Semi-aggro Priest

Comments

• 1

• 

  MysteryMan 10 1 Posts Joined 05/26/2021
  Posted 3 years, 6 months ago

  when you see decks like this you really gotta wonder: Have people even tried this deck before submitting?

  and even if its total theorycrafting: what are you smoking?

  the amount of "wanna-be" synergies is staggering, vectus, alura, runthak and knife vendor(which i can somewhat forgive)

  Vectus: you have 3 deathrattles, and zero draw, the chances of actually getting the full value of vectus is really hard.

  Alura: what do you actually want out of youre deck? there are very few good spells, and even if you get those good spells its hardly worth it. (sometimes you even screw youreself over if you get rally! which is the best card in the deck)

  Runthak: this is the part where i dont believe you ever played this yourself, you will almost never have a minion in your han by turn 5, and even if you do, there is almost no synergy with runthak (other than crabrider).

  Please, and i beg you, actually try decks before submitting a steaming hot **** of a deck.

   

  -1
• 

  Fr0stByt3NL 85 1 Posts Joined 08/05/2020
  Posted 3 years, 4 months ago

  Jesus christ on a bicycle, you truly went off didn't you?
  
  It's a 'Theorycraft' deck for a reason (and in my theorycraft cases, in the pejorative sense of that word). It's not like I have a history of being HS's #1 theorycrafter to begin with so I'm not sure why you have such high expectations of random decks like these. Look at the submission date of this deck. It was theorycrafted before I was able to play the expansion, so of course I couldn't try out this deck before submitting. 
  
  I theorycraft these decks for myself, and upload them here so I can easily copy-paste them to the game. If others see these decks and enjoy my wacky ideas, then great! I hope they'll have fun too! If not, then they can continue looking for other decks more to their liking. 
  
  And besides, it's not like every deck submitted on this website has to be a meta-breaker for all to play. Sometimes, just sometimes, people like me want to have fun and try something wacky and far-reaching. I theorycraft decks to try out new cards (like Shadowed Spirit & Runthak) and/or certain archetypes (a sort of Aggro value Priest), not to have a 99.9% winrate against every meta deck in this game. And yeah, the synergies I theorized in this deck proved just that: A fun theory. That's why it's called a theorycraft after all. Sometimes this deck did wonders (like Alura casting a Rally! when my low-cost minions were dead, filling my board with Hero damaging minions, or a Vectus obtaining both my Shadowed Spirit's deathrattles, dealing even more damage to my opponent's Hero), but a majority of the time not so much because having the 'golden curve' this deck requires is of course not a given. When that happens, this deck is easily overrun or outvalued. But hey, I had my fun with this deck! That is what matters to me.
  
  When I see comments like this I really wonder: Have some people even tried to comprehend that other folks have different points of view? The definition one person has of 'fun' and 'theorycraft', hell even the very reason why people do something or play a certain game, will vary from the person next to them. And that's perfectly fine. Just don't be an arse/superior about it.
  
  So I ask you to calm your tits and let others have their version of fun with their steaming hot **** of a deck. Let me enjoy/suffer the consequences of my wacky theorycrafts in peace, while you do your thing. That way the both of us will be happy at the end of the day

  1

• 1