Focused Study - Card Design Competition Discussion Thread
Submitted 3 years, 6 months ago by
ShadowsOfSense
Competition Theme: Focused Study
It's time to really narrow your area of expertise this week - make sure you School everyone at it!
- You must create a minion which has an effect when all spells in your deck are the same School
- We're looking for specific Schools here - "If all spells in your deck are Fire", for example
MathU is back again with another prompt - and this one is asking you to really hit those books!
As always, I can be reached through Discord or here on the site via PM if you have any issues to report.
Competition Phases
Here are the phases of this card design competition
- Submission Phase: Starts on Mon, Jun 14 17:00 EDT (GMT -0400). Runs until Sat, Jun 19 17:00 EDT (GMT -0400)
- Voting Phase: Starts on Sat, Jun 19 17:00 EDT (GMT -0400). Runs until Sun, Jun 20 16:00 EDT (GMT -0400)
- Finalist Phase: Starts on Sun, Jun 20 17:00 EDT (GMT -0400). Runs until Mon, Jun 21 17:00 EDT (GMT -0400)
- Winner Selected: After finalist voting concludes and we validate votes.
Discussion Thread Rules
No thread rules were added to this season. Please populate and manually edit this thread with them.
Leave a Comment
You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign in here.
Competition Theme: Focused Study
It's time to really narrow your area of expertise this week - make sure you School everyone at it!
MathU is back again with another prompt - and this one is asking you to really hit those books!
As always, I can be reached through Discord or here on the site via PM if you have any issues to report.
Competition Phases
Here are the phases of this card design competition
Discussion Thread Rules
No thread rules were added to this season. Please populate and manually edit this thread with them.
Welcome to the site!
This probably needs some fine tuning, but I'm definitely gonna go full Shadow Priest this week. Priest needs a replacement for Shadow Word: Horror in standard, so this is my first idea.
Edit: Had another idea. Which one do you think is better?
I notice I am confused. Something I believe isn't true. How do I know what I think I know?
Harry James Potter-Evans-Verres, hpmor.com
Wow, anchorm4n, I swear I didn't see your cards before making mines, but they both go the same route (even if the execution isn't exactly the same).
EDIT: Changed the cards because previous wording was confusing.
Warlock minion - "Start of Game: If all spells in your deck are Holy, draw them." It's just Renounce Darkness, so now you can play one on turn-2 every time lol
I'm wondering how much I can get away with a School+class combination that doesn't exist. Like a Warrior card that says "If all spells in your deck are Fire". If I put it in a custom expansion, can people imagine the rest? Probably not :(
Couple of ideas this time around. I think the design for the 2nd one is better, but I feel the token needs to be cleared up a bit somehow (do enemies freeze when they attack? after? etc.) The first one better supports the direction Blizzard is taking Frost Mage however.
EDIT: As much as I like the name Zro K'lvin (Zero Kelvin), the name Shiva might be more appropriate with the Shiva's Guard weapon.
Feedback:
Agor can take on multiple different forms, but only if you build your deck with all of your spells being one specific type.
I'm not entirely sure if this would count given and this was something that the staff and I were talking about before the comp started. If this doesn't count, then hopefully it'll at least inspire someone to come up with some new design. If it does count, then all the better and I can use it!
There might be some big power discrepancy in the forms. I originally made this card to be designed as proof-of-concept first and then balance second, but still tried.
Going off of Molten Breath and Ironforge Portal, one can assume that other Fire spells for the Warrior could conceivably include some Armor gain.
Feedback a bit later.
Sorry for spamming but I had yet another idea, it's just such a cool theme. I'd be very thankful if you could help me choose between those three.
I notice I am confused. Something I believe isn't true. How do I know what I think I know?
Harry James Potter-Evans-Verres, hpmor.com
The Legendary is never going to activate because it's not a Shadow Spell itself. Not sure if you can make a 30 Shadow Spell deck anyway...
It's a wording issue. I intended it to work if all your spells belong to the Shadow school.
I see now that the wording I picked is not the most clear, but it makes grammatical sense (in the same way that "if your house only has brown chairs" allows your house to have, I don't know, red tables).
In any case, I edited my original post to use a less confusing wording.
As there are only very few arcane druid spells but a lot of them can be used in combo and meme decks. So this card should help with some early survival.
Feedback
Shadowed Reaper seems like a very solid idea. The amount of minions this hits seems to be pretty big which is the only aspect of the card that I may have some contention with, but this is a good direction to go.
Acolyte of Frost I don't like quite as much. Ignoring the flavor wording (which itself I've never particularly cared for), it doesn't feel like a Mage card to me.
Medivh, the Prophet is a cool recreation of Medivh, but I feel like it possibly does too much stuff.
In a vacuum, the card concept seems interesting. Scary, but interesting. I can already see some potentially game-breaking situations you can do with the card. Mind Blast in particular becomes 25 face damage for 10 mana and no additional set-up (which in itself can become even more with only a single Radiant Elemental).
The card also bears the same problem that Elfinsilver's card has. Pre-FitB watermark, where spell schools did not exist yet.
It's been some time since I tried to enter another contest, but here I am. I think this is eligible, because this edition requires all spells to be of one spell School, but did not specify that the card needed to tell you of which. So this is just a nice, flexible card, akin to Dungeoneers.
"Truth is in the shadows, waiting to be revealed by the light. But light only disperses the shadow." - Me
"If other people shared traits of those considered naive, the world would've become a better place." - Also me
Feedback time:
anchorm4n
Shadowed Reaper is also cool, but it's pretty hard to tell what's going on in the artwork. I'd either zoom in the tauren or use a different art altogether.
Medivh is probably my least favorite of the three.
Lundy
Demonxz95
linkblade91
R
Elfensilver
Besides that, the artwork and the watermark could cost you points.
Neoguli
Cards that work with this effect are: Devour Mind, Thoughtsteal, Seance, Madame Lazul, Shifting Shade, Drakonid Operative, Archbishop Benedictus, Mind Vision, Psionic Probe, and probably others i forgot.
No more Mind Blast otks!
Neoguli
Elfensilver
anchorm4n
I'll boop you
Midway into designing a new card in case Agor wasn't allowed, I actually just then realized that cards had to be minions. So, uh, here's a new card for you guys.
Will likely nerf the cost reduction to 2.
Feedback time, sorry for being a bit late this week. Thanks for your thoughts on my cards!
I notice I am confused. Something I believe isn't true. How do I know what I think I know?
Harry James Potter-Evans-Verres, hpmor.com
Feedback:
Demonxz95 - Said my piece in Discord, but reducing the Cost reduction to 2 might be a good idea. Plus then it's 2s all around; better for memes!
BasilAnguis - The Echo is out of place, as the others have noted. Either it's a Witchwood card and cannot be related to schools, or it's FitB-or-later and cannot have Echo. I like anchor's idea about straight Cost-reduction.
Neoguli - Unfortunately, this will not count for the prompt.
Elfensilver - This reads like a Mage card, as they like the randomly-split damage effects. I like the Druid+Arcane combination, though: there's got to be something there that can be distinctly Druid.
anchorm4n - Acolyte of Frost seems like the most interesting of the bunch. Medivh is too much and the Reaper is just-another Shadow Priest clear card, of which there are many.
R - Definitely go with Combat Dominie; I think that's a potential winner. Only issue could be the recent backlash/nerfs with the Paladin: some people might see this card and its potential with Hand of A'dal and get scared.
Lundy - The first iteration of Zro is the better one, in my opinion. Shiva's Guard is not fully clear, as you noted, and there are only so many ways for the Mage to gain Armor.
Wailor - I like Shai the most: gives you a solid game-plan (blast the enemy while you clear with the Shadow spells), and encourages fun deck-building. Icecaller is fine but might be too annoying, having more Frost Novas, on a body, that you can play twice.
My second attempt. Now it mentions a specific school, but I gave myself a leeway to include more than one school in the text. Don't be confused, though, because all your spells need to be either Shadow or Fel - not both at once.
"Truth is in the shadows, waiting to be revealed by the light. But light only disperses the shadow." - Me
"If other people shared traits of those considered naive, the world would've become a better place." - Also me
It's better late than never. Feedback.
Mage card is better IMO, but I would recommend to find a better art.
I would argue the first part is a lack of imagination, frankly, but yes: the Warrior would need some solid Fire spells for Grimlo to work out. That's the hypothetical I'm proposing. I wanted to create a card that bucks against the established class/school combinations, and see how well that did.
...I'm guessing not well.
I understand it. I also wanted to make that. But some classes lack of spell schools. And its hard to imagine how it would be if there will be some spells of this school. So I made a paladin holy card. Your card is cool btw.
This is the only issue I have with these comps compared to the ones we used to have back in Hearthpwn. Not sure if it's the voting system or that people here are more conservative (in card design, I mean, in the political sense it's quite the opposite xd), but I have the feeling that innovation is usually punished in OoC comps.
It's kinda funny, because my taste has also evolved to adapt this more "strict" environment.
Don't get me wrong, I still prefer what we have here, but I kinda miss submitting a wild idea while not having the feeling that I'm shooting my foot.
For what it's worth, there are some Warrior Fire spells - Molten Breath and Ironforge Portal are both Fire spells. They also have a single Nature spell with Sudden Genesis. (I'm omitting the dual class cards here, which include Holy and Nature spells, but those tags obviously derive from Paladin and Rogue class identities.)
On the one hand, I think Warrior is a poor choice because they're not expected to get much in the way of spell schools - most of their spells represent physical things to mesh with their class identity/WoW abilities. On the other hand, this templating presumably implies that if your deck has no spells, the trigger is activated (akin to the "no duplicates" rules when your deck has zero cards). In that view, your Fire Warrior spell template would be totally valid, but you'd basically be making a card that reads "If your deck contains no spells."
Personally, I like the idea of pushing those boundaries, but I think your ask for people to "imagine the rest" demonstrates where that really belongs: in a Custom Hearthstone Expansion design competition. (Card competitions, I think, ask the designers and judges to imagine a new card added in isolation.) Maybe Out of Cards should try doing something like that once a year, or once competition season, etc. to give people room to play with bigger concepts that require multi-card support.
Or maybe there's room for something smaller in scope that would satisfy this - something like a "Build a custom class package" competition where you'd design something like six cards to support some new archetype. Then we can all see if we can come up with anything better than Freeze Shaman lol.
"Big comps", like full expansions and/or new classes, are on the horizon. They require a lot more groundwork to implement, but it has always been on the to-do list.
I like the idea of building a smaller archetype package, though: that could be a fun one.
Making a full new hero or expansion takes a lot of time. Mini archetype package is great idea.
Edit: Thoughts about this inspired me and I'm already making a Toad Shaman archetype lul.
Lots of super cool cards this week. Good luck everybody!
I notice I am confused. Something I believe isn't true. How do I know what I think I know?
Harry James Potter-Evans-Verres, hpmor.com
Good luck to our finalists! Can't believe I'm among them lol.
Can't believe I am not among them. Now I remember why I don't participate often, it's because I feel upset not being able to advance further.
I was victim of that one Hearthpwn contest where my and other cards on the same page were tied for 13th, which led to some discussion about changing their contest's rules.
"Truth is in the shadows, waiting to be revealed by the light. But light only disperses the shadow." - Me
"If other people shared traits of those considered naive, the world would've become a better place." - Also me
I think the main problem with your card is that it doesn't really do what the prompt said it should do. You didn't focus on the theme of a single Spell School, but went with both Fel and Shadow. Fel doesn't have anything to do with Soul Fragments first of all, it's always demon related. Then secondly, Fel and Shadow are almost the only spell schools Warlock and Demon Hunter have. Barely a restriction in the deck building process, like asking priest to have Shadow and Holy spells.
Beyond that... what's the reward supposed to be? Healing? Because any other Soul Shard synergy is actually anti synergy, as stuff like Void Drinker and Soulshard Lapidary will DESTROY the spells you made into Soul Fragments. Why would you want that? If you wanted to just have the soul fragments drawn to heal, then why use soul fragments at all if their thing is getting burnt for benefits?
I'll boop you
I'm super suprised that R's Combat Dominie didn't make it. Maybe I won't be as straight forward with my feedback in the future, looks like it might paint a target on people's back if their cards are labeled as a potential winner (and I wasn't the only one who said so). Sorry R! :(
I notice I am confused. Something I believe isn't true. How do I know what I think I know?
Harry James Potter-Evans-Verres, hpmor.com
I gave it a low score because it was OP. 1 mana draw a card and it's a 2/1 Divine Shield. Argent Squire, Novice Engineer
And Paladin with just Holy spells is very easy to do, not much of a restriction.
I'll boop you
I checked, and there are really only like 2-4 paladin spells across all of hearthstone that aren't holy that you might actually want to play, aside from Oh My Yogg! there is virtually no deck building restrictions. And on top of that, the reward isn't terribly interesting. You get a strong 1-drop, but that is it. In theory, if I am going to build my deck around a single theme, I would like the payoff to be more than just a good turn 1 play.
Carrion, my wayward grub.
I think one of the main reasons your card might have done bad is because you tried to do something too unique. Aside from the card from the adventure that you had mentioned, there was no precedents for an ability that stored one card inside of another card. It just felt weird. If you had restricted it to a single school instead of doubling up (which kind of defeated the purpose of the competition in the first place) and also just had it shuffle in 10 soul fragments instead of attaching them to cards (which would have mathematically worked out virtually the same way, except it wouldn't have anti-synergy with other soul fragment cards) then you likely would have done better.
Carrion, my wayward grub.
Thanks BasilAnguis and KANSAS for pointing out your reasoning. We don't have to agree on everything, but it certainly helps to understand the ratings. Makes me wonder if it wouldn't be better to split the vote on each card into categories, something I remember DestroyerR doing in their feedback posts. From the top of my head, something like building an average between 5 star ratings of each card's powerlevel balance, flavor and execution would be nice. That would also lower the probability of ties because one persons final score would be the average of an average. The big downside of this suggestion obviously is the added amount of work you have to put into giving your vote which might lead to a further decrease in participation. Hm.
I notice I am confused. Something I believe isn't true. How do I know what I think I know?
Harry James Potter-Evans-Verres, hpmor.com
So... it's not about being totally unique, but just solid enough to garner attention. A little sadge for me, as I do like to be somewhat flashy with designs.
"Truth is in the shadows, waiting to be revealed by the light. But light only disperses the shadow." - Me
"If other people shared traits of those considered naive, the world would've become a better place." - Also me
@Neoguli I dunno, your card was actualy my favourite (except mine of course), and I realy thought you gonna make it.
Ok
Congratulations to grumpymonk!
congrats, grumpymonk!
I notice I am confused. Something I believe isn't true. How do I know what I think I know?
Harry James Potter-Evans-Verres, hpmor.com
Thanks linkblade and anchorm4n!
Well done on the Shadowpriest prediction Wailor, Darkbishop Benedictus is almost exactly Shadow Priestess Shai!
Congrats Wailor, you predicted an actual card! Crazy!
I notice I am confused. Something I believe isn't true. How do I know what I think I know?
Harry James Potter-Evans-Verres, hpmor.com
blizz hire me pls