All Comments

Quote From 07jonesj

Right, but we're not in a court of law. If I catch somebody in a lie, I don't have to wait for it to go through a jury to call them a liar.

So, exactly, what is the lie you have found? Not what you think is a lie, but that you can prove is a lie.

One of the better cards for Warrior so far this set. Let's you clear threats, trigger frenzies, and make big cards like Rattlegores many times better, AND it has Tradeable. 

Really boring, but also probably really good in some sort of Face Druid aggro deck. Tough to call a Legendary questline a sleeper, but I think this fits the bill.

This will be fun when you get it off, but I doubt you live long enough for that to happen. That said, Double Tidal Wave or similar cards will get you right back in the game once you're done. Won't be meta this expansion, but going to be interesting to see what spells the design over the next year.

This does too little the turn it gets played. Tradeable keyword saves it a bit, but doubt it takes up a spot in a deck.

This does a ton of damage for 2 mana and very good at any stage of the game. Miracle Rogue time!

Fits in really well with Deathrattle Demon Hunter, can even guarantee the other copy is in the deck from the Tradeable keyword.

Essentially Tracking, but paying an extra 2 mana, though you can possibly use several times in the same turn. Probably doesn't make the cut however.

Weak Sauce Resoundingly.

THIS IS WHAT??? This Is What?? this is what?

Whole Lotta Three.

Soda Preceded by a Nut.

Hey! A fellow Sentinel-enjoyer! Seriously, though, it seems like everyone else for whom I've seen any evidence of their choice, it was Ruination.

Great summary of the quests, thanks for posting it.

Probably best in duals with the deathrattle hero power. Otherwise seems to slow for standard. Maybe finds a spot in wild with all the deathrattle trigger effects Hunter has.

Less flashy than the other questlines, but I still think this can be a strong finisher depending on other "hero attack" support this expansion. 

Interesting removal/frenzy synergy. I can't wait to play with this.

I can see this being good. Nice strong finisher. Shaman is going to go pew pew!

This is nasty. Easy for Rogue draw most of the deck. This should see play.

Seems alright for Deathrattle DH. Renowned Performer might still be better though.

Legendary with a cheap cost and a fun effect ?!
There is potential for (combo) abuses, that is guaranteed!!

I barely see the point for Pally to run this, as they have better weaponry in their arsenal, but also less restrictive and more consistent healing tools.

Quote From dapperdog

It doesnt look all that good now, but no doubt further reveals will show why this card was printed at all.

On its own as a 4 drop weapon its fairly expensive as a value card but it still does hit face for 8 and that has got to count for something. The extra deathrattle value may be what really pushes this card over the edge as an excellent weapon.

Indeed! I cannot wait to have a full picture of the set to know which Deathrattle would be good accomplices for such effect

Quote From UVE

I love the flavour, but will not see any play in constructed.

Atleast is a funny packfiller with a trolden potential when is summoned with cards like Serpentshrine Portal.

Yeah, other than being the funniest of all the ogres printed so far, it is also the worse one of the lot.
I'm already hearing the sax playing as Two-Face Investor ruins your combo pieces

So just for clarification, nobody on the Hearthstone team is accused of anything right?

Now we'll have to deal with Fiends and Anetheron early on - gotta love big hands ^^

This is very weird when taken out of context, not gonna lie.

That's a misunderstanding of what the presumption of innocence is. 

The state is required to presume innocence. The state cannot arbitrarily declare guilt, but must prove it for the state to take any punitive actions.

For individuals to react, there is no legal or constitutional need to presume innocence.

Example, you witness your friend Bob get punched in the face by James Earl Jones. You are under no obligation to wait for there to be a declaration of guilt to say to other people "I saw James Earl Jones punch my friend." The people you tell can say "James Earl Jones punched this dude's friend." People can and will decide whether they believe that based on your credibility and the perceived character of James Earl Jones. At no point in there is anyone required to presume innocence.

Bob files charges. The state must presume innocence. They have to be able to prove it was James Earl Jones, that it was assault, etc. They can't say "this one person's word is good enough for me." 

But people, individuals, can and must. 

I know that to be the case. But discussing the problem at hand should be the bigger priority here. I assume that the community in this website are open-minded enough to know about the guilty until proven notion, I think that way too. But when something like suicide is included in the accusations, we need to talk more about what causes this in the first place so these allegations never happen to begin with.