Probably really bad, but looks fun to experiment with. If I open it, I will try it with the Neeru package. Imaging damaging you opponent with your own fatigue! Won't work at all but still!

Agree, seems very slow. At the stage in the game when you finally get the sweet spell damage +3, how much value is there still to squeeze from your deck?

Nice idea, although stolen from the contest here some weeks ago. :D

Lokks very interesting, the ability to deal 2 damage each turn without playing a card (Like Shadowform or Wildfire) is really nice. It doesn't have to be an aggro deck, maybe a control deck with less stalling/bs could use this. Will try if opened!

I tried to restart and it actally worked, thanks!

I have 3 copies, 2 from the wailing bundle and 1 from a Barrens pack. I was planning on dusting the 3:rd but I can only get 20 dust from it. =/

Quote From Alfi

Quote From Live4vrRdieTryn

At least I can rope and get my petty revenge on the ppl who get to enjoy normal luck. I wouldn't know what thats like

Roper. 

Have you ever considered, that maybe you deserve the really bad luck? You know, karma. 

Also, it's not their fault if you're unlucky. But if they rope themselves or play priest in that slow horrible way, I get it.

I never noticed that Scabbs are stealing from some other mercenaries in the Yoink! art. I sure hope Guff is old enough to drink!

I bought 10 wild packs on release just for fun, and got Kazakus. Inspired by this thread I tried buying standard packs, and got Magtheridon in my 4th. Also got my second Rancor.

Level 155, just collecting gold for next expansion.

Yeah I could probably do that anyway, fun card with decks that looks like fun from a lot of classes. And if so, maybe I'll craft that smelly quillboar as well. :D

Quote From Caro

Did not expect to see Al'ar in the refined DH deathrattle list. Just goes to show that old bad legendaries might become useful later on in Standard. 

I want to play that list... But crafting both Blackthorn and N'zoth might be too much

Got Barak Kodobane in my first pack, he was on my shortlist to craft so I'm happy! 

I will try out Freeze mage for sure... I'll also make use of the new Shaman cards for a spell/elemental deck with Bru'kan.

Arena with Shaman. Turn 4: Coin + Shadow Hunter Vol'jin, target Hog Rancher to swap it with my Scrapyard Colossus in hand. It was silenced right away but I still won a few turns later.

My other targets in hand were 2X Smug Senior and a Pen Flinger. So it was 25% chance of complete misplay but I was lucky this time. :)

I got Bru'kan from the pack, woohooo!!!

Reached lvl 100 today, chose Cenarion Malfurion as reward.

Feedback time!

Demonxz95:

grumpymonk:

Wailor:

anchorm4n:

Ilphelkiir:

linkblade91:

Nirast:

Hordaki:

R

Quote From linkblade91

allthehype - As the others have mentioned, you cannot place the cards in KFT and make direct references to spell schools. If I had to choose I would prefer the Renounce Darkness variant; I personally don't like either one, but it could be because my idea was to also make a mirror of RD...just not as blatant, frankly-speaking. We're both making 2-mana Shadow Paladin spells from KFT featuring Arthas; not saying it's on purpose, but it's gonna bug me on some level :/

In all honesty, it was your card that inspired me to try out the "Fall of Arthas" theme (one of my favorite pieces of lore). However, my intention was never to plagiarize or piggyback your idea and in my opinion the cards are different enough to stand on their own. But if you (and other voters/mods) consider my card too similar too yours I'd be happy to drop the idea. :)

As for the other feedback: It seems like the Renouce edition is more popular than the Lunacy edition. As for transforming the Holy spells into Shadow spells, that was something I also considered but dropped due to the small pool of options. But if I go with the Renounce idea this won't be as much of a problem compared with Lunacy. I'll probably go this way: Renounce edition into Shadow spells. Maybe change the mana cost to 1? And without the KFT watermark, of course.

I've got an idea but I'm not sure in which direction to take it. Here are my two first alternatives of the same flavor. TRIGGER WARNING: One is an iteration of Deck of Lunacy. The other is obviously inspired by Renounce Darkness but I think that card is associated with less PTSD. Yeah, in a way they are basically rip-offs, but I like the flavor and maybe it could work anyway?

The wording is chosen to affect spells in both your hand and deck.

Feedback appreciated: Which one is better? Frozen throne watermark OK? Balanced for its cost/rarity? Are they too unoriginal?

When you play a obvious meme deck made only for Paladin achievements and your opponent:

1 Plays Raza priest 

2 unnecessarily slowly,

3 mostly go face and

4 Flares your secrets.

Fuuuuuck....