Legends of Runeterra is getting a major patch focused on card balance, expeditions, removing win-trading, and more!
Patch 0.9.0 releases this Tuesday, February 18th, at 9:30am PT!
This is a huge patch so we've recapped the important points below. If you want to see the full notes, including Riot's commentary on the card changes, read on further below.
Please note that card changes are not yet live in our database. They will go live after the patch releases.
Quick Patch Notes
- Fearsome is on Riot's watchlist due to them having similar concerns which prompted Elusive changes.
- Control as an archetype is being watched since this patch focuses on Aggro and Midrange tools. They don't want Control to get out of control.
- Cards that are generated now tells both players what created them.
- Tweaks were made to a few Expedition archetypes to help diversify picks.
- FPS options were added to the client for PC players. 30/60, 60, and 60+ are your options. The old default was 30/60.
- Deck importing and exporting now make use of the device clipboard.
- League of Legends gift cards are now redeemable in Legends of Runeterra.
Experience Changes
- Experience earned in Expeditions has been nerfed because they were the best way to earn XP.
- Experience earned by winning Constructed games has lower penalties for playing lots of games each day.
- Experience earned by challenging Friends no longer count towards your first win of the day bonus. XP capped at 5 wins per day.
Quick Card Changes
There are 15 card changes in Runeterra patch 0.9.0 Some are buffs, some are nerfs, and some are in-between.
Buffed Cards
- Lux now has 4 power and 5 health. (Up from 3 & 4)
- Lux now has 5 power and 6 health. (Up from 4 & 5)
- Yasuo now requires 5+ units to be stunned or recalled. (Down from 6)
- Arena Battlecaster now has 2 health. (Up from 1)
- Crimson Curator now has 3 health. (Up from 2)
- Jeweled Protector now has 4 power and 4 health. (Up from 3 & 3)
- Scuttlegeist now has Fearsome.
- Tortured Prodigy now has 4 power. (Up from 3)
Nerfed Cards
- Back to Back now costs 6. (Up from 5)
- Deny now costs 4. (Up from 3)
- Kinkou Lifeblade now has 2 health. (Down from 3)
- Rhasa the Sunderer now costs 8. (Up from 7)
- Wraithcaller No longer has Fearsome.
Card Changes
- Inspiring Mentor now has 2 health but no longer gives a health buff to ally in-hand. (Up from 1 health)
- Commander Ledros now has 9 power and costs 9 and states the Nexus Health is rounded up. (Up from 8 * 8)
Important - Riot's Approach to Balance with New Set Releases
Riot's Live Balance Lead, RubinZoo, had this to say on their plan for balance changes when new sets are concerned.
Quote From RubinZoo Additionally, we plan to approach balance with a seasonal mindset, adjusting our methods as the meta goes through different stages between sets of new cards. Once we’re out of beta and get into our regular cadence of releasing new sets, it should look something like this:
- New set of cards released.
- First balance patch: mostly “medium”-sized number changes based on our early sense of outliers.
- Second balance patch: Significant updates to underutilized cards, and the main patch where you can expect any major champion updates.
- Third balance patch: Limited number changes to stabilize any meta issues.
- Next set of cards released.
Just to be clear, this is a pretty loose framework (so be ready for some exceptions), but it generally describes our intent to make sure card changes support the experience of discovering all the possibilities of a new set and meta.
Official Patch Notes - Runeterra Patch 0.9.0
Quote From Riot Games Patch 0.9.0 brings with it the first card updates of open beta, along with tweaks to XP and Expeditions rewards. We’ve also got Dev Notes covering our approach to balance in Set 1, as well as ways we’re planning to address player feedback regarding the UI, deckbuilder, the speed of in-game animations.
Dev Notes
Balance & Set 1
Since this patch includes the first balance updates of the beta (and many players’ first balance update since starting LoR), we’d like to briefly recap our goals and how you can expect to see them manifest over the several patches that happen between new card releases.
When we look at balance in LoR and consider changes, we have some high-level, aspirational targets we use to guide our long-term efforts:
- Every champion should have a deck where they're the best fit and their “dream” can be realized.
- Non-champion cards should have at least one deck where they're a good option.
- Regions should have at least one competitively viable deck.
- The meta should support the widest possible array of competitively viable decks.
While buffing cards in pursuit of these targets is the fun part, we will also power down cards where necessary. When we do, we want to avoid over-nerfs (cards and their archetypes / decks should remain playable) as well as minimize collateral damage to cards or decks that aren’t the actual target of a given change. We fully plan to monitor changes, rather than drop them and forget, and will make further tweaks in future patches as needed.
Additionally, we plan to approach balance with a seasonal mindset, adjusting our methods as the meta goes through different stages between sets of new cards. Once we’re out of beta and get into our regular cadence of releasing new sets, it should look something like this:
- New set of cards released.
- First balance patch: mostly “medium”-sized number changes based on our early sense of outliers.
- Second balance patch: Significant updates to underutilized cards, and the main patch where you can expect any major champion updates.
- Third balance patch: Limited number changes to stabilize any meta issues.
- Next set of cards released.
Just to be clear, this is a pretty loose framework (so be ready for some exceptions), but it generally describes our intent to make sure card changes support the experience of discovering all the possibilities of a new set and meta.
- RubinZoo, Live Balance Lead
UI, Deckbuilder, and Animations
We’ve heard a bunch of player feedback regarding UX and usability issues. We’ve already started to address this with what we’re working on now, including some small changes with this patch.
In particular, you’ve let us know about issues with deckbuilder, and we know it’s important that we get that experience to a higher quality. We’ve got a few improvements in this patch, and down the line you can expect to see a redesign of how card counts are displayed, as well as how many cards you’re able to see on the screen at once. In the future, we’ll also look at how we display your various currencies and wildcards, and ways to make crafting cards easier.
Throughout the beta, we’ve been on the lookout for ways to make gameplay snappier and more responsive, and the length of some animations has come up as something we can improve. We want our game to look good, of course, but it also needs to feel good, and we don’t want visual effects to feel excessive in a way that obstructs gameplay. In upcoming patches you'll see both sped-up animations and increased freedom to make moves without being blocked by in-progress animations.
Thanks so much for your feedback, your patience, and help making LoR awesome.
- Teemopalooza, Principal UX Designer
Card Updates
Champions
Lux’s weaker statline made it a little too difficult to utilize her as a linchpin, “build-around-me” card. Buffing her stats will help her ability to both stick around as an engine and act as a meaningful threat on her own.
- Yasuo (Level 1)
- You Stun or Recall 6+ units -> You Stun or Recall 5+ units
While testing Ionia changes internally, we found that Yasuo was catching collateral damage from changes aimed at elusive and handbuff decks. Inspiring Mentor was one of the best cards to utilize while leveling up Yasuo, and together with Deny would provide pivotal protection (extra important when heavily building around Yasuo). We’ve also found Yasuo often difficult to level up in Expeditions, especially when not paired with Noxus. This quest buff should address both issues.
Followers & Spells
- Back to Back
- Cost: 5 -> 6
One of the things we love about LoR is that combat tricks are very playable in our constructed format, which really contributes to compelling, interactive gameplay moments. That said, Back to Back can be a huge blowout Burst-speed trick that often leaves opponents without profitable avenues for playing around it. We like this kind of effect, but such a swingy card ultimately warrants a higher cost.
- Arena Battlecaster
- Health: 1 -> 2
Battlecaster isn’t seeing a ton of use, so it’s getting a small buff to help it line up better with other two-drops and make it a more compelling option for Noxus decks.
- Crimson Curator
- Health: 2 -> 3
“Battle Scars” decks have been underperforming, and the Noxus side of the theme has been a bit one-dimensional. Improving Crimson Curator should increase both options and viability for these decks.
- Deny
- Cost: 3 -> 4
Deny is moving from watchlist to changelist after rigorous internal testing and debate. While there are good arguments for Deny to exist at three mana, ultimately it’s proven too prevalent and disruptive to the metagame, heavily restricting viable card options.
When testing this change internally, we found that play patterns involving Deny tended to feel more fair. Holding up Deny now always costs at least one mana per turn that you’d otherwise use to develop your board, a cost that makes for more involved decision making than when Deny was fully castable with spell mana.
- Inspiring Mentor
- Health: 1 -> 2
- Text: "Play: Grant an ally in hand + 1|1" -> "Play: Grant an ally in hand + 1|0"
Inspiring Mentor was providing too much curve efficiency and resilience to Ionia decks, with the stats granted to the buffed unit often overly protecting them by putting them out of range of similarly-costed removal. Curving Inspiring Mentor into one or even two 4|3 Navori Conspirators was too powerful a play pattern considering its consistency. With this change, we’re ensuring an intended weakness of elusive units—their low health—can be more exploitable.
- Jeweled Protector
- Power: 3 -> 4
- Health: 3 -> 4
This change is complementary to the one made to Inspiring Mentor, as we don’t want to over-nerf the “Handbuff” archetype. Shifting power from Mentor to Protector (and into later parts of the game) should increase deckbuilding options and give opponents a bit more time to react or set up their own game plans.
- Kinkou Lifeblade
- Health: 3 -> 2
We previously mentioned that we’ve been keeping an eye on Elusive strategies, and working to identify any specific candidates to adjust. One of the intended weaknesses of Elusive decks is that fast decks should be able to effectively race them, since Elusive units are naturally smaller and less cost efficient. Kinkuo Lifeblade often closed that door on what should be a fundamental weakness of the deck, so we’re adjusting its stats to decrease blocking power and make it easier for opposing decks to answer.
- Commander Ledros
- Cost: 8 -> 9
- Power: 8 -> 9
- Text: "Play: Cut the enemy Nexus Health in half." -> "Play: Cut the enemy Nexus Health in half, rounded up."
- Blade of Ledros
- Text: "Cut the enemy Nexus Health in half." -> "Cut the enemy Nexus Health in half, rounded up."
Commander Ledros is an extremely powerful game-ending bomb that also acts as a recursive threat, and is flexible to boot, offering both excellent stabilization in close games and close-out potential for aggro decks that might’ve otherwise come up short. Overall, Ledros was a bit too good at “undoing” whatever previously happened in a game, especially for a card that doesn’t require any synergy to be effective. A card that does so much should incur a higher opportunity cost and provide opponents more room to win before and after it’s dropped, so we’re bumping its cost up to nine, which will not only delay Ledros’ arrival but also allow less flexibility when recasting it. To partially compensate, we’re bumping Ledros’ power by one—if it connects, it should be ending the game.
- Rhasa the Sunderer
- Cost: 7 -> 8
Rhasa offers consistent blowout potential across many matchups, and the required setup is cheap to achieve in Shadow Isles. This often makes Rhasa difficult for opponents to profitably play around, and can leave them in a rough state where they know they’re going to get Rhasa’ed but there’s not much they can do about it. The rate was just too favorable, so we’re bumping Rhasa up to eight mana in order to give opponents more room to play against it.
- Scuttlegeist
- Now has "Fearsome"
- Tortured Prodigy
- Power: 3 -> 4
We’re removing some raw power from Shadow Isles with our other changes, as it’s just doing too many things too well. On the other hand, we do want to help players build more synergy-driven Shadow Isles decks, so we’re providing small buffs to Scuttlegeist and Tortured Prodigy to make them more compelling options for those kinds of decks.
- Wraithcaller
- Removed "Fearsome"
Wraithcaller has been a dominant value card for Fearsome-based decks—the combination of two bodies, boosting all Mistwraiths, and evasion made this among the most efficient cards in LoR. Considering the free Mistwraith already comes with Fearsome, we’re cutting the keyword from Wraithcaller to reduce the amount of evasion and overall value it puts on the board.
The Watchlist
Fearsome
LoR is built around a central pattern of interactive, interesting combats. One of the reasons we were keeping an eye on Elusive decks and ultimately made some changes is that when firing on all cylinders, they removed much of that interactivity. In large concentrations, Fearsome can have a similar impact—once it becomes very difficult to block, the points of interaction shrink and a lot of the interesting back-and-forth in the game disappears. For now, we think the changes in this patch plus some existing tools provide enough counterpressure on Fearsome, but we’ll be keeping an eye on those units and their supporting cards.
Control
Collectively, the card updates in this patch represent a general reduction in the power of tools that aggressive and midrange decks have to combat control strategies (specifically, ways to reach inevitability). While control decks haven’t been problematic so far during beta, we’ll be keeping an eye out to see if they’ve been overly powered up by these changes or their consequences.
Clarity
We’ve heard feedback that it can be hard to tell whether units’ effects allow opponents to react or not, so we’ve added that info to tooltips.
- Units with effects that allow opponent reactions now have a “Skills” icon next to "Play" or "Attack" in the card text.
- Hovering on the icon will bring out a tooltip explaining that the Skill allows opponent reactions before resolving.
- Units with effects that do not allow opponent reactions will not have this icon.
- Created cards now have a tooltip that tells both players what created them.
Expedition Archetypes
We’re pretty happy with the diversity of strategies and archetypes that can perform well in Expeditions, but are making some tweaks to a few outliers.
Demacian Steel has been consistently overperforming due to a full roster of units with strong statlines, so we’re adding in a common card that’s on the weaker side but mixes up what this archetype brings to the table.
- Added: Chain Vest
Battle Scars has proven great at pumping up the Power of its units, but could have a tough time actually closing out games, so the addition of Might will allow those units to go over the top of opposing blockers. Alpha Wildclaw is also being swapped in for Bull Elnuk to give the archetype a stronger late game.
- Added: Might, Alpha Wildclaw
- Removed: Blood for Blood, Bull Elnuk
Suit Up has also been overperforming due to the consistency of Challenger units backed up by Frostbite and Barriers, so we’re enabling the Battle Scars changes by making the opposite unit swap here.
- Added: Bull Elnuk
- Removed: Alpha Wildclaw
Shroom and Boom has been struggling lately, leading us to remove some underperforming cards like Get Excited!, which isn’t as exciting when you’re hoping to use your Mushroom Clouds to actually put shrooms in the opposing deck. In their place we’re adding Assembly Bot and Plaza Guardian to reward you for casting Mushroom Clouds, as well as Statikk Shock as a flexible removal spell that helps you not run out of cards.
- Added: Assembly Bot, Statikk Shock, Plaza Guardian
- Removed: Academy Prodigy, Chempunk Shredder, Get Excited!
Finally, we’ve also made some minor improvements to the way the shopkeeper selects trades, so you’ll more often be offered compelling choices.
- Shopkeeper trade logic improved.
XP & Expeditions Rewards
“Play the way you want to play” is an incredibly important goal for our progression systems—we want players to feel LoR respects their time regardless of whether they prefer to climb Ranked or jam AI games. With the help of your feedback, we identified some tuning issues that encouraged players to play in ways they might not want to simply because it was the optimal way to get XP.
First up, end-of-trial bonus XP was too high relative to other modes. The bonus XP is meant to account for the slower pace of Expeditions matches and time spent drafting, but it was so high that it was really just the optimal way to grind XP. We don’t players to feel forced to grind Expeditions to build up their collections, so we’re reducing the XP granted when completing a trial.
End-of-trial XP reduced:
- 0 wins: 100 -> 50
- 1 win: 300 -> 150
- 2 wins: 500 -> 250
- 3 wins: 700 -> 400
- 4 wins: 900 -> 600
- 5 wins: 1200 -> 800
- 6 wins: 1500 -> 1000
- 7 wins: 2000 -> 1500
To complement this change, we’re tweaking daily adjustments to PVP win XP to help out folks looking to heavily grind XP or just play a ton. We want to make sure constructed PVP wins always offer a reward, and that players don’t feel forced to play AI matches just because they’re out of PVP XP for the day.
Reduced XP adjustments for daily PVP wins - you’ll now receive more XP at high numbers of PVP wins in one day, and will always receive at least 100 XP for constructed PVP wins.
- Base PVP win XP: 200 in Normal / Ranked, 100 in Expeditions (no change)
- 1-10 wins: full XP (no change)
- 11-15 wins: -50 XP → full XP
- 16-20 wins: -100 XP (no change)
- 21-30 wins: -150 XP → -100 XP
- 31+ wins: -200 XP → -100 XP
We’re also re-designed the XP structure for Friend Challenge. While we want matches against friends to be rewarding, the previous values overly encouraged snap concessions and win / loss trading to reap full PvP XP.
- Friend Challenge wins now grant 100 XP for the first 5 wins, and 0 XP for 6+.
- Friend Challenges losses / ties now grant 0 XP.
- Friend Challenge matches no longer count towards daily PVP wins / losses or first wins of the day bonuses. They still count for quest progress.
Moving on to Expeditions rewards, we’ve heard some frustration that a 6-win run rewarded only 33% of the Shards (1000) needed to play another Expedition. While we believe overall Expedition rewards are in a good spot, we’re shifting some of the rewarded Shards from 7 wins to 6 wins to make sure the latter achievement still feels appropriately rewarding.
- 6-win Expeditions reward now 1500 shards (was 1000), as well as a random champion card and golden chest (unchanged).
- 7-win Expeditions reward now 3000 shards (was 3500), as well as a champion capsule (unchanged).
PC FPS Options
On PC-only, we’ve added an FPS option in the settings menu. The drop-down has three settings:
- 30/60: The previous default, with 30 FPS during non-interactive moments and 60 FPS during interactive ones (grabbing and moving cards, etc.). Balances battery consumption and responsiveness while interacting with cards, so we recommend this setting for battery-operated devices.
- 60: Locks framerate at 60 FPS. Roughly doubles battery consumption compared to 30/60.
- 60+: The game will try to run as fast as possible, up to 240 FPS. Will drain batteries very quickly. Some animations may run faster than intended, which can lead to rare crashes when rapidly navigating through the client.
Miscellaneous
- Deckbuilder improvements
- Mana curve now indicates number of cards at each cost.
- Bugfix for “MAX” card count text not showing up.
- Deck import & export now copies from/to device clipboard.
- Minor visual polish and readability improvements.
- Board visuals
- Corrected a repeated grass texture on Summoner's Rift board.
- Cleaned up and reduced intensity of lens flare effect on Demacia board.
- Corrected occasional lighting issues when resolving certain spells on faction boards.
- Players on old client versions will now see a message asking them to restart the client and update, and will be unable to queue until doing so.
- Master tier rankings now more fluid based on how master players are performing against each other (previously released hotfix).
- Claimable rewards on region roads now more strongly highlighted.
- Patch sizes generally decreased.
- Friend Challenge stability improvements.
- Store now marked with a badge when new content is available.
- League of Legends gift cards are now redeemable in LoR.
- In-client messaging for maintenance updated for clarity.
Bugfixes
- Players should no longer get stuck on the loading screen when signing out of League of Legends while signed into LoR.
- Players logging into LoR from different devices should encounter fewer crashes.
- Fixed issues with region quests not progressing as expected.
- Fixed rare issues with players not receiving XP after games.
- MASSIVE nerf to high APMers: Players can no longer discard the same card to multiple Spinning Axes by quickly chaining them (previously released hotfix).
- Anivia’s summoned from deck will now correctly level up if her condition has been met.
- Players should no longer get stuck on "Connecting" if their opponent disconnects while loading.
Comments
your reply is stupid blizzard hate. Yes more resurces are better and selling mostly/only cosmetics are better too but a Real game that gets played as a main game every day needs something to bind the player Hs does that with money investment it catches me every time Back because i spent 5k+ LoR and other games spamm you full with rewards for doing nothing dont catches me... and not beiing able to buy everything is also not good for a player like me. only 3 Champion Wildcards per week lel if i want spent all my money let me ! and if i do that give me my dust back...
now i spent money and have a slightly weaker deck and get nothing back. The result out of that is: I Quit the game untili waste more.
In Hs you pay and you have it forever and if it gets nerfed you get Full Value back so you lost nothing and a normal Intellectual Player spends usually 130-250bucks per expansion and have everything from that and then never opens packs from that expansion. so if cards get nerfed you get back everything for the next expansion to spend less there.
f2p games dont catch it is not fun to get everything blown in your ass for free...
And the best is what happens if you have all regions on max lvl? you not even get a resource out of winning you only get exp... so nothing stores on the bank..
You and I have a very different idea on what a normal Intellectual Player spends...
"stupid Blizzard hate".. like there are not enough reasons to despite the Blizzard model, you are stating exactly what is wrong in hearthstone, you are playing the game cause you already invested a lot into it, also you don't get refunds for all that gets nerfed only the specific cards that got nerfed let's say you crafted Zentimo for galakround shaman before the second wave of nerfs, where is the refund? , zentimo also rotates in 2 months (3 when the deck got nerfed).
I don't see why would you want to spend money just because.. I also have some money put into HS, I bought preorders for 1 year, and It still feels bad to craft anything cause it might get nerfed and YOU WON'T GET YOUR DUST BACK.. if they nerf a common or a rare you don't get the dust for the epics and legendaries that are core to the deck.. that's why the refunding policy is BAD and also is the core problem of the economy.. if it had a mmore generous economy balance changes could happen more often and have a better meta.
Why is spending 600 bucks a year on a game legit? and what does it has to do with intellect? if anything it shows addiction and lack of foresight.. You can buy like 20 indie games in steam instead btw and 7 triple A games.. but no, let's buy some packs.. I made the same mistake as you when I was working and had money(now I am a student if you are wondering) but not anymore...
your problem and the problem of alle the other rank 50 players here is that you dont see this:
and let me say it again... You Spent fucking 130-250 bucks per expansion have gold from doing all quests every 3 days and a little bit from winning to grinding legend and then you have everything from that expansion.
in DoD i preoderd both bundles and had 9k gold and i have every card my only missing legendary is Murozond and he is bad.
So WHY craft cards for decks that get nerfed? Who needs something like crafting cards? much better is i dont disentchanted duplicates after DoD release and dissed only what got nerfed. i also crafted Golden Alex and golden Kronx before Pack opening because i have so much dust. and Why i have that? because i am paying? Yes and because i am Smart and i dont click the disentchant button.
and again if you dont spend money on another games that have paid Content 130bucks every 4 month are okay for a game you love.
if you have started Hs in middle of a year and try grinding shit from previous expansions thats hard for sure but you can then play Arena and wait for rotation. or buy packs... but thats not blizzards fault it is your fault for beginning a game in a late state.
and more balance changes is another topic that noobs crie for you have never a stable and good meta if so much changes happen in short time like now.. it is bad for a game from a Good player perspective to dont have a meta that sttles never you need that stable meta to progress better. but that too much for you i know so i leav that here and hope blizz never hears to stupid noobs that never reached legend more than one time...
I play since naxx lol, I have a large collection, but it still feels like a scam every time I craft anything.
I don't think spending 130 bucks every 3 months is ok.
LoR promotes the skill of players above their ability to spend money on the game.
My other big problem is that I cna't recomend my friends to play the game cause they are not dumb enough to fall into thsi spending trap.. sorry not everyone have that much spare money...
LoR doesnt promotes skill since it has a meta like Hs and you need that decks and cards and you need a point of begining if you want grind for f2p cards. if your point of beginning (example the evasive burn deck) got nerfed and you got 0 refunds for that nerf it feels bad to play it and you have no shards and not enough wildcards to craft another deck. so what you can do? pay? no you have a pay limit each week.. your only way is to play a nerfed deck and that never feels good...
And skill is not grinding exp with a bad deck... skill is winning more with a full collection as other players with that same collection.
and last but not least if you play since naxx why do you need to craft cards? you has managed your resources bad. I have friends in Hs they play only f2p and never do grinding full 100g and forget sometimes do quests and they are sometimes top 100 when i play less and am top 200-500 so f2p in Hs is possible.
and for your Zentimo fail:
Zentimo in Galakrond warri was played after the first nerf if you are dumb enough to craft it for a deck that was nerfed and is still powerfull on a time when everyone know that another nerf wave will arrive sometimes its your fault.
It's ok I got like 10 other decks I can play one month in, in hs you maybe have another deck if you disenchant the nerfed deck.
Also the deck is still VERY playable, so 1. it's not a bad deck and 2. I am not stuck with it because I have more resources.
You missed my point about promoting skill and deck building skills, if most players have full collection or near full collection (which is a realistic goal in LoR and an unrealistic one in HS), you are tested by your ability to build decks (or copy them.. I guess) and pilot/adjust them to the meta in HS you want to tech in Harrison Jones? great pay 1600 dust for it (I have all classic cards it's just an example).
Did Blizzard communicate about galakround shaman getting nerfed AGAIN? I don't think so.. also the deck looked very fun I would craft it if not for the fact Zentimo is rotating out... that sort of nerfing is quite dumb as well Shaman isn't seen at all right now..
In conclusion my point is that refunds are bad for the game if you have better economy to begin with you don't need them, I appreciate Riot's point of view much more than Blizzard's.
it was a long time ago, but i now have something to say...
every good player in Hs has known that Galakrond Shaman gets another nerf because the first nerfs where not enough. If you didnt saw this you are simply bad and should quit and play hello kitty online...
Taking XP out of Expeditions and putting into the later grinding sessions of PvP wins screws over those of us who don't play enough each week. I play my one Expedition a week, plus a couple games a day; I'll never hit the full grinding session required to make up for the loss.
Admittedly it's not a huge amount by any stretch, but it will add up and cause people like me to get outpaced sooner :/
They didn't take that much XP out of Expeditions. If you were only playing one per week, you'll barely notice the difference. You can make up for it with just a few constructed wins. I certainly wouldn't call it a "full grinding session."
Also, people who wanted to outpace you were already doing so by grinding endless Expeditions, where there was never a daily or weekly XP cap. The difference now is that you have a choice of what mode to play if you want to grind infinite XP.
In the end everyone will have all regions unlocked and it won't matter at all.
You and me both. I think the ship has sailed on casuals v hardcores having relatively comparable collection sizes--but you already got way further ahead if you were exhausting your wildcard buys every week anyways, so I'm not sure it really matters in the big picture.
The big question now is: can you still be competitive with a smaller collection? Signs so far point to yes--they're extremely generous with the common and rare wildcards, and most competitive decks so far are ~70-90% commons and rares--but we won't know for sure until the meta matures.
I was under the impression that Riot's vision was more about paid-vs-unpaid, not casual-vs-hardcore.
I mean, it seems obvious to me that someone who plays more will always get more rewards than someone who plays less. To throttle things so severely that that's not the case will never be acceptable to the people who are enjoying the game the most.
As for the paid-vs-unpaid divide, I think that is also somewhat misunderstood. The idea is not to keep them completely even -- that is literally impossible as long as there are cards in the store. The idea is to make sure free players can get enough cards to have at least one or two viable decks fairly soon; I think they've succeeded in that mission.
This... I am a f2p player and feel I have viable decks. I will certainly not have all the options or the power of paying players, but that's the price I pay (or refuse to pay) by staying f2p. The fact that I am able to field decks that are competitive while not putting any money down yet is a credit to Riot's design (at least so far... it is still very early, but hopefully they can keep it going).
I mean... I'm not playing hardcore either, this past week was the first one I'd bothered to do anything but play Expedition to get my quests done, yet I have multiple competitive decks. Get a level 10+ vault each week, be decent at expedition and spend your wild cards wisely, you'll be fine
Wow! Thats a lot of changes all at once! Good on the team