Bluetracker

Tracks Blizzard employees across various accounts.


I think that decks determining passives is just not gonna work out. I think an in between where passives that cant help the deck are eliminated would be much better.(or full revert) Right now i cant rationalize not playing warrior or think a deck that beats it @Tabayrak

I think that decks determining passives is just not gonna work out. I think an in between where passives that cant help the deck are eliminated would be much better.(or full revert) Right now i cant rationalize not playing warrior or think a deck that beats it @Tabayrak

  • TeamAmericaHS

    Posted 4 years, 3 months ago (Source)
    I think that decks determining passives is just not gonna work out. I think an in between where passives that cant help the deck are eliminated would be much better.(or full revert) Right now i cant rationalize not playing warrior or think a deck that beats it @Tabayrak
    • gomezrain

      Posted 4 years, 3 months ago (Source)
      @TeamAmericaHS @Tabayrak Piggybacking because this is one of the only Duels related concerns I see in my feed, but is it intended that I got suggested two Fireshapers? On a Warlock deck no less? https://t.co/n1IkBrleZ2
      • Tabayrak

        Posted 4 years, 3 months ago (Source)
        @gomezrain @TeamAmericaHS Thanks for the report, no you shouldn't be offered the same thing twice.
        • gomezrain

          Posted 4 years, 3 months ago (Source)
          @Tabayrak @TeamAmericaHS Still an issue post-unlocked potentials fix https://t.co/HZV0eUDGRt
          • Tabayrak

            Posted 4 years, 3 months ago (Source)
            @gomezrain @TeamAmericaHS We are aware of the bug and are intending for the fix to go in the next major patch. Also a heads up for duels bugs like this it is supremely helpful to have a screenshot of the deck list.
    • Ranlit_HS

      Posted 4 years, 3 months ago (Source)
      @TeamAmericaHS @Tabayrak idk why so many, after seeing Warrior OP, conclude the root problem is that Passive change... Rlly, Duels is meant to be a “frequent changes” mode. Being able to build my deck around passives made me enjoy Duels MUCH MORE. They just need to often nerf stuff, not change the system
      • Ranlit_HS

        Posted 4 years, 3 months ago (Source)
        @TeamAmericaHS @Tabayrak So if I could give some feedback to @Tabayrak, I’d ask the team to please not revert the passive change. Implementing that algo was already not ez, don’t scrap your amazing work. Duels is meant to be crazy. I should be allowed to tailored my deck around certain treasures <3
        • Ranlit_HS

          Posted 4 years, 3 months ago (Source)
          @TeamAmericaHS @Tabayrak Just make sure that Duels gets continued support, and that if some Passives are too good with certain ideas, change the Passive itself. Or even add new Passives from time to time to encourage more deckbuilding!
          • Tabayrak

            Posted 4 years, 3 months ago (Source)
            @Ranlit_HS @TeamAmericaHS That's kind of the core of it honestly. When we added the last batch of treasures we wanted to try to mitigate the chances of getting a whammy. Sure this has given us wierd picks as a result, (I am looking at you Corrupted Felstone) but it opens up more potential for each class.
    • TeamAmericaHS

      Posted 4 years, 3 months ago (Source)
      definitely really appreciate the continued changes and support duels is getting though.
      • Tabayrak

        Posted 4 years, 3 months ago (Source)
        @TeamAmericaHS Of course! We are monitoring the meta pretty closely. The intent of this system is to empower players to have synergistic decks. I think this does expose some pretty powerful combos and as we continue to move forward we will find ways to mitigate those slam dunk synergies.
        • Tabayrak

          Posted 4 years, 3 months ago (Source)
          @TeamAmericaHS Would that mitigation be a change to the system or a dampening of the combo itself that is a bigger question than I have an answer for at this time.



Tweet