New Neutral Minion - Devoted Maniac

Submitted 4 years, 11 months ago by

A new Common Neutral Minion, Devoted Maniac, has been revealed!

Devoted Maniac Card Image

Discuss this card below or head on over to the card page to give it a rating!


Learn more about Descent of Dragons

Head on over to our dedicated guide for Descent of Dragons!


Get Cheaper Card Packs

This section contains affiliate links.

If you want to save money when buying Hearthstone packs, you should check out Amazon Coins! It's an easy way to save up to 25% off Hearthstone packs so you can get into the new expansion without worrying about your wallet too much. We've got a detailed guide on how to Get Started with Amazon Coins, but if you've already dealt with them in the past, you can buy some more by clicking right here.

  • Arthas's Avatar
    Robot Black Lotus 1265 5754 Posts Joined 03/10/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    A new Common Neutral Minion, Devoted Maniac, has been revealed!

    Devoted Maniac Card Image

    Discuss this card below or head on over to the card page to give it a rating!


    Learn more about Descent of Dragons

    Head on over to our dedicated guide for Descent of Dragons!


    Get Cheaper Card Packs

    This section contains affiliate links.

    If you want to save money when buying Hearthstone packs, you should check out Amazon Coins! It's an easy way to save up to 25% off Hearthstone packs so you can get into the new expansion without worrying about your wallet too much. We've got a detailed guide on how to Get Started with Amazon Coins, but if you've already dealt with them in the past, you can buy some more by clicking right here.

    Your friendly neighbourhood bot!
    Like what I'm doing? Disable ads and unlock cosmetics with Out of Cards Premium!

    0
  • Ballsdeeper's Avatar
    205 95 Posts Joined 06/07/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    No good.

    1
  • DoubleSummon's Avatar
    Ancestral Recall 1585 2271 Posts Joined 03/25/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago
    Quote From Ballsdeeper

    No good.

    yep like [Hearthstone Card (cable rat) Not Found] maybe a class will need additional invokers... it's probably the worst one but the invoke effect + the need for more of them is enough of a reason to run this card.

    3
  • AliRadicali's Avatar
    465 713 Posts Joined 06/06/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    It's not really possible to know whether this will see play until we see the full set of invoke cards as well as all the different Galakrond hero power/invoke effects. Bear in mind that the invoke effect only has to generate 2 mana worth of stuff to make this card cost effective, which is incidentally how much hero powers cost, and upgraded hero powers actually tend to be worth about 2 mana.

    Four mana for a 2/2 rush, 2 1/1 Imps and a tick on my Galakrond counter doesn't sound like a horrible deal, for example.

    2
  • CableKnight's Avatar
    Rexxar 405 187 Posts Joined 03/14/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Interesting in zoo warlock. 

    Gosh dang it, cards bad.

    3
  • sto650's Avatar
    Santa Braum 635 738 Posts Joined 03/30/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Umm, even with the invoke, this is an absolutely terrible card. 4 cost, 2/2 rush? Even as a 3-cost 2/1 rush, it would still be borderline unplayable. Other 4 cost rush cards include: Militia Commander, Restless Mummy, Swift Messenger, and Steel Rager. Compared to ANY of those cards, this is way, way below unplayable. Probably tops the charts as one of the worst cards I've ever seen Blizzard print. Full stop.

    Edit: You can also compare it to the 5 cost invoke card literally right beside it on the reveal chart - a 4/5 taunt. THAT card is a totally normal stat-line for a 5-cost taunt with another effect (like Rotten Applebaum). But for some reason, this card has at least 2-3 fewer stats than any other normal 4-cost card. Completely unplayable.

    Edit #2: A 2/2 rush is functionally almost identical to a spell that deals 2 damage to a minion, like Lesser Jasper Spellstone, Arcane Blast or Cheap Shot. Hunters have a 2/1 rush minion Hunting Mastiff - it costs 2 AND has echo. The fact that Cheap Shot deals 2 damage to a minion exactly mirrors the hunting mastiff. The health is basically irrelevant since it will almost always be trading into something. 1 health or 2 health makes almost no difference. So, for the Devoted Maniac, you are paying 2.5 mana JUST for the invoke (since a 2/2 rush is functionally identical to a 2/1 rush minion, and a vanilla 2/1 rush minion is valued right about 1.5 mana). 

    I mean seriously, I cannot get over how understatted and overcosted this minion is. It's mind-boggling. This will not make the cut for any deck, regardless of how much the deck wants to Invoke.

    2
  • DoubleSummon's Avatar
    Ancestral Recall 1585 2271 Posts Joined 03/25/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago
    Quote From AliRadicali

    It's not really possible to know whether this will see play until we see the full set of invoke cards as well as all the different Galakrond hero power/invoke effects. Bear in mind that the invoke effect only has to generate 2 mana worth of stuff to make this card cost effective, which is incidentally how much hero powers cost, and upgraded hero powers actually tend to be worth about 2 mana.

    Four mana for a 2/2 rush, 2 1/1 Imps and a tick on my Galakrond counter doesn't sound like a horrible deal, for example.

    I see how you did the math but the galakrond hero powers are not really worth the full 2 mana, it's still an hero power..

    add random priest card to your hand is similar to the 1 mana classic rng cards.

    add a random lackey to your hand is a 1 mana effect (Sinister Deal)

    summon 2 1/1 imps is costed at 1 mana as well (Lost in the Jungle)

    so I can assume this card is just not cost efficient but as I said if you really want more invokers this is probably the last one you add as a 2/2 rush is QUITE garbage.. but maybe the warrior one has synergy with rush cards so it might be worthwhile in warrior

    or maybe shaman gets really expensive ones and you want to use this in quest shaman for the double battlecry (depends on how strong galakrond is you might want quest for mid game and galakrond as finisher, remember the galakrond effect is a battlecry, 9 mana double galakrond might be game winnning if it deals face damage or something).

    Or maybe you want ALL the invokers in the deck for some reason, I mean if the payoff for invoking twice is as good as the 2 cards we saw that do that maybe you really just want all of them no matter how mediocre they are.

    2
  • AliRadicali's Avatar
    465 713 Posts Joined 06/06/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago
    Quote From DoubleSummon
    Quote From AliRadicali

    It's not really possible to know whether this will see play until we see the full set of invoke cards as well as all the different Galakrond hero power/invoke effects. Bear in mind that the invoke effect only has to generate 2 mana worth of stuff to make this card cost effective, which is incidentally how much hero powers cost, and upgraded hero powers actually tend to be worth about 2 mana.

    Four mana for a 2/2 rush, 2 1/1 Imps and a tick on my Galakrond counter doesn't sound like a horrible deal, for example.

    I see how you did the math but the galakrond hero powers are not really worth the full 2 mana, it's still an hero power..

    add random priest card to your hand is similar to the 1 mana classic rng cards.

    add a random lackey to your hand is a 1 mana effect (Sinister Deal)

    summon 2 1/1 imps is costed at 1 mana as well (Lost in the Jungle)

    so I can assume this card is just not cost efficient but as I said if you really want more invokers this is probably the last one you add as a 2/2 rush is QUITE garbage.. but maybe the warrior one has synergy with rush cards so it might be worthwhile in warrior

    or maybe shaman gets really expensive ones and you want to use this in quest shaman for the double battlecry (depends on how strong galakrond is you might want quest for mid game and galakrond as finisher, remember the galakrond effect is a battlecry, 9 mana double galakrond might be game winnning if it deals face damage or something).

    Or maybe you want ALL the invokers in the deck for some reason, I mean if the payoff for invoking twice is as good as the 2 cards we saw that do that maybe you really just want all of them no matter how mediocre they are.

    Cards that combine more than one effect tend to cost an extra 0.5-1 mana relative to what the effects would be worth if they were printed on individual cards. For example, take novice engineer: 'Draw 1' is worth 1 mana, a 1/1 is worth less than one, but combine the two together and 1/1: draw a card for 2 is fair. On top of that power per mana and power per card tend to be negatively correlated: the more value-per-card, the less power-per-mana and vice versa. Holy smite has a 2:1 damage to mana ratio, Fireball is 3:2, Pyroblast is 1:1. This is because card economy matters: you have a limited deck size and limited draws. If you have only cheap, efficient cards in your deck you will run out of value in long games, that's a fundamental balancing principle in games like Hearthstone.

    Lost in The Jungle costs one mana and a card slot in your deck/hand.1/1s generated from invokes are "free".

    0
  • RandomGuy's Avatar
    430 614 Posts Joined 05/29/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    I think it depends on the particular Galakrond.

    I don't want this in Rogue (better removal) or Priest (bad hero power), but I probably want it in Warlock (where it becomes a 4 mana 2/2 rush and 2 1/1's). Maybe in Warrior because Town Crier synergy exists.

    I would guess that this is probably a staple in Galakrond Zoo but never played anywhere else.

    1
  • Joda's Avatar
    HearthStationeer 1020 150 Posts Joined 04/01/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Its just... too balanced, i guess. We havent seen the warrior and the shaman hero powers tho, but this guy is just lame :D I hope we wont have to run it for consistent invoking, that would feel awkward.

    Never netdeck, craft Whizbang instead!

    0
  • xreflex98's Avatar
    Bulbasaur 125 96 Posts Joined 11/21/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Pretty bad, but might see play if  Galakrond sees play.

    0
  • ArcanisDF's Avatar
    660 214 Posts Joined 08/01/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    what? just... WHAT??? 4 mana 2/2 rush? The wors card so far... glad it's not the filler epic lol

    0
  • mayhern's Avatar
    Wizard 355 294 Posts Joined 07/26/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Useless card. Even with the invoke power it is too costly to see play.

    0
  • forcemajeure's Avatar
    410 230 Posts Joined 04/01/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Doesn't do enough for the mana cost, and it won't see (intentional) play

    Start date: 5/16/14     Current gold: 16,410      Current dust: 17,200    Play wins: 10,786   Legendary from crafting: 26

    Cash spent: $125.00  Lifetime gold: 177,110   Dust reserves: 62,985  Arena Wins: 907  Legendary from packs: 127

    0
  • ArngrimUndying's Avatar
    Draconically Dedicated 520 626 Posts Joined 06/11/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Pretty bad card. The cost is too high for the low dmg stat and the Invoke - I can't see how this gets played in any deck sorry.

    0
  • linkblade91's Avatar
    Senior Writer Serra Angel 1710 2898 Posts Joined 02/09/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Unless you're desperate for Invokers, I don't see why you would play such a lousy card.

    0
  • Tedripp3r's Avatar
    50 2 Posts Joined 11/21/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    the worst card until here of this expansion. Useless like eager underling.

    0
  • Orrien's Avatar
    410 72 Posts Joined 03/15/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Bad in every galakrond deck. It probably won't see any play.

    0
  • Alfi's Avatar
    Devoted Academic 1790 1375 Posts Joined 05/29/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    I believe this is much better than it looks.

    -=alfi=-

    0
  • johnyDI's Avatar
    Island 210 172 Posts Joined 03/31/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Reminds me of the C'thun days when you could make an deck with praticly just c'thun cards and draw cards. Then people started to refine the decks, and some of the less efficient c'thun cards got cut. 

    This is going to suffer the same fate. stats are not good, cost too much, removes too little. Either the invocation is really worth it, or this will be the first to be cut from the decks.

    0
  • Nere's Avatar
    120 67 Posts Joined 07/28/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    I think the other neutral invoking card with taunt is better. 2/2 rush for 4 mana is just very weak.

    0
  • Valord's Avatar
    465 281 Posts Joined 05/28/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Its power really scales onto which Galakrond deck its being used for like Warlock one is fine with the imps but others I'm not sure about.

    0
  • Input's Avatar
    470 259 Posts Joined 06/01/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Mummy Paladin ran some sub-optimal reborn minions, but I think we're getting enough invoke cards to not need this.

    0
  • DelkoHS's Avatar
    Child of Galakrond 485 481 Posts Joined 05/28/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    I don't think this card is too bad. Some people have compared it with an always low-rolling Imp-losion, which is an accurate description imo. It Invokes as well, so it's decent I guess. Depending on the other Invoke cards this may or may not be run.

    0
  • Hedwyn's Avatar
    Draconically Dedicated 325 161 Posts Joined 07/05/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    This one looks pretty bad, 2/2 for 4 mana is terrible, Shield of Galakrond for example is miles times better.

    I'm sorry for my bad english :)

    0
  • Almaniarra's Avatar
    HearthStationeer 1000 1504 Posts Joined 03/21/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    as I said for Shield of Galakrond;

    Quote From Almaniarra

    Reasonable neutral Invoke minion. Can be broken or bad according to Galakronds' hero powers. 1 card 5 form. Neutral Invoke cards are so different. Hard to evaluate.

    it is;

    4/5 Taunt; Add a random priest minion to your hand
    4/5 Taunt; Add a random lackey to your hand
    4/5 Taunt; Summon two 1/1 imps

    at the same time and will be more when we learn other hero powers of Galakrond.

    So early to evaluate neutral Invoke cards imo.

    it is;

    2/2 Rush; Add a random priest minion to your hand
    2/2 Rush; Add a random lackey to your hand
    2/2 Rush; Summon two 1/1 imps

    Unpopular Opinion Incarnate

    0
  • frosthearth's Avatar
    655 585 Posts Joined 03/18/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Currently can only even think of playing it in warlock.

     
    0
  • Horus's Avatar
    Detective Pikachu 2575 3348 Posts Joined 05/29/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    I'd say the design of this card is a bit ... rushed ^^

    Struggle with Heroic Galakrond's Awakening? I got your back : 

    0
  • TheOdinson's Avatar
    515 153 Posts Joined 06/04/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Currently the worst of the revealed Invoke cards, but still potentially necessary. Best in Warlock atm, but still pretty miserable.

    To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of the women.

    0
  • YourPrivateNightmare's Avatar
    Skeleton 2010 4741 Posts Joined 03/25/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    If this is what the other Invokers are going to look like then Galakrond decks are doomed.

    I tried having fun once.

    It was awful.

    0
  • troY's Avatar
    Funnel Cakes 250 271 Posts Joined 11/21/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Doesn't seem all the good tbh, but it might still see play if other Invoke cards are also bad.

    0
  • allthehype's Avatar
    Crossroads Historian 630 739 Posts Joined 07/26/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Could be playable at 3 mana, now it’s just terrible.

    0
  • Wagnuz's Avatar
    125 67 Posts Joined 07/26/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    No good enough stats, I guess you'd go for other ways to invoke.

    0
  • og0's Avatar
    Red Riding Hood 1570 1062 Posts Joined 03/31/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Pack filler?  Perhaps I just don't understand what deck this would be good in.

    All generalizations are false.

    0
  • Koetti's Avatar
    1095 863 Posts Joined 11/21/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Definitely the worst Card so far.

    MAYBE in Warrior, because of rush synergies and the fact that the invoke effect might help with the lost tempo

    0
  • KANSAS's Avatar
    Old God Fanatic 1745 2912 Posts Joined 03/25/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    With the new card Galakrond, the Unbreakable I am confident in saying that Devoted Maniac will at least see play in warrior. Dealing a total of 5 damage for 4 mana is slightly worse than Militia Commander, but it does help you upgrade galakrond. This minion may be very small and underwhelming, but I think it will at least be played in an aggro/midrange warrior list using galakrond.

    Carrion, my wayward grub.

    1
  • theo333's Avatar
    Outlandish Rager 975 887 Posts Joined 03/29/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Better make your Galakrond worth it for such a worthless Rush.

    0
  • 8Nikano's Avatar
    155 144 Posts Joined 11/21/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    veeery bad. Invoke keyword is not helping much - power level of this card is low

    0
  • mogg's Avatar
    90 10 Posts Joined 06/01/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    At 4 mana, too costly unless Galakrond ends up being powerful

    0
  • Narfi's Avatar
    175 148 Posts Joined 03/23/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    I think this will see play in Warlock and Warrior, but not Priest or Rogue.

    0
  • UnGoroh's Avatar
    130 49 Posts Joined 07/26/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Shield is meant to be in every galakrond deck, this isn't. It's not great anyways

    0
  • liontail's Avatar
    Draconically Dedicated 210 277 Posts Joined 09/04/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    cost is way too much for an invoke..2/2 rush and waste turn 4..won't be seeing this crap in any deck..

    0
  • Svintusevich's Avatar
    Draconically Dedicated 185 153 Posts Joined 05/28/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Right now this card looks not that strong but we need to see all the expansion cards to decide how bad or good it is. We might have to play this one if there is not enough invoke cards.

    0
  • PipoHs's Avatar
    Vampire 220 142 Posts Joined 11/22/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    pack filler, slow, bad stats

    no way this seeing play

     

    0
  • Meteorite12's Avatar
    670 696 Posts Joined 05/29/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Not that great, but Galakrond’s effect might be good enough to run it anyways.

    Who needs consistency when you could have fun?

    0
  • ssaabbuu's Avatar
    225 210 Posts Joined 08/01/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Just an average card. Might be good for removal of threatening minions while invoking your Galakrond.

    0
  • Freforos's Avatar
    Draconically Dedicated 330 320 Posts Joined 11/21/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    I like this card better than the 4/5 taunt invoke minion, but rated both of them 2/5 stars.

    The card will see play just because you need invoke to make Galakrond stronger, at least this card remove something small and comes one turn earlier than the 4/5.

    I'd actually vote the 4/5 1 star and this 2 stars now that i reflected a bit about it, oh well.

    0
  • vprr's Avatar
    Face Collector 560 209 Posts Joined 03/31/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    As of now I can see Rogue, Warrior and Warlock playing this card. However I do not see this making the cut in Priest. 

    Depending on how many Invoke cards there are, this card might see play out of necessity rather than power level. 

    0
  • Juan73908's Avatar
    Magma Rager 290 157 Posts Joined 11/28/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Meh card, but invoke can be quite good. Not the worst Invoke card but I expect better

    0
  • IlBelTia's Avatar
    Wizard 440 333 Posts Joined 06/01/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    Ewww... His stats are so terrible... Even in a Galakrond deck this guy could never fit...

    0
  • FuriousBeagle's Avatar
    105 31 Posts Joined 12/01/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    This looks like the worst card of this set.even though ı think invoke is op this just seems umderpowered

    -1
  • padoru's Avatar
    Explorer of Outland 180 154 Posts Joined 12/02/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    this is so bad lmfao no way this is run unless there are only like 4 invoke cards

    -1
  • DarkFrostX's Avatar
    Old God Fanatic 830 1229 Posts Joined 07/26/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    Yeah, invoking those 2 imps changes the perspective of this card.

    1
  • Guenh's Avatar
    Devoted Academic 725 633 Posts Joined 05/28/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    I think this card will only see play if there are no other invoking cards available or if invoke will be a broken mecchanic. 4 Mana for a 2/2 rush is quite expensive

    0
  • meisterz39's Avatar
    925 1200 Posts Joined 06/03/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    4 mana deal 2 to a minion is awful, and invoking isn't valuable enough to make this good.

    0
  • YourPrivateNightmare's Avatar
    Skeleton 2010 4741 Posts Joined 03/25/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    well well, looks like this is a necessary evil at this point. With only 2 neutral invokers you're basically forced to run this (in any class other than Shaman) for Galakrond to be consistent.

    Priest can maybe get away with not playing it purely on the basis that both Galakrond and the Dragon aren't really something you wanna slam as fast as possible.

    Warrior is probably the best off because it's 5-damage for 4-mana.

    Warlock and Rogue got absolutely shafted by this, it's such a huge tempo loss.

    I tried having fun once.

    It was awful.

    1
  • b4timert's Avatar
    165 151 Posts Joined 11/05/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    before i knew what invoke did i laughed at how bad it looked

    0
  • Mahobear8's Avatar
    355 284 Posts Joined 03/22/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    Low stats, but may see play in decks attempted to rush max strength galakrond on 7

    0
  • JFK's Avatar
    Curious Pair 1070 621 Posts Joined 07/31/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago
    Quote From YourPrivateNightmare

    well well, looks like this is a necessary evil at this point. With only 2 neutral invokers you're basically forced to run this (in any class other than Shaman) for Galakrond to be consistent.

    Priest can maybe get away with not playing it purely on the basis that both Galakrond and the Dragon aren't really something you wanna slam as fast as possible.

    Warrior is probably the best off because it's 5-damage for 4-mana.

    Warlock and Rogue got absolutely shafted by this, it's such a huge tempo loss.

    Agreed. I think Rogue is even worse than Warlock here, since WL at least immediately gets stuff on board.

    0
  • Farfelee's Avatar
    Draconically Dedicated 400 151 Posts Joined 11/21/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    One of the weakest invoke card but since all Galakrond classes have access to 2 class invoke cards and 2 neutral invoke cards, you don't have much flexibility and might as well include this maniac.

    More dragons? Yes please!

    0
  • MenacingBagel's Avatar
    Zombie Chow 815 723 Posts Joined 09/24/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    Well I guess in shaman this won't be too bad since its 4 for 4 damage across multiple bodies the rest seem shabby though

    Self proclaimed good at battlegrounds

    0
  • Haffax733's Avatar
    Devoted Outlander 1035 297 Posts Joined 04/02/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    This card looks weak compared to Shield of Galakrond. It will definitely see less play than the latter, but may fit into decks that aim to invoke Galakrond as soon as possible.

    0
  • magikman's Avatar
    285 152 Posts Joined 06/17/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    A 4 mana 2/2 is probably too weak to be played, even with Rush and even with the Invoke effect attached. I’m struggling to imagine what this could even kill amongst the 2- and 3-cost minions that would be played leading up to turn 4.

    Jaina is best waifu. Always.

    0
  • Doublebuttered's Avatar
    145 140 Posts Joined 12/05/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    Yea the card is pretty weak but it might still be played just to ensure you get to the 4 invoke threshold for galakronds full effect

    0
  • CuakOn's Avatar
    1070 296 Posts Joined 11/21/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    Not a very good card.  Maybe it's good for Zoolock because you summon two 1/1 imps. 

    -1
  • leitong's Avatar
    220 147 Posts Joined 03/25/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    2/2 rush is just so underwhelming even with classes with strong invoke effect.

    0
  • Torgal's Avatar
    Draconically Dedicated 1000 293 Posts Joined 06/01/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    It invokes, but stats are horrible. Galakrond definitely has better invokers than this crap.

    Fun and interactive game.

    0
  • spy2395's Avatar
    800 174 Posts Joined 08/22/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    this card is so bad, but we need to invoke 

    0
  • TheWanderer's Avatar
    Funnel Cakes 200 157 Posts Joined 09/09/2019
    Posted 4 years, 10 months ago

    Such a terrible rush minion. Weak and unplayable I dare say.

    -1
  • og0's Avatar
    Red Riding Hood 1570 1062 Posts Joined 03/31/2019
    Posted 4 years, 8 months ago
    Quote From og0

    Pack filler?  Perhaps I just don't understand what deck this would be good in.

    This is why I am excellent at reviewing cards. 

    The only thing is you need to take the exact opposite of what I think and go with that confident you will be correct.

    All generalizations are false.

    0
  • Leave a Comment

    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign in here.