It's a paid version on Vicious Syndicate. Shows the current meta.
https://www.vicioussyndicate.com/gold-vs-live-app/
Hearthstone
•
Posted by
ShawnMichaels
•
Created 5 years, 6 months ago
•
Updated 5 years, 6 months ago
•
Discussion
5 comments
256 views
Comments
It's a paid version on Vicious Syndicate. Shows the current meta.
https://www.vicioussyndicate.com/gold-vs-live-app/
Hunter's win rate is within 2 percentage points of other classes. That in no way makes this "hunterstone". Plus the meta is still adjusting to the changes.
Not to mention the fact that Hunter is non-existent in wild. If you don't like playing against hunter, just go play wild. You won't run into any there.
Posting the paid analysis here.
My lord is that...legal?
Its not like hunters are invincible. Most decks have a decent chance against dragon and highlander hunter.
As pointed out, the difference in win rate is a mere 2%. And the matchup is fairly predictable. They are fairly at the mercy of their draws, and even a semi-decent amount of healing throws them off. If you're really triggered by hunters, just play weapon destruction (which you would anyway because of dhunters), and an odd Dragonmaw Poacher and you more or less solved the dragon hunter riddle.
It is quite normal that an aggro deck (even more if it is the only which didn't receive nerfs) is at the top of the food chain right after a balance patch.