When you think of a real card game, if you shuffle a card into your deck, you normally don't shuffle your entire deck. You take the shuffled card and put it in a random spot in your deck.
The only way for that spot to be random is to shuffle the entire deck.
It's not a keyword because there are no cards with more text or there are no cards with more text because it's not a keyword?
Poisonous became a keyword with Mean Streets of Gadgetzan. Let's take a look:
Cards with the keyword Poisonous released before Gadgetzan (9 sets*): 4 (0.44 average per set) Cards with the keyword Poisonous released after Gadgetzan (13 sets): 30 (2.3 average per set)
I would replace Murloc Tidehunter for any non-token murloc. Tidehunter + Brann (and sometimes Khadgar) makes transitioning into murlocs late game relatively easy, making their bad early/mid game mostly irrelevant.
If we ignore the requirement, it's a pretty good card. Rogue didn't have any good 4 drops back then, so it could be played with minimal changes to the deck.
I don't think there's any problem with Greenglade Duo for example. If your deck can't kill a x/2 or a x/3 after 1 or 2 buffs, then your deck deserves to lose.
So, you are saying that every single deck that isn't based on elusive or challenger minions deserves to lose? Well, that's terrible balance
Do you play River Crocolisk in all of your decks because it's a very strong card? No? Then it's not power creep.
Ok, 50 bucks then.
It's an entirely cosmetic item, what's the problem?
The only way for that spot to be random is to shuffle the entire deck.
You are so close
It's not a keyword because there are no cards with more text or there are no cards with more text because it's not a keyword?
Poisonous became a keyword with Mean Streets of Gadgetzan. Let's take a look:
Cards with the keyword Poisonous released before Gadgetzan (9 sets*): 4 (0.44 average per set)
Cards with the keyword Poisonous released after Gadgetzan (13 sets): 30 (2.3 average per set)
*8 if we count Classic and Basic as only one
Source: https://hearthstone.gamepedia.com/Poisonous
I may have made some mistake when counting or classifying, but it's obvious that it became more common after it became a keyword.
Without Megasaur, they are dragons but worse.
I would replace Murloc Tidehunter for any non-token murloc. Tidehunter + Brann (and sometimes Khadgar) makes transitioning into murlocs late game relatively easy, making their bad early/mid game mostly irrelevant.
If we ignore the requirement, it's a pretty good card. Rogue didn't have any good 4 drops back then, so it could be played with minimal changes to the deck.
A card stronger than a card that sees no play is not powercreep
Do you mean a good stated card that will give me better draws? Yes
It could maybe work in an aggro deck whose highest cost cards are 5s.
Battletag: Chanchi#21891
Region: EU
Trade Only?: No
Battletag: Chanchi#21891
Region: EU
Trade Only?: No
Oh, right, paladin and warrior are also not in the game
Warrior has receiving damage sinergies
What's this Charge keyword? Is it new for this expansion?
That's how it always worked
Mogu Cultist
A card that requires more than 2 copies of the same minion to work
Check if you logged in in the correct region, it happened to a friend that his launcher changed to NA for no reason
Even better, it could autodetect when you have a deck string and automatically paste it
So, you are saying that every single deck that isn't based on elusive or challenger minions deserves to lose? Well, that's terrible balance