Bluetracker

Tracks Blizzard employees across various accounts.

Blizzard: offers more products that people want to buy. People: https://t.co/SemA8llCEV

Blizzard: offers more products that people want to buy. People: https://t.co/SemA8llCEV

hsdecktech

Posted 4 years, 5 months ago (Source)

Blizzard: offers more products that people want to buy. People: https://t.co/SemA8llCEV

imik_plays

Posted 4 years, 5 months ago (Source)

@hsdecktech I think that's fine, the only problem is that "IF" you want to buy those Bundles, you only have limited time to do so (1-2 weeks) instead of them being in the shop until the end of the expansion cycle at least. It might be only me, though, idk. 😂 Also skins with no packs... 😥

HSTopDecks

Posted 4 years, 5 months ago (Source)

@imik_plays @hsdecktech As for the packs: If I can pick between 1 skin + 25 packs for $25 and 4 skins for $25, I would definitely pick the latter. If I want packs then I can get pack bundles. I think that separating pack & skin sales is good (people who have enough cards/Dust can ignore pack bundles).

imik_plays

Posted 4 years, 5 months ago (Source)

@HSTopDecks @hsdecktech Maybe, but for me, it just feels weird that we already have like 3029301290 skins in the game and at least packs along with skins give you something "valuable". Idk, It might be just me.

hsdecktech

Posted 4 years, 5 months ago (Source)

@imik_plays @HSTopDecks I’m not the person who decides these things, but my personal stance on it is that the whole point of selling cosmetics is to keep adding features to the game without raising the cost of the game—so making most cosmetics NOT tie to gameplay is correct.

hsdecktech

Posted 4 years, 5 months ago (Source)

@imik_plays @HSTopDecks If the value isn’t there for you, then you just don’t buy them and you’re in the same place as you were before.

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
Blizzard: offers more products that people want to buy.

People: https://t.co/SemA8llCEV (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1440372553587953664">hsdecktech</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@hsdecktech I think that's fine, the only problem is that "IF" you want to buy those Bundles, you only have limited time to do so (1-2 weeks) instead of them being in the shop until the end of the expansion cycle at least. It might be only me, though, idk. 😂 Also skins with no packs... 😥 (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1440375040696991745">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@imik_plays @hsdecktech As for the packs: If I can pick between 1 skin + 25 packs for $25 and 4 skins for $25, I would definitely pick the latter. If I want packs then I can get pack bundles. I think that separating pack & skin sales is good (people who have enough cards/Dust can ignore pack bundles). (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1440377283676569608">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@HSTopDecks @hsdecktech Maybe, but for me, it just feels weird that we already have like 3029301290 skins in the game and at least packs along with skins give you something "valuable". Idk, It might be just me. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1440378157865918470">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@imik_plays @HSTopDecks I’m not the person who decides these things, but my personal stance on it is that the whole point of selling cosmetics is to keep adding features to the game without raising the cost of the game—so making most cosmetics NOT tie to gameplay is correct. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1440378491749343246">hsdecktech</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@imik_plays @HSTopDecks If the value isn’t there for you, then you just don’t buy them and you’re in the same place as you were before. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1440378597168975872">hsdecktech</a>)
<hr/>

Tweet

Blizzard: offers more products that people want to buy.

People: https://t.co/SemA8llCEV (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1440372553587953664">Source</a>)

@hsdecktech I think that's fine, the only problem is that "IF" you want to buy those Bundles, you only have limited time to do so (1-2 weeks) instead of them being in the shop until the end of the expansion cycle at least. It might be only me, though, idk. 😂 Also skins with no packs... 😥

@imik_plays @hsdecktech As for the packs: If I can pick between 1 skin + 25 packs for $25 and 4 skins for $25, I would definitely pick the latter. If I want packs then I can get pack bundles. I think that separating pack &amp; skin sales is good (people who have enough cards/Dust can ignore pack bundles).

@HSTopDecks @hsdecktech Maybe, but for me, it just feels weird that we already have like 3029301290 skins in the game and at least packs along with skins give you something "valuable". Idk, It might be just me.

@imik_plays @HSTopDecks I’m not the person who decides these things, but my personal stance on it is that the whole point of selling cosmetics is to keep adding features to the game without raising the cost of the game—so making most cosmetics NOT tie to gameplay is correct. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1440378491749343246">Source</a>)

@imik_plays @HSTopDecks If the value isn’t there for you, then you just don’t buy them and you’re in the same place as you were before. (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1440378597168975872">Source</a>)
 
 <hr/>