NonaChild of the Night 940258 PostsJoined 05/29/2019
Posted 4 years, 11 months ago
And that's why my Quest Resurrect Priest runs Bad Luck Albatross. Even if my Opponent isn't playing Highlander, nothing better than imagining the Frustration of drawing many Albatross. ;)
NonaChild of the Night 940258 PostsJoined 05/29/2019
Posted 5 years ago
This was Fun as hell, but I took out the "Infinite" of Banker, just because I do want it to end eventually, So I'm going to see how many "Decoration" I can get up before I finally get 1 shot by Fatigue. I'll update with the final numbers.
Edit: 934 Decorations placed, 42 Revelers removed. I could have been better, but I ended a round with 7 Shutterwock on my field, and no way to remove one. It was starting to look like it would take a single 30 point Fatigue hit to end it, but RNGeebus decided to end it early.
NonaChild of the Night 940258 PostsJoined 05/29/2019
Posted 5 years ago
Problem with adding her to pure pally, is if she doesn't get drawn before some of the "pure pally" triggered cards. I've seen a few pure pally deck Ideas, and they are not that bad, but one thing is common throughout them all, not 1 single Neutral card in them.
NonaChild of the Night 940258 PostsJoined 05/29/2019
Posted 5 years ago
lol that was "just woke up, and pressed start" on the coffee pot. Thought I'd brighten up the day of everyone else, with my morning, uncaffeinated ramblings. :D
NonaChild of the Night 940258 PostsJoined 05/29/2019
Posted 5 years ago
well don't forget that Shammy 1 cost spell, freeze and enemy invoke Galarkond, just means they have to go face with it instead of you minions. So if Galakrond Shammy becomes as OP as some people believe it will be, this might see play, if only 1 copy.
NonaChild of the Night 940258 PostsJoined 05/29/2019
Posted 5 years ago
People think outside the box, I think this merely as one step closer to Mage Sidequest completion. Early on this could pose a serious threat if they have a sizable hand, hell even if they only have 4 cards in hand that's a 5/3 for 3 on turn 3 that they now have to deal with, plus could be that next turn elemental you had to play. So we'll see what people make of this once the Meta pans out.
NonaChild of the Night 940258 PostsJoined 05/29/2019
Posted 5 years ago
In the Year of the Dragon, with the Expac... Descent of Dragons.... that's what we're thinking of.... Mechs and Pirates. I assume this is some "tech cards" setting up Warrior for the next "year of the..." cycle.
NonaChild of the Night 940258 PostsJoined 05/29/2019
Posted 5 years ago
Wording... Murozond "Plays", Tess "Replays". in games like this Wording is all important, which is why game companies work their bum off trying to simplify and clarify. So different wording would imply a different effect.
And that's why my Quest Resurrect Priest runs Bad Luck Albatross. Even if my Opponent isn't playing Highlander, nothing better than imagining the Frustration of drawing many Albatross. ;)
Dragon Pack should have been the 1st thing nerfed when they nerfed Shammy at the end of last year.
Aye, we all hope you guys have a wonderful Christmas too!
eh, still had fun, but good to know.
This was Fun as hell, but I took out the "Infinite" of Banker, just because I do want it to end eventually, So I'm going to see how many "Decoration" I can get up before I finally get 1 shot by Fatigue. I'll update with the final numbers.
Edit: 934 Decorations placed, 42 Revelers removed. I could have been better, but I ended a round with 7 Shutterwock on my field, and no way to remove one. It was starting to look like it would take a single 30 point Fatigue hit to end it, but RNGeebus decided to end it early.
Problem with adding her to pure pally, is if she doesn't get drawn before some of the "pure pally" triggered cards. I've seen a few pure pally deck Ideas, and they are not that bad, but one thing is common throughout them all, not 1 single Neutral card in them.
This deck now gives a use to Wyrmrest Purifier.
Glad for the Updates and changes, but I've already got my Choice of Windrunner sisters, thank you.
lol that was "just woke up, and pressed start" on the coffee pot. Thought I'd brighten up the day of everyone else, with my morning, uncaffeinated ramblings. :D
well don't forget that Shammy 1 cost spell, freeze and enemy invoke Galarkond, just means they have to go face with it instead of you minions. So if Galakrond Shammy becomes as OP as some people believe it will be, this might see play, if only 1 copy.
People think outside the box, I think this merely as one step closer to Mage Sidequest completion. Early on this could pose a serious threat if they have a sizable hand, hell even if they only have 4 cards in hand that's a 5/3 for 3 on turn 3 that they now have to deal with, plus could be that next turn elemental you had to play. So we'll see what people make of this once the Meta pans out.
Concept is neat, but trying to synergize two completely different "clans" gonna make for one "muddy" deck.
When will the make Battlemages a thing in Wow for players... Come on now... stop teasing.
I can see this having a time to shine... just don't think it's now.
They are pushing real hard for Treant Druid to be a thing.
In the Year of the Dragon, with the Expac... Descent of Dragons.... that's what we're thinking of.... Mechs and Pirates. I assume this is some "tech cards" setting up Warrior for the next "year of the..." cycle.
OPAF
Sidequest synergy.
Eh, it's gonna probably summon a Acornbearer or some Battlecry minion you really wanted to cast.
Wording... Murozond "Plays", Tess "Replays". in games like this Wording is all important, which is why game companies work their bum off trying to simplify and clarify. So different wording would imply a different effect.