didn't notice (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641475569601634305">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@hattri_k No. It's one of those packages that whiffed. There's not much to justify. Every class has had packages like that. I can give examples for most classes just from this year's sets (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641477555466260481">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@adam_noodelman I agree with you! Why do you think they don't print support for an archetype that wasn't successful at all? (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641484685103575051">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@hattri_k Sometimes it's simply better to cut one's losses. Every class has those abandoned packages (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641485209823576064">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@adam_noodelman Listen, homie, what you're missing here is that ARCANE Hunter, as an idea💡is something that sounds bad even before starting to work on it. If it was a last minute idea to fill the set for the expansion we should be told. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641486240812871683">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@hattri_k But so does multi spell school shaman, fire warrior, murloc warlock, there's so many of these throughout hearthstone. Sometimes they wanna try something way out there for a class that's already strong like hunter was and arguably is (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641492329134534671">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@adam_noodelman @hattri_k Arcane Hunter is an awesome archetype, was planned from the start, and I'm glad we did it. Just because an archetype doesn't end up "Tier 1" doesn't mean it was a failure or bad for the game. It's fun, it's flavorful, and it's got potential. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641501723905916928">Chadd Nervigg</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@Celestalon @adam_noodelman First of all, thank you so much for answering, no one has done it since I first asked last expansion start.

It's not like it wasn't Tier 1, it's more like it didn't stand a chance to be a thing. If it was your bet, then why do you suddenly decide to not support it? 🧐

1/2 (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641503386347421697">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@Celestalon @adam_noodelman Also, fun is subjective, but I wouldn't say Arcane Hunter is the definition of fun. Not in my book at least. Wild seeds are fun, for example.

Lastly, why does the archetype have anti sinergy between fast rider and Halduron? Why not make Halduron buff hand and deck? 🧐 (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641504019997679628">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@hattri_k @adam_noodelman You've got a lot of incorrect assumptions here. It's fun for many. It absolutely stood a chance. We are supporting it. Halduron wasn't also a handbuff, to limit surprise targeted burst. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641506710467776512">Chadd Nervigg</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@Celestalon @hattri_k @adam_noodelman I personally love Eversong Portal- the animation and the Lynx sounds make me giddy.

My buddy @FunkiMonkiHS hit decent ranks playing an Arcane deck too 👀. Maybe we'll find the right meta for Arcane to shine again!

Maybe future support would help too 😇

Thank you! (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641508429888995328">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@SidisiTV @hattri_k @adam_noodelman @FunkiMonkiHS Yeah, and rotation is a big implication too. Arcane Hunter loses basically nothing in rotation, whereas other decks lose a lot, making it relatively stronger compared to the field. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641510752803762176">Chadd Nervigg</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@Celestalon @hattri_k @adam_noodelman When I look at the package, there are almost no Arcane spells that you can buff and get a payoff from. Also, only 2 of them can potentially go face, which is probably all right, but I feel like to make the deck interesting, it needs at least a few more supportive spells.🤓💚 https://t.co/sDoKn92uWt (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641508410670604308">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@imik_plays @hattri_k @adam_noodelman That's more than a quarter of your deck. That's huge. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641509309615058945">Chadd Nervigg</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@Celestalon @hattri_k @adam_noodelman So what about Fel Warlock? Did you cut some awesome big Fel Spell cause that just never got anything. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641506954777354251">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@Sticowish @hattri_k @adam_noodelman What about it? Fel is a major common piece of Warlock identity. You can safely expect more Fel cards in Warlock's future. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641507661563977728">Chadd Nervigg</a>)
<hr/>

Tweet

But you didn't answer my Arcane Hunter question, as I said you would. I understand Arcane Hunter is not an easy topic to talk about, so it's all cool. https://t.co/Gm3nyZRoL8

@hattri_k I think hunter overall is gonna be fine. No class has all their packages land. Big beast looks like it will still be viable and pretty different from what it was before

@adam_noodelman Cool. Do you like Arcane Hunter? Because that tweet is about Arcane Hunter, you may didn't notice

@hattri_k No. It's one of those packages that whiffed. There's not much to justify. Every class has had packages like that. I can give examples for most classes just from this year's sets

@adam_noodelman I agree with you! Why do you think they don't print support for an archetype that wasn't successful at all?

@hattri_k Sometimes it's simply better to cut one's losses. Every class has those abandoned packages

@adam_noodelman Listen, homie, what you're missing here is that ARCANE Hunter, as an idea💡is something that sounds bad even before starting to work on it. If it was a last minute idea to fill the set for the expansion we should be told.

@hattri_k But so does multi spell school shaman, fire warrior, murloc warlock, there's so many of these throughout hearthstone. Sometimes they wanna try something way out there for a class that's already strong like hunter was and arguably is

@adam_noodelman @hattri_k Arcane Hunter is an awesome archetype, was planned from the start, and I'm glad we did it. Just because an archetype doesn't end up "Tier 1" doesn't mean it was a failure or bad for the game. It's fun, it's flavorful, and it's got potential. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641501723905916928">Source</a>)

@Celestalon @adam_noodelman First of all, thank you so much for answering, no one has done it since I first asked last expansion start.

It's not like it wasn't Tier 1, it's more like it didn't stand a chance to be a thing. If it was your bet, then why do you suddenly decide to not support it? 🧐

1/2

@Celestalon @adam_noodelman Also, fun is subjective, but I wouldn't say Arcane Hunter is the definition of fun. Not in my book at least. Wild seeds are fun, for example.

Lastly, why does the archetype have anti sinergy between fast rider and Halduron? Why not make Halduron buff hand and deck? 🧐

@hattri_k @adam_noodelman You've got a lot of incorrect assumptions here. It's fun for many. It absolutely stood a chance. We are supporting it. Halduron wasn't also a handbuff, to limit surprise targeted burst. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641506710467776512">Source</a>)

@Celestalon @hattri_k @adam_noodelman I personally love Eversong Portal- the animation and the Lynx sounds make me giddy.

My buddy @FunkiMonkiHS hit decent ranks playing an Arcane deck too 👀. Maybe we'll find the right meta for Arcane to shine again!

Maybe future support would help too 😇

Thank you!

@SidisiTV @hattri_k @adam_noodelman @FunkiMonkiHS Yeah, and rotation is a big implication too. Arcane Hunter loses basically nothing in rotation, whereas other decks lose a lot, making it relatively stronger compared to the field. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641510752803762176">Source</a>)
 
 <hr/>

@Celestalon @hattri_k @adam_noodelman When I look at the package, there are almost no Arcane spells that you can buff and get a payoff from. Also, only 2 of them can potentially go face, which is probably all right, but I feel like to make the deck interesting, it needs at least a few more supportive spells.🤓💚 https://t.co/sDoKn92uWt

@imik_plays @hattri_k @adam_noodelman That's more than a quarter of your deck. That's huge. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641509309615058945">Source</a>)
 
 <hr/>

@Celestalon @hattri_k @adam_noodelman So what about Fel Warlock? Did you cut some awesome big Fel Spell cause that just never got anything.

@Sticowish @hattri_k @adam_noodelman What about it? Fel is a major common piece of Warlock identity. You can safely expect more Fel cards in Warlock's future. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641507661563977728">Source</a>)
 
 <hr/>