I dont think the universe is working against me as much as I believe that the power of positive thinking will make it work toward me. Things happen around me. Good or bad and I notice them.
All of your problems in Hearthstone boil down to this excuse. Stop merely "hedging" and start making an effort to actually improve. Good players make their own "luck." (Sarcasm quotes because luck has nothing to do with it -- it only appears to be luck to those who don't know what's really going on.)
Obviously I should play around and draw RNG and my opponent discovering the perfect answer all the time. Obviously I'm just bad and not because it's a card game where most outcomes are based around luck and random generation that you or your opponent can do nothing about it but because "I should have played around it"
This was my free legendary. And just like someone else said i used it in a clunky deck that wasnt very good. But sometimes when I played him it was a decent swing. Still not gonna miss him when hes gone though, but I might keep the watch posts. For some reason my opponents think they do something.
If you autoconcede bad matchups in anything but casual, your mmr will have to suffer. Your legend rank will be stuck in 5 digits once you reach it. But if you don't care about the mmr, you get worse players, which means you can have more fun or queue into more homebrews with your tier 2 deck. So it's really up to your goals, nothing is wrong. But don't expect to ever get good at the game while playing bad players, or conceding turn 1.
People try to get good at this game? Where everything is random and little to no skill is involved? Lol
but if the alternative is to lose any long game cuz of c'thun or clowns, imo facing tickatus is better. u can win long games even against a warlock who played tickatus, you almost surely can't win against 3rd clown board, c'thun or similar. tickatus is the only thing that will counter control warrior if it will return f.e.
Dont tell this guy that those cards that he think warlock cant play are neutral cards than any class can play...
Jumped straight here to fully support a game mode with custom settings. House Rules. It is so much fun for, say, poker, and what would amount to user generated Tavern Brawls could be awesome. Budget restrictions (or not), highlander decks with no payoff cards, Nozdormu decks, etc. Oh, ETC in any class decks. Let's get wierd.
Probably super hard to make and implement, but it's exciting to think about. Let's get wierd.
Wierd. Weird. I am having a hard time with that word. Weerd. Wired.
If they cant implement a tournament mode, I wouldn't hold my breath for this.
This is the best take in this comment section imo. There are things I disagree with, like you saying she does not mean to target his income or get him fired. Which she would obviously know something like this would achieve. This is a good thing if true, but heinous if not.
You also mention that he should have responded earlier, and would have no need for legal action or a "real reason" to remain silent. If you look at what happened to slazzo, where he also waited months to respond to his allegations which we know now are not true. He was setting up a lot of proof since apology videos made without sense and without facts that are ready to be layed out people ignore. I dont think silence equals guilt, I think guilt equals guilt. Theres a reason we have the fifth amendment AND due process in america.
Well I am on mobile so I will gladly use that as an excuse to why I didnt find better research. I will read the links provided later and maybe make a response, but with just skimming seeing that last one is about south Africa I already doubt the legitimacy overall of at least that article.
The reason I posted the link on it's own was because I was tired of seeing people quote crime statistics from a well know article about false allegations from 2002-10 the linkis biased I'll give that lol, but it does include finding from an FBI study in 2012, which I did read through and is not as hilarious as you claim. Your articles though are from 2020, so I will read them later.
But the point wasnt that the link proved it was a false claim it was that it was possible. There are people who comment here that seem to believe it is never possible for a "victim" to recant their story or falsely accuse someone for their own gain and even though it is a clearly biased article. It does well to show that I felt.
There are many cases of false accusations where the accused feel the deck is stacked against them. Like with the 2006 North Carolina lacrosse player false accusation, or the Columbia 2014 mattress girl case. I'm not saying this automatically makes the man innocent. I'm just saying it's possible. Just like its possible there may be rain on a cloudy day. Just because it was just overcast doesnt mean the possibility of there being rain was zero.
If you feel like I do where these cases need as much validity and structure to where no one doubts the outcome. Then you would be on my side and hoping for a formal investigation. And not just believing a victim because they say they are a victim. Our society is built on helping victims which I think is a good thing. But it also opens the door for bad actors. Which cannot and should not be ignored and doing so just because someone makes a youtube video where they are crying is just negligence.
The amount of people putting words into the mouths of people that just want to see actual proof or hearing both sides before lynching this man is disgusting.
YOU THINK ALL WOMEN LIE ABOUT THIS
YOU JUST DONT BELIEVE HER BECAUSE YOURE SEXIST
Everyone deserves due process. Theres a reason its innocent until proven guilty.
To people that want to believe this at face value with zero proof that dont understand how bad the alternative is. Let me introduce you to something I think you might like. It's called a lynch mob.
Due process? What's that. Let's just all get mad and get rid of people because someone is crying. We dont need proof or evidence or an investigation. Surely no one would lie about something like this.
The vast, VAST majority of abusers go unpunished, while false accusations are extremely rare. Thus believing the victims of abuse is the only "fair" way to adjudicate abuse allegations, as it's much more likely that they're telling the truth about the abuse they experienced.
There is no way to "investigate" a crime that happened in private between two people that didn't result in a permanent physical injury. Each person's account is all you'll ever have to go on, and it's up to Blizzard (and everyone) to decide what to do given the information they have. There is absolutely nothing noble about defaulting to believing alleged abusers over alleged victims given the statistics in support of victims. Willfully ignoring that information is a truly disgusting choice to make.
I wonder what the statistics for domestic abuse are for cases that just decide to make a youtube video about it.
And there is nothing wrong with waiting til all the facts are out and we hear both sides. Believe it or not you can believe the victim, and still wait to verify their account. You said there would be no signs of trauma. There would be if he was holding her wrists the way she claims. I doubt with her being a streamer apparently(again I do not know either party) there would be zero proof of brusing on her wrists from these.
I am assuming they live in an apartment, in which case their neighbors would hear arguments if they were as loud as she was suggesting. You suggest I am making light of the situation I am not. I think they should have contacted the authorities, sought help with family or a womens shelter or stayed with friends. Not made a YouTube video about it.
Every. Single. Time. These come out to be fake it makes that statistic you say more prevalent. That is why they should be heavily investigated. And we shouldnt just believe the victim.
If I was being smothered with a pillow I think I would go to the police instead of making a youtube video. It might be because we have been bombarded with stories like these lately with slazzo and pyrocynical and others but man it sours these things whenever I see them. It could be 100% genuine. I dont know either of these people. But just the way she says things.
It could be slight self loathing why she doesnt just leave after he does all these asshole things. Where she feels she has no other place or wants to make the relationship work. But surely if she is seeing a psychiatrist about the relationship and that professional which you should trust since you're probably telling them bigger secrets than the dirty laundry(basically literally with the cunnilingus thing) you're airing right now. You would think youd trust their judgement and leave.
Idk why but I am especially hung up on the control freak bit where she calls him that and I might be reading too into it like I said but other than the parts where she is talking about what he does to her it sounds like she wants the power in the relationship and not to have it fair both ways between the both of them.
Once again I hope all this is true. That the police are involved in this obvious domestic dispute. But if it's not true. If this man is innocent. His life is RUINED. Read the title it's not "suspended, pending investigation" it's suspended. Period. Ther will be no second chance. And I believe in that if hes guilty. But there should be a proper investigation. I'm tired of this, person is guilty because someone cried BS.
I remember mattress girl. And so should everyone else. Assault is not something you judge someone with lightly.
Soul fire
Malchesars imp
Tiny knight
I dont think the universe is working against me as much as I believe that the power of positive thinking will make it work toward me. Things happen around me. Good or bad and I notice them.
Won some games with ETC broomstick and athletic studies. Until I faced a degenerate deck that was running snow fury giants. And after that I was done.
Obviously I should play around and draw RNG and my opponent discovering the perfect answer all the time. Obviously I'm just bad and not because it's a card game where most outcomes are based around luck and random generation that you or your opponent can do nothing about it but because "I should have played around it"
This was my free legendary. And just like someone else said i used it in a clunky deck that wasnt very good. But sometimes when I played him it was a decent swing. Still not gonna miss him when hes gone though, but I might keep the watch posts. For some reason my opponents think they do something.
Every time I face a priest that plays nothing but spells until turn five I always say: " if he plays the 2/6 in leaving"
Dont even bother playing the tavern brawl until lunacy is nerfed either.
Every time I play against a mage or a rogue they discover it and it's just as busted as in constructed.
People try to get good at this game? Where everything is random and little to no skill is involved? Lol
Dont tell this guy that those cards that he think warlock cant play are neutral cards than any class can play...
What stops people from just using it on users that they dont like as a profile downvote in passing.
If they cant implement a tournament mode, I wouldn't hold my breath for this.
Whenever control gets shafted in this game the community pulls out Ol' Reliable
"Just play aggro lol"
This is the best take in this comment section imo. There are things I disagree with, like you saying she does not mean to target his income or get him fired. Which she would obviously know something like this would achieve. This is a good thing if true, but heinous if not.
You also mention that he should have responded earlier, and would have no need for legal action or a "real reason" to remain silent. If you look at what happened to slazzo, where he also waited months to respond to his allegations which we know now are not true. He was setting up a lot of proof since apology videos made without sense and without facts that are ready to be layed out people ignore. I dont think silence equals guilt, I think guilt equals guilt. Theres a reason we have the fifth amendment AND due process in america.
Well I am on mobile so I will gladly use that as an excuse to why I didnt find better research. I will read the links provided later and maybe make a response, but with just skimming seeing that last one is about south Africa I already doubt the legitimacy overall of at least that article.
The reason I posted the link on it's own was because I was tired of seeing people quote crime statistics from a well know article about false allegations from 2002-10 the linkis biased I'll give that lol, but it does include finding from an FBI study in 2012, which I did read through and is not as hilarious as you claim. Your articles though are from 2020, so I will read them later.
But the point wasnt that the link proved it was a false claim it was that it was possible. There are people who comment here that seem to believe it is never possible for a "victim" to recant their story or falsely accuse someone for their own gain and even though it is a clearly biased article. It does well to show that I felt.
There are many cases of false accusations where the accused feel the deck is stacked against them. Like with the 2006 North Carolina lacrosse player false accusation, or the Columbia 2014 mattress girl case. I'm not saying this automatically makes the man innocent. I'm just saying it's possible. Just like its possible there may be rain on a cloudy day. Just because it was just overcast doesnt mean the possibility of there being rain was zero.
If you feel like I do where these cases need as much validity and structure to where no one doubts the outcome. Then you would be on my side and hoping for a formal investigation. And not just believing a victim because they say they are a victim. Our society is built on helping victims which I think is a good thing. But it also opens the door for bad actors. Which cannot and should not be ignored and doing so just because someone makes a youtube video where they are crying is just negligence.
https://johndavis.gonevis.com/how-many-rape-accusations-are-false/
The amount of people putting words into the mouths of people that just want to see actual proof or hearing both sides before lynching this man is disgusting.
YOU THINK ALL WOMEN LIE ABOUT THIS
YOU JUST DONT BELIEVE HER BECAUSE YOURE SEXIST
Everyone deserves due process. Theres a reason its innocent until proven guilty.
To people that want to believe this at face value with zero proof that dont understand how bad the alternative is. Let me introduce you to something I think you might like. It's called a lynch mob.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/27/us/emmett-till-lynching-carolyn-bryant-donham.html
Due process? What's that. Let's just all get mad and get rid of people because someone is crying. We dont need proof or evidence or an investigation. Surely no one would lie about something like this.
I wonder what the statistics for domestic abuse are for cases that just decide to make a youtube video about it.
And there is nothing wrong with waiting til all the facts are out and we hear both sides. Believe it or not you can believe the victim, and still wait to verify their account. You said there would be no signs of trauma. There would be if he was holding her wrists the way she claims. I doubt with her being a streamer apparently(again I do not know either party) there would be zero proof of brusing on her wrists from these.
I am assuming they live in an apartment, in which case their neighbors would hear arguments if they were as loud as she was suggesting. You suggest I am making light of the situation I am not. I think they should have contacted the authorities, sought help with family or a womens shelter or stayed with friends. Not made a YouTube video about it.
Every. Single. Time. These come out to be fake it makes that statistic you say more prevalent. That is why they should be heavily investigated. And we shouldnt just believe the victim.
Man why are there so many of these...
If I was being smothered with a pillow I think I would go to the police instead of making a youtube video. It might be because we have been bombarded with stories like these lately with slazzo and pyrocynical and others but man it sours these things whenever I see them. It could be 100% genuine. I dont know either of these people. But just the way she says things.
It could be slight self loathing why she doesnt just leave after he does all these asshole things. Where she feels she has no other place or wants to make the relationship work. But surely if she is seeing a psychiatrist about the relationship and that professional which you should trust since you're probably telling them bigger secrets than the dirty laundry(basically literally with the cunnilingus thing) you're airing right now. You would think youd trust their judgement and leave.
Idk why but I am especially hung up on the control freak bit where she calls him that and I might be reading too into it like I said but other than the parts where she is talking about what he does to her it sounds like she wants the power in the relationship and not to have it fair both ways between the both of them.
Once again I hope all this is true. That the police are involved in this obvious domestic dispute. But if it's not true. If this man is innocent. His life is RUINED. Read the title it's not "suspended, pending investigation" it's suspended. Period. Ther will be no second chance. And I believe in that if hes guilty. But there should be a proper investigation. I'm tired of this, person is guilty because someone cried BS.
I remember mattress girl. And so should everyone else. Assault is not something you judge someone with lightly.