Sinascendant

I think that we haven't seen any yet so we can't make that determination.

As it stands, it is not a very good card. They'd have to add something godly to make it playable in the current …

It doesn't matter? You're burning 2 of your opponent's mana every time you play it, AND they are still guaranteed to take the damage once. If you play four curse cards that's the equivalent of a Fireball to face, assuming …

Ah yes, questlock, a deck that sees literally no play in Legend because it's so bad right now.

No lock variant is performing better than mediocre right now and the best is handlock in regular legend, Owl …

I'm gonna be honest, it feels like you have never played this game before from your analysis.

If topdecking a naga is bad, so is topdecking a 1 drop. So by your logic all 1 drops are bad.

Saying "naga …

Except they're removing the weapons that are good with it, Bulwark and Scythe. Hell even Baton would have been pretty good with it.

But with those, Sword Eater, and Krastinov rotating out, Weapon doesnt have a lot of support …

Being a 5 mana 5/5 hurts it a lot. Chances are by turn 5 you are already going to have used at least one weapon. Giving +1/+1 to maybe three weapons is not very good at all. The only weaps …

Uh. What? Call of the Grave on him literally does nothing

You still didn't read it right. Your first TWO hero powers activate immediately and you get to choose them. So it's a summon two 2/3 taunt and aoe, or burn face for 6 summon two 2/3, etc. 

I mean it was already good, no reason not to. 

You're missing a couple of things on Smite. First, you can roll him from the Juggernaut. That's already huge, getting a 6/4 body for free that gives everything you drop from your hand charge. 

Secondly, he affects …