All Comments

Looks really bad, and does nothing against any passives as well.

Very interesting card for Gadgetzan decks to gain more draw. Looks promising for priest or mage with cheap spells.

*Looks at Pre-Nerf Razakus-Priest and Paladin-DK* Finally is someone putting a stop to these Quest-Druids heropowering on turn 3! 

Interesting and fun card. Even though it seems designed for meme decks, it could counter the effect of Hakkar.

Just not good enough to see serious play. It has a solid body with a small upside, but +1 on manacost just doesn't cut it. Spellward Jeweler had the same stats, a better effect, and saw zero play. Even in wild against odd and even decks this is just not impactful. Since you can't stall the very early game, you can't even block Even Shaman or Odd Paladin (which isn't played anymore anyway) effective.

Only increasing the cost of the hero power 1 mana it's not good enough. I don't think any deck will run this card.  It's OK for Arena

Very weak card indeed. The effect is not that good, just increasing opponents hero power by 1 and the stats are just average.

Pretty bad.

Seems like a strictly worse Saboteur unless I'm missing something.

Outside of Arena, I don't see myself ever playing this card. Battle cry is low impact on a minion with vanilla stats.

Warrior lackey decks haven't ever been competitive, and while this card is not bad I don't think it will see much play.

A solid 3 drop with lifesteal and a discover effect. This card is quite strong. I wouldn't say it is OP but definitely a staple i many paladin decks.

This can be teched against the new hunter legendary, this Ballista thingy. 

But that aside, it seems not worth playing. 

Very good weapon for dragon hunters decks. The fact it is a hammer makes it's flavour to be less attractive (to me), but still is a strong card.

Quote From Skorpionex

Meh, Saboteur anyone?

Saboteur was a higher mana cost penalty, but only next turn. This one (as written) is the next one in the game on any turn, which offsets the lower penalty.

Of course, it's still not great I don't think 

Really bad, especially as an epic

Very good card that could work out well with the quest druid and the new druid legendary that buffs your treants. I really hope we will see a treant wild deck coming out of this combination.

Diluting the Cobalt Spellkin pool. Wishing for Jade Idol, and getting this...

Very good card. IT makes Surrender to Madness look even worse. I wonder if this card will be nerfed eventually, we will have to wait for the meta to settle I guess.

Good addition for my Golden Quest Mage deck. This being Rare I might even craft it...

2/5 for the vanilla body, but actually unplayable in Constructed.

The effect lingers up to the next HP, even after several turns, but since it applies on a generally weak action, the impact is pretty low nonetheless.

Imagine playing saboteur and then this..."well played!"

Seems like a solid card in treant decks. Even though it is a bit slow, the effect is great. Also synergises well with The Forest's Aid. I guess it will see more play in wild than in standard.

Not an awful card but definitely quite niche.

Seems like its impact will be best had when played on curve, but even then it likely won't be too effective. Spider tanks are also not that great, there are a whole bunch of them now with more powerful effects than this.

Seems ok in arena, but I doubt it will ever get played in constructed.

Purely Arena card.

Well unless your opponent is rush warrior they will eventually hero power, the opportunity cost of this card is not too high, so it would probably ruin their curve.. The other exception is quest druid.. 

Also great vs quest shaman. 

5/4 for 4 is not terrible and the effect is great value even with a couple of dragons in the deck.

Definitely going into my even dragon druid.