Bluetracker

Tracks Blizzard employees across various accounts.

Share three good @MarvelSnap decks in terms of both cube gain rate and win-rate in the current meta (top 15% MMR) in Beta. These are not centroids so you could swap a few cards and they could still be pretty good. ⭐️ https://t.co/M3zqpT5t73

Share three good @MarvelSnap decks in terms of both cube gain rate and win-rate in the current meta (top 15% MMR) in Beta. These are not centroids so you could swap a few cards and they could still be pretty good. ⭐️ https://t.co/M3zqpT5t73

Tian Ding

Posted 3 years, 9 months ago (Source)

Share three good @MarvelSnap decks in terms of both cube gain rate and win-rate in the current meta (top 15% MMR) in Beta. These are not centroids so you could swap a few cards and they could still be pretty good. ⭐️ https://t.co/M3zqpT5t73

TiagoTaparelli

Posted 3 years, 9 months ago (Source)

@sky_tding @MarvelSnap Very interesting lists! Would you say that deck winrate is a better metric to asses the ‘intrinsic strength’ of a deck, while the cube rate is skewed by the ‘player’s skill’ in using the snap mechanic?

Tian Ding

Posted 3 years, 9 months ago (Source)

@TiagoTaparelli @MarvelSnap I think both metrics represent "strength" when the "variety factor" in the player cohort is big enough. When cohorts are small and decks are not played by a variety of players they lean more towards "skill". It's a case by case thing depends on the data we are looking at. :)

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
Share three good @MarvelSnap decks in terms of both cube gain rate and win-rate in the current meta (top 15% MMR) in Beta. These are not centroids so you could swap a few cards and they could still be pretty good. ⭐️ https://t.co/M3zqpT5t73 (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1530070690468024322">Tian Ding</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@sky_tding @MarvelSnap Very interesting lists! Would you say that deck winrate is a better metric to asses the ‘intrinsic strength’ of a deck, while the cube rate is skewed by the ‘player’s skill’ in using the snap mechanic? (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1530151776594415616">None</a>)
<hr/>

<blockquote class="quoted">
 
</blockquote>
@TiagoTaparelli @MarvelSnap I think both metrics represent "strength" when the "variety factor" in the player cohort is big enough. When cohorts are small and decks are not played by a variety of players they lean more towards "skill". It's a case by case thing depends on the data we are looking at. :) (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1530313883746848769">Tian Ding</a>)
<hr/>

Tweet

Share three good @MarvelSnap decks in terms of both cube gain rate and win-rate in the current meta (top 15% MMR) in Beta. These are not centroids so you could swap a few cards and they could still be pretty good. ⭐️ https://t.co/M3zqpT5t73 (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1530070690468024322">Source</a>)

@sky_tding @MarvelSnap Very interesting lists! Would you say that deck winrate is a better metric to asses the ‘intrinsic strength’ of a deck, while the cube rate is skewed by the ‘player’s skill’ in using the snap mechanic?

@TiagoTaparelli @MarvelSnap I think both metrics represent "strength" when the "variety factor" in the player cohort is big enough. When cohorts are small and decks are not played by a variety of players they lean more towards "skill". It's a case by case thing depends on the data we are looking at. :) (<a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1530313883746848769">Source</a>)
 
 <hr/>