Comments

• Inconspicuosaurus

  Posted 5 years ago

  Hilarious that this was voted so low and then turned out to be a staple for over a year.

• randomfan

  Posted 5 years, 2 months ago

  Doing some achievement hunting today and it makes me chuckle seeing the initial reaction to this card. This one turned out to be a staple invoke card.

• MurlocAggroB

  Posted 5 years, 4 months ago

  It's so funny looking back on people's reactions to this card. Turns out, it's probably the best Invoker. Some board control and another effect is all you need when you're just trying to fill synergy. The only decks that don't use this are slower Priest and Warlock ones.

  It's the Disciple of C'Thun effect. The only reason C'Thun worked is because it had a fast, reactive synergy card.

• Fyrfytr998

  Posted 5 years, 5 months ago

  I liked her when Shaman wasn’t nerfed.

• StormCountTwo

  Posted 6 years, 2 months ago

  Although some invoke goes nice with this, the plain body value of it is too low—the 2 health doesn't really matter anyway as these rush minions are usually made to die.

• Torgal

  Posted 6 years, 2 months ago

  It invokes, but stats are horrible. Galakrond definitely has better invokers than this crap.

• CuakOn

  Posted 6 years, 2 months ago

  Not a very good card.  Maybe it's good for Zoolock because you summon two 1/1 imps. 

• kevin

  Posted 6 years, 2 months ago

  4 mana 2/2 rush is weak, i don't like the invoke mechanic neutral cards because it limit the other 4 classes of options, but if the galakrond decks need some invoke cards, they will use it even if is bad.

• LevityLovely

  Posted 6 years, 2 months ago

  bad card but without much option will see play 

• Trimutius

  Posted 6 years, 2 months ago

  Maybe, just maybe good enough in Warrior, other than that trash

• infiniteclock

  Posted 6 years, 2 months ago

  Even in a Galakrond deck, this card is just a filler, doesn't seem too good

• RenanFolk

  Posted 6 years, 3 months ago

  really  bad stats, will see how good is galakron

• Guenh

  Posted 6 years, 3 months ago

  I think this card will only see play if there are no other invoking cards available or if invoke will be a broken mecchanic. 4 Mana for a 2/2 rush is expensive

• Subzero

  Posted 6 years, 3 months ago

  4 mana deal 2 damage invoke? Yeah trash.
  Not even the dagern decks will run this.

• YourWaifu

  Posted 6 years, 3 months ago

  Why would you play this?

  Not even the invoke tag would justify playing this abomination.

  Its either the sleepiest card of all expansions or its just plain garbage.

  I am betting on the latter one.

• Arturvf89

  Posted 6 years, 3 months ago

  It may be necessary in some Galacron decks, but I hope they can do better than a 4 mana 2/2 rush. Even considering that the invokes can be priced at 1.5 mana, its at best a 2 mana 2/2 rush, very underwelming.

• dapperdog

  Posted 6 years, 3 months ago

  Will only see play if there are no other invoking cards available. Its decent in all the Galakrond decks shown except in priest since it will most likely result in a somewhat small tempo swing when played.

  Its rare for a card that carries the new keyword to be designed so ridiculously weak that it never sees play. Don't think there's going to be any more new neutral invoke cards to be revealed, but I damn well hope I'm wrong.

• Trapzter

  Posted 6 years, 3 months ago

  at 3 mana this could see play. 2atk rush is ok but not powerful and for 4 mana i don't expect this to see play really

• DarkFrostX

  Posted 6 years, 3 months ago

  If you ignore that the invoke will trigger galakrons ability, this has really bad stats.

• Mahobear8

  Posted 6 years, 3 months ago

  Seems ok, but fairly underwhelming