Bluetracker
Tracks Blizzard employees across various accounts.
Current Arena meta
Hello everyone. I was wondering what the class tier list is like after the most recent patch/nerf/update.
Best regards.
Tracks Blizzard employees across various accounts.
Hello everyone. I was wondering what the class tier list is like after the most recent patch/nerf/update.
Best regards.
Iksar
These are the class win rates as of yesterday afternoon compared to what they were prior to the 13.05 patch. All classes are very close together, which is almost always what happens after a micro-adjustment update (good job data science team!). One of the reasons we do this is so you can pick the class you find most fun or the class you are most comfortable with rather than having to worry about what is good or bad in the current meta.
Current:
Druid - 48.6%
Hunter - 50.1%
Mage - 50.1%
Paladin - 49.5%
Priest - 49.8%
Rogue - 50.4%
Shaman - 48.7%
Warlock - 50.2%
Warrior - 50.9%
Before Microadjustments:
Druid - 46.9%
Hunter - 54.7%
Mage - 48.2%
Paladin - 47.6%
Priest - 47.6%
Rogue - 51.6%
Shaman - 46.1%
Warlock - 47.6%
Warrior - 52.7%
Iksar
Selection bias, date range, sample size. There are a bunch of reasons the data could be different, most likely a combination of factors.
I'm not sure if HSReplay uses the data from the player who has the app, both the app user and the opponent, or just the opponent of the app user. There is some benefit to only using the opponent of the app user because it's a less bias sample. It doesn't eliminate all bias, though. Technically, if users of the app are better than average players, they get to matches where they are 7-1, 8-2, 10-1, etc. This would mean their opponents are also better on average.
We don't really agonize over a 3-5% difference in win rates for players of different skill levels with different decks. It's generally healthy for differences like that to exist and for some classes to be harder or easier to play than others. Constructed decks like Miracle Rogue, Patron Warrior, or APM Priest have huge differences in win rate depending on the level of player playing the deck, but it's not a bad thing. Hunter has historically had a higher win rate at lower levels of play, I imagine it's because the gameplan of Hunter tends to be more straightforward than a class like Rogue of Priest.