All Comments

Looks strong because of it's impact on 4, will make for a smoother transition to late game. And requires to be removed. Bound to be played.

Most likely good enough.

Don't know the effects, but will comment this early. Will surely see play somewhere, but a lot of classes have important 4 drops, which make this one not worth running in most cases. It's pure value card, that need a greedy deck with enough survival to have luxury of running it.

Really strange, but strong. There are enough good secrets to enable this one.

Cool card, but looks too slow.

A rare card that might see play just for its raw value.

Honestly, meh card. Doesn't do much for 5 mana and condition.

Leaving out obvious hero-power synergy cards, very good value-wise. Outside of those specific decks, not good enough though.

Good card in Galakrond, Zoo antiaggro tool. Not bad at all.

Can't really evaluate the potential of this card, as it requires a very specific deck for big payoff. But might be just as good early. Looks strong to me.

Interesting engine for spell decks. Probably a meme, but looks fun to try it.

Strong card in any type of deck.

Compared to Self-Sharpening Sword dea, the only slight advantage this weapon has is starting with 2 attack. You can save an attack on this weapon until your next poison, potentially giving this higher durability than SSS, but the bonus damage and its consistency is still less than SSS's base damage of 1+2+3+4=10 attack. If they're trying to push some kind of poison rogue archetype, I think SSS's durability might also get nerfed with Nitroboost Poison.

Too much waiting for this one, but the payoff might be worth it in something like Supreme Archaeology kind of deck.

Libram decks might want this, but in all other cases, this has too little to offer.

I think it's bad, but might easily be wrong about this one. Can be used to stall early game, but Doomsayer is just better being more useful later.

Not great on its own, and also makes your big payoff,  Death Speaker Blackthorn, worse by including deathrattles on weaker end. Can't see this being played in a serious deck. 

Although it's probably not one of the stronger cards from this set, I'm always in for effect uniqueness. I like the fun ones.

Its main strength is in versatility. Can easily see most of those powers useful throughout the game:
> Warlock probably the best one (how good, depends on the deck, might not be the best in more value oriented one), Hunter also being amazing in an aggressive deck.
> Druid/Mage/DH are very useful early for controlling the board, providing you already equipped your dagger.
> Priest/Warrior covering the weakness of the class, although this should be used in desperation only.
> Paladin is most balanced one, probably going to be skipped most of the time, except early when you have to play this card on turn one against aggro.

Strong, but I really dislike the abundance of Freeze effects. Can't force myself to like this one, sorry.

Okay card, along with that 2/3, might make Taunt-midrange Druid playable.

Will probably see play, but I've seen so many similar cards in the past, it's boring. Also, I'm always sceptical about minions in Priest, as they usually don't go along with their win condition. This is not a great ress target either.

When it's most needed, it's at its worst version, 2/2 Rusher. I guess the payoff at (5)/(10) is solid enough to push above the playability threshold.

Those upgrading beasties are really cool though!

Brick by brick, spell Hunter could be a thing. I can't not like card draw for Hunter. Excited to try this one out one day.

Really, really slow, can be played around even the effect is not amazing. The synergy with other tower cards must be better than what was revealed for this card to have a chance.

Good for tempo decks, fairly unique effect. Like it.