Playing my Thief Rogue and discovering Plague of Death against a Druid who filled his board with Lucentbark. It was absolutely beautiful, been playing Thief Rogue for the entire expansion just because of that.
My favorite moment was that highlander decks got a new update to them and we have a replacement for a hunter spell stone a hyene. Can't wait for new dragons.
I agree that Saboteur is a good tech card but Rat has still more vertisality and is more relevant. Pulling out minions like Shudderwock or Elysianna is the thing which Saboteour can't do
Glad to see a well-written response but sadly there are some flaws regarding your thought-process. First of all, let it be known that I'm not a native English speaker. If there were any flaws of mine, or any bad-mouth towards you, apologies within the depths of my heart. Without further ado, let's start.
...You mention three times that you'll take all criticism for the sake of improving your piece, which isn't necessary.
For me, it is needed; for you, it's not, which is fine by me. Maybe one time would be sufficient but still, it must be done. Why? It's a sign from me asking for collaboration of improving these series, that's why.
The commenter wasn't rude, I don't believe, but you mention twice that you won't tolerate any rude comments. As opposed to you asking for no rudeness, your tone during certain parts - "Just be gentle to community's card choices and decks while commenting.", "For starters, why don't you offer a characteristic cards but not a dull one such as Puddlestomper?" - borders on rudeness to the original commenter: the first implies that he was rude, when he wasn't, and the second implies that he would be so dumb as to suggest a card like Puddlestomper. Finally, your response was unnecessarily lengthy and the italics used feel overly dramatic.
With all due respect, I wasn't rude to anybody or humiliating anyone. 1st sentence of mine was a nod to people not act like this one (I'm sure you didn't check the linked content, otherwise you wouldn't have made that comment) and I even mentioned this: "I know you didn't (act rude) by any means but just wanted to give my warning". You can see it within brackets of my post above, just read the whole paragraph clearly. As for 2nd sentence of mine, I can't believe you are stirring up a trouble for such an innocent word: "dull". Here, I meant as "bad, uncharacteristic", can't people really think abstract or have no idea what "figurative meaning" means? I used "dull" to a card as figure of speech, not mentioning "dumb" to a person like you stated, in all honesty.
About your final statement, italics were used for emphasizing my wording, nothing more. As for my response being unnecessarily lengthy, if I had to clarify something for good, I need to explain in full detail and I don't think it's too long by any means.
Overall, the impression this comment gives is one of a defensive person who has rushed to defend his article, has perceived more rudeness in the comment above than what is actually there, and as a result ends up being verbose, dramatic, and slightly rude.
If defending an article means talking honestly/friendly/freely but not manipulating my thoughts into a different matter, I guess you are right. My writings might be verbose due to the fact that I'm not a native English speaker but the reason is: I want to clarify myself as best as possible, no offense. However, I believe they are not dramatic and rude, if you check the paragraph above.
I don't say this to be hurtful - this is a very understandable thing to do, and I don't respect your enjoyable writing or yourself less because of it - but to bring attention to something that I don't believe most people would take the time to point out to you.
So, if I understood correct from your statements bolded, you think I love bringing attention, stating "Hey, whatever I said is a rule" or "Look, I'm so fabulous" and such? You may not like me, which I don't care, but clarifying myself doesn't mean I'm bringing attention -or a dictator- in any matter.
If you're going to be putting yourself and your work in front of large numbers of people, correcting this is important. In the future, I would recommend taking a moment to simplify your thoughts before you reply to something - Is responding to this worth it? What are the important points to respond to here? What impression do I want to give?
I believe I already corrected myself by a huge margin thanks to your misunderstanding of wording of "dull" and not looking at linked comment. Also, I would like you to show empathy towards someone before commenting such as "What if (s)he mentioned this way?", "While writing, did I offend a person in any matter?", "What would I respond regarding that comment if I were here?". Your questions are on the mark while I think about writing comments every time but please think mine as well.
TL;DR: I am a kind person. If I meant anything bad, I'm truly sorry. If you wish, we can continue discussing on Discord via PM. I really would like to discuss with someone such a level-headed person
My favourite moment was when I said: "Gotta open golden Zephrys as pre-order legendary." Logged in, flipped the card and let a scream of pure joy come out of my mouth. Such beauty, incredible.
Okay now that we've seen how broken this card is after the nerfs, I'd like to point out how lazy the design of this quest is. You literally don't have to do anything to complete it, you don't need to build your deck in a special way and the reward is the only quest reward for which you don't have to spend any mana, your cards just become OP. Sure, you can run out of steam and the deck can be defeated, but that was not my point. It's just very unfun to play against. Just imagine if the shaman quest reward hero power was a passive. Also, Shudderwock would still be a worse play than Cenarius.
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
I must say, like others, that Zephrys was a great surprise and now is one of my favorite card from SOU.
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
The shaman quest is fun for me
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
Playing my Thief Rogue and discovering Plague of Death against a Druid who filled his board with Lucentbark. It was absolutely beautiful, been playing Thief Rogue for the entire expansion just because of that.
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
The Octosari special effect when drawing 8
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
My favorite moment was that highlander decks got a new update to them and we have a replacement for a hunter spell stone a hyene. Can't wait for new dragons.
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
That I once again pulled both Mage Legendaries from packs. And yes, Mage is currently my main class, so this IS my favourite moment! :D
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
My favorite Uldum moment is when I play Zephrys
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
Coining prismatic lens and hitting Wisp and Tip the Scales.
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
Zephrys - such a unique design
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
The winds of Zephyrs the great are the greatest!
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
When the community solved the Uldum gameboard's musical secret
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
Opening the Shaman quest!
So.. What's the purpose of Cho?
Mummy Quest Paladin
oh man I was looking why I couldn't import it and missed that one.
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
The Anubisath Warbringer + Charge Minions Plottwist Warlock dec. Its a heckuvalot of fun!
Legendary Reno DK Mage
I agree that Saboteur is a good tech card but Rat has still more vertisality and is more relevant. Pulling out minions like Shudderwock or Elysianna is the thing which Saboteour can't do
Mummy Quest Paladin
OMG ok I thought I was going insane! Yikes.
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
My favorite is when the nerfs hit, as always.
The Forgotten Wilds of Hearthstone - Gold, Shadows, and Ethereals
Glad to see a well-written response but sadly there are some flaws regarding your thought-process. First of all, let it be known that I'm not a native English speaker. If there were any flaws of mine, or any bad-mouth towards you, apologies within the depths of my heart. Without further ado, let's start.
For me, it is needed; for you, it's not, which is fine by me. Maybe one time would be sufficient but still, it must be done. Why? It's a sign from me asking for collaboration of improving these series, that's why.
With all due respect, I wasn't rude to anybody or humiliating anyone. 1st sentence of mine was a nod to people not act like this one (I'm sure you didn't check the linked content, otherwise you wouldn't have made that comment) and I even mentioned this: "I know you didn't (act rude) by any means but just wanted to give my warning". You can see it within brackets of my post above, just read the whole paragraph clearly. As for 2nd sentence of mine, I can't believe you are stirring up a trouble for such an innocent word: "dull". Here, I meant as "bad, uncharacteristic", can't people really think abstract or have no idea what "figurative meaning" means? I used "dull" to a card as figure of speech, not mentioning "dumb" to a person like you stated, in all honesty.
About your final statement, italics were used for emphasizing my wording, nothing more. As for my response being unnecessarily lengthy, if I had to clarify something for good, I need to explain in full detail and I don't think it's too long by any means.
If defending an article means talking honestly/friendly/freely but not manipulating my thoughts into a different matter, I guess you are right. My writings might be verbose due to the fact that I'm not a native English speaker but the reason is: I want to clarify myself as best as possible, no offense. However, I believe they are not dramatic and rude, if you check the paragraph above.
So, if I understood correct from your statements bolded, you think I love bringing attention, stating "Hey, whatever I said is a rule" or "Look, I'm so fabulous" and such? You may not like me, which I don't care, but clarifying myself doesn't mean I'm bringing attention -or a dictator- in any matter.
I believe I already corrected myself by a huge margin thanks to your misunderstanding of wording of "dull" and not looking at linked comment. Also, I would like you to show empathy towards someone before commenting such as "What if (s)he mentioned this way?", "While writing, did I offend a person in any matter?", "What would I respond regarding that comment if I were here?". Your questions are on the mark while I think about writing comments every time but please think mine as well.
TL;DR: I am a kind person. If I meant anything bad, I'm truly sorry. If you wish, we can continue discussing on Discord via PM. I really would like to discuss with someone such a level-headed person
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
My favorite Uldum moment was that i beat the Lich King with the remaining eight classes and consequential unlocked Arthas.
Rock, Paper, Scissors - Genies, Machines, and Tigers, Oh My!
I play Da Undatakah in Quest Paladin, imo is more efficient than Tirion
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
My favourite moment was when I said: "Gotta open golden Zephrys as pre-order legendary."
Logged in, flipped the card and let a scream of pure joy come out of my mouth.
Such beauty, incredible.
Tombs of Terror Solo Content Giveaway
playing quest rogue
Untapped Potential
Okay now that we've seen how broken this card is after the nerfs, I'd like to point out how lazy the design of this quest is. You literally don't have to do anything to complete it, you don't need to build your deck in a special way and the reward is the only quest reward for which you don't have to spend any mana, your cards just become OP. Sure, you can run out of steam and the deck can be defeated, but that was not my point. It's just very unfun to play against. Just imagine if the shaman quest reward hero power was a passive. Also, Shudderwock would still be a worse play than Cenarius.
Mummy Quest Paladin
4 times annoy? LOL