All Comments

I can only see this getting played in decks that already currently play Wisp or Desk Imp, and in some murloc decks.

i dont see too much use for this card unlees drow cards whit teh subastator

i hate when people post memes with spelling mistakes in them. Not only the creator is ok with releasing something that hasn't been proof read but then people just repost them. What a world we live in

Also, it´s very useful to write the region you have the quest on.

I'm not saying that the more salacious interpretation is the most common way to read it, but there are lots of ways to say this more clearly. The effort to shorten what Dean said only made it less clear.

Maybe this varies by region or age, but I had no trouble reading this the right way. And even trying to see it the way you’re describing, it’s hard for me to think of “x-style” as code for porn. “XXX-style”, sure, but even that sounds weird to me. (Why would you say “style” there?) A single “X” can mean a million things on its own, but almost never means porn.

That sums it up to Armorsmith, right?

Is a "sucker" for top x-style content online.

I'm also a sucker for TOP X things video/editorial content.

Quick editorial note. The original quote from Dean Ayala makes it very clear that this refers to Ranked Listicles (e.g. Top 10 Year of the Phoenix Hearthstone Cards). Your rewrite seems to unintentionally imply a more pornographic nature to the quote, both by putting sucker in quotes and by adding "-style" to the X. It creates a valid reading whereby sucker is implied to have some double meaning, and Dean's preference is for the best "x-style" content. Taken together, that can easily be read as strongly suggestive.

There's no need for the quotes at all on the word sucker, you'd be better served by either capitalizing "top x" like Dean did, or putting it in quotes (i.e "top x" style content)

Yes

Alright considering how powerful that one card was, maybe the word 'evolve' isn't the right word to use in this context :)

Doom in the Tomb went on too long. If they do another one like it, it has to be shorter.

I thought that was exactly what they’re doing with the card unnerfs coming before the rotation. Overpowered decks of the past return for a short time, but hopefully not for long enough to get boring or for the meta to settle on the most OP one. 

Correct me if I’m wrong but from what I understand the nerf reverts to cards that rotate to wild will be active in this state from the patch that introduces the Barrens cads, which will probably happen after the reveal stream on the 22nd, probably the 23rd or 25th of this month, so there will be a period of about a week or so where these cards will be in standard, unnerfed, before the rotation and the new expansion hit, right?

If that’s right, I think I’m even happier with these changes.

Heh "evolve" 

I just realized now that I posted this on "Site Support & Bug Reports", sorry guys, I think I should have posted this on "Hearthstone General", I don't do many threads.

"The numbers Mason, what do they mean?" CoD.

Jokes aside, in my 3 years experience as IT (not server directly, but maintenance over clients), all server should have at least disaster prevention tools. In this case, fire extinguisher. Lots of em. (Can't really use water to put out fire in electronic as my supervisor used to say).

Quote From FrostyFeet

"I did lobby against a card we ended up reverting, spoiler alert it has charge."

None of the revert-revealed cards so far had Charge (except the namesake spell), so he must mean a Neutr...oh no...oh nonono...Patches is it you?

Arcane golem is a posisblity and OFC leeroy aswell (to 4 which coudl eb considered nerf  as mainly odd decks play him nowadays)

Quad-class can actually be done quite well. If we represent the classes from 0 to 9:

0123

4567

8901

2345

6789

Each class is in two individual groups, which is similar to dual-class. The real tricky aspect of this is to group four classes thematically. It could be really cool, though.

Damn, you got me there. Kinda forgot that Arcane Golem used to be everywhere too.

"Much of the time spent on the development of the class was nailing the basic design that not much was spent on archetype balance."

Yes, we kind of noticed that :)

Regarding the Daily Deals I both like and dislike the idea. In MTGA this is done quite nicely with mostly card styles on discount and the occasional pack. Not sure how Blizzard will implement this. With regards to the main menu design: Yes please. The whole UI has not aged that well and needs an overhaul imo.

Edit: Imagine a pirate flag on the wind (lost the link)

I checked the time and though exactly the same! 

"I'm in chargee now!"

Missing his voice line but not him