Legends of Runeterra
Actual balance suggestions, TF, Aphelios, Viktor, Nocturne, Fiora, Vlad, Jarvan, and more.
So here is a bigger list of changes I thought about targetting not only the meta but also the underplayed cards to make them better, have a read.
Twisted Fate:
Change his lvl up requirement to "I've seen you draw more than 1 card in 4 different rounds".
Add a perk where the first time TF slays an enemy unit each round, you draw 1 (removed on lvl 2).
The main problem with him is that he's too easy to level up for the value he provides afterward, but without a lvl up he's basically useless and easy to remove, changing his lvl up requirement so that it's no longer possible to lvl him up in a single round makes it so that the enemy actually has time to play around him. Adding a perk that forces TF into combat also makes him extra vulnerable to removal, but extra rewarding when done right. Now players get to choose whether they stick to having a lot of safe card draw, or use TF in combat to remove enemy units and draw cards on top. With this change, TF's quick attack will actually become useful, and since you essentially need to draw 1 extra card each turn after the round you play him for the lvl up requirement to count, it opens up synergies with regions with any sort of card draw, OR combat potential, so P&Z is not the only option for lvl ups anymore. The exact numbers are up to debate and need playtesting, but I think the idea of changing his lvl up requirement to "I've seen you X in different rounds" is the way to go in general.
Aphelios:
Increase the card cost from 3 to 4.
The phase progression no longer resets upon leveling up.
Not much more to say here, moon weapons themselves are pretty much balanced by being slow speed and the unit itself does not engage in combat before leveling up anyway. Increasing the cost prevents players from curving from him on turn 3, to TF on turn 4 as well, which is important. If there was anything else, I'd say make it so that moon weapons themselves no longer count towards phasing a new weapon, but if that was to go through then I'm not sure if the cost should be increased, either way, it needs playtesting.
Viktor:
Rework Hex core upgrade:
When cast, the player will get to choose 1 of 3 randomly selected keywords they can afford.
Different keywords will have varying cost, for example, Tough will cost 1, but Elusive will cost 4.
Card cost now depends on the keyword chosen.
Lvl up requirement changed to "I've seen you play 5 created cards".
At lvl 2 the created cards will cost 3 less instead of 1.
To put it simply, the hex core upgrade card will no longer have a set cost, instead, its cost will depend on the keyword chosen by the player so that applying elusive is more expensive than something like fury, for example, it will be a similar mechanic to invoking, where the randomness is still a thing, but the player has much more control, and thus can pick different ways to play depending on the situation and strategy. For the lvl up, I think he should have a more difficult requirement but a better reward, numbers are up to debate, but remember since Viktor will have to see you play created cards, removing him resets the progress.
Nocturne:
Change the lvl up requirement to "You've attacked with 5+ Fearsome allies." OR "You've struck the enemy Nexus with a Fearsome ally 3+ times" OR "You've dealt X damage with Fearsome allies" OR literary anything that does not require nightfall as a part of a lvl up requirement.
For as good as Nocturne is in theory, his lvl up requirement basically forces you to play with Targon to have access to enough nightfall units, and replacing that with Fearsome will actually let Nocturne be useful in more than like 1 or 2 decks. I think we all can agree that after leveling up, Nocturne works as a win condition, but it's just so unnecessarily hard to do so. Changing his requirement to SOMETHING that revolves around Fearsome units instead of nightfall will make him much better and still fit the theme.
Fiora:
The kill counter resets upon leveling up.
This will simply make it so that once she levels up, she will have to kill 4 more units instead of 2, bringing up the total number of kills to 6. Since she literary auto-wins the game the requirement MUST be hard, I still think that a rework is better to remove the auto-win completely, but I don't have the exact idea how so a simple nerf will work too.
Vladimir:
Allies can only be damaged by his ability once, every other time they will be "struck for 0 damage".
??? Add lifesteal at lvl 2 and Regeneration at lvl 1 maybe?
The first part simply means that once an ally was damaged by his ability, they won't be damaged again at any point even if they are affected by it again, this will perhaps let Vlad be useful in decks without Scargrounds as he won't be killing his allies as much. Note that even though allies won't take damage more than once, they will still get their "when I survive the damage" perk activated, as they are technically struck. Giving him lifesteal is questionable considering his stats especially that he already drains at lvl 2, but I'd like to see it playtested regardless.
Jarvan IV:
Give him Tough.
??? Reduce the lvl up requirement to 3 allies instead of 4 maybe?
So Jarvan in general is pretty underwhelming and incredibly difficult to level up, despite him having a barrier he is pretty fragile with just 3 health, considering all this armor a Tough keyword could work for him, as well as making him easier to level up but I'm not entirely sure if just reducing the number is a good idea, perhaps rewriting it completely could work, as now the fact that 0 power blockers don't count is pretty annoying.
Also rework LeBlanc maybe so that she actually feels like ya know, LeBlanc?
Other cards:
Soul Sheperd:
Instead of granting, she will give the bonus stats while on the board, so when removed or silenced, the buffs will be gone.
Just to add more counterplay to the aggro ephemeral strats which became more popular now with Azir, possibly reducing her health to 2 or changing the buff she provides to +2|+0 or +1|+0 could work too.
Iterative Improvement:
Change from Burst to Slow speed.
This will quite simply make it so that it's not as annoying when duping the burblefishes, people will no longer be able to summon a copied follower without passing over the initiative to the opponent.
Wiggly Burblefish:
Minimum cost set to 2.
A simple change that will stop the burblefishe's cost from dropping below 2, another way to limit elusive spam.
Hush and Starshaping:
Change their speed from Burst to Fast.
The most loved 2 Targonian cards both could use the same change, making them both fast really opens up for a lot of potential counters and removes a lot of frustration about the cards. For the hush itself, perhaps even increasing the cost to 4 could be justified.
Atrocity:
Can no longer target Champions.
Cost reduced to 5.
So Atrocity only works on followers but is cheaper, this will force players to be more creative than just beefing up Nasus and killing him to win the game, there is so much creative potential for him and other champions which is completely wasted because of this card, cuz why to bother being creative when you can 1 shot the nexus with a single spell. This change will also open up space for Riot to safely make champions with a lot of power without having to worry about this one spell. Also, remember They Who Endure? That archetype was basically replaced by Nasus, but with this change, both of them will have the potential to see play as Nasus is strong enough to be viable without Atrocity, and TWE will have a flat buff to the strat. In general, I think it's much healthier for the game for this spell to only be able to target followers.
Ravenous Flock:
Damage reduced from 4 to 3 OR increase a mana cost from 1 to 2.
As a 1 cost spell with a pretty big impact, it's pretty easy to enable in the right deck, I think it could use a damage nerf OR a cost increase instead, but it's not as important as the previous changes.
Aaaand that's it from my suggested changes, of course, it's not a whole balance patch, but it's a nice fruit for thought. Remember to treat things here more as an idea, aka "a direction towards which balancing could go but does not have to be exactly the way I described", I'm curious what yall think about my ideas and if they are any good, feedback appreciated! x)
Leave a Comment
You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign in here.
So here is a bigger list of changes I thought about targetting not only the meta but also the underplayed cards to make them better, have a read.
Twisted Fate:
Change his lvl up requirement to "I've seen you draw more than 1 card in 4 different rounds".
Add a perk where the first time TF slays an enemy unit each round, you draw 1 (removed on lvl 2).
The main problem with him is that he's too easy to level up for the value he provides afterward, but without a lvl up he's basically useless and easy to remove, changing his lvl up requirement so that it's no longer possible to lvl him up in a single round makes it so that the enemy actually has time to play around him. Adding a perk that forces TF into combat also makes him extra vulnerable to removal, but extra rewarding when done right. Now players get to choose whether they stick to having a lot of safe card draw, or use TF in combat to remove enemy units and draw cards on top. With this change, TF's quick attack will actually become useful, and since you essentially need to draw 1 extra card each turn after the round you play him for the lvl up requirement to count, it opens up synergies with regions with any sort of card draw, OR combat potential, so P&Z is not the only option for lvl ups anymore. The exact numbers are up to debate and need playtesting, but I think the idea of changing his lvl up requirement to "I've seen you X in different rounds" is the way to go in general.
Aphelios:
Increase the card cost from 3 to 4.
The phase progression no longer resets upon leveling up.
Not much more to say here, moon weapons themselves are pretty much balanced by being slow speed and the unit itself does not engage in combat before leveling up anyway. Increasing the cost prevents players from curving from him on turn 3, to TF on turn 4 as well, which is important. If there was anything else, I'd say make it so that moon weapons themselves no longer count towards phasing a new weapon, but if that was to go through then I'm not sure if the cost should be increased, either way, it needs playtesting.
Viktor:
Rework Hex core upgrade:
When cast, the player will get to choose 1 of 3 randomly selected keywords they can afford.
Different keywords will have varying cost, for example, Tough will cost 1, but Elusive will cost 4.
Card cost now depends on the keyword chosen.
Lvl up requirement changed to "I've seen you play 5 created cards".
At lvl 2 the created cards will cost 3 less instead of 1.
To put it simply, the hex core upgrade card will no longer have a set cost, instead, its cost will depend on the keyword chosen by the player so that applying elusive is more expensive than something like fury, for example, it will be a similar mechanic to invoking, where the randomness is still a thing, but the player has much more control, and thus can pick different ways to play depending on the situation and strategy. For the lvl up, I think he should have a more difficult requirement but a better reward, numbers are up to debate, but remember since Viktor will have to see you play created cards, removing him resets the progress.
Nocturne:
Change the lvl up requirement to "You've attacked with 5+ Fearsome allies." OR "You've struck the enemy Nexus with a Fearsome ally 3+ times" OR "You've dealt X damage with Fearsome allies" OR literary anything that does not require nightfall as a part of a lvl up requirement.
For as good as Nocturne is in theory, his lvl up requirement basically forces you to play with Targon to have access to enough nightfall units, and replacing that with Fearsome will actually let Nocturne be useful in more than like 1 or 2 decks. I think we all can agree that after leveling up, Nocturne works as a win condition, but it's just so unnecessarily hard to do so. Changing his requirement to SOMETHING that revolves around Fearsome units instead of nightfall will make him much better and still fit the theme.
Fiora:
The kill counter resets upon leveling up.
This will simply make it so that once she levels up, she will have to kill 4 more units instead of 2, bringing up the total number of kills to 6. Since she literary auto-wins the game the requirement MUST be hard, I still think that a rework is better to remove the auto-win completely, but I don't have the exact idea how so a simple nerf will work too.
Vladimir:
Allies can only be damaged by his ability once, every other time they will be "struck for 0 damage".
??? Add lifesteal at lvl 2 and Regeneration at lvl 1 maybe?
The first part simply means that once an ally was damaged by his ability, they won't be damaged again at any point even if they are affected by it again, this will perhaps let Vlad be useful in decks without Scargrounds as he won't be killing his allies as much. Note that even though allies won't take damage more than once, they will still get their "when I survive the damage" perk activated, as they are technically struck. Giving him lifesteal is questionable considering his stats especially that he already drains at lvl 2, but I'd like to see it playtested regardless.
Jarvan IV:
Give him Tough.
??? Reduce the lvl up requirement to 3 allies instead of 4 maybe?
So Jarvan in general is pretty underwhelming and incredibly difficult to level up, despite him having a barrier he is pretty fragile with just 3 health, considering all this armor a Tough keyword could work for him, as well as making him easier to level up but I'm not entirely sure if just reducing the number is a good idea, perhaps rewriting it completely could work, as now the fact that 0 power blockers don't count is pretty annoying.
Also rework LeBlanc maybe so that she actually feels like ya know, LeBlanc?
Other cards:
Soul Sheperd:
Instead of granting, she will give the bonus stats while on the board, so when removed or silenced, the buffs will be gone.
Just to add more counterplay to the aggro ephemeral strats which became more popular now with Azir, possibly reducing her health to 2 or changing the buff she provides to +2|+0 or +1|+0 could work too.
Iterative Improvement:
Change from Burst to Slow speed.
This will quite simply make it so that it's not as annoying when duping the burblefishes, people will no longer be able to summon a copied follower without passing over the initiative to the opponent.
Wiggly Burblefish:
Minimum cost set to 2.
A simple change that will stop the burblefishe's cost from dropping below 2, another way to limit elusive spam.
Hush and Starshaping:
Change their speed from Burst to Fast.
The most loved 2 Targonian cards both could use the same change, making them both fast really opens up for a lot of potential counters and removes a lot of frustration about the cards. For the hush itself, perhaps even increasing the cost to 4 could be justified.
Atrocity:
Can no longer target Champions.
Cost reduced to 5.
So Atrocity only works on followers but is cheaper, this will force players to be more creative than just beefing up Nasus and killing him to win the game, there is so much creative potential for him and other champions which is completely wasted because of this card, cuz why to bother being creative when you can 1 shot the nexus with a single spell. This change will also open up space for Riot to safely make champions with a lot of power without having to worry about this one spell. Also, remember They Who Endure? That archetype was basically replaced by Nasus, but with this change, both of them will have the potential to see play as Nasus is strong enough to be viable without Atrocity, and TWE will have a flat buff to the strat. In general, I think it's much healthier for the game for this spell to only be able to target followers.
Ravenous Flock:
Damage reduced from 4 to 3 OR increase a mana cost from 1 to 2.
As a 1 cost spell with a pretty big impact, it's pretty easy to enable in the right deck, I think it could use a damage nerf OR a cost increase instead, but it's not as important as the previous changes.
Aaaand that's it from my suggested changes, of course, it's not a whole balance patch, but it's a nice fruit for thought. Remember to treat things here more as an idea, aka "a direction towards which balancing could go but does not have to be exactly the way I described", I'm curious what yall think about my ideas and if they are any good, feedback appreciated! x)
Lot's of interesting suggestion here and I like the changes to Viktor Nocturne and ravenous flock.
Twisted Fate
That champion is not useless without level up since he has a versatile play effect and nerfing his level up condition alone won't be enough, drawing cards is vital component for any card game which mean we are always going to get more draw packages and our boy TF is always going to take advantage of that.
Aphelios
The fact that Aphelios don't need to attack before his level up is one his many advantages, it increase his survivability since it reduce the chance of him dying to combat tricks, and he is still useful because he keeps generating a bunch of versatile cards.
Vladimir
Why buff him? our fabulous not a vampire is in a good spot right now, and remember that Radiant Guardian was 5 attack with permanent life steal and that was too strong, so do we wan't to give a 6 attack life steal?
LeBlanc
The fact that Leblanc does not resemble her league counterpart is a sentiment that I have seen echoed in many places, but it's one that I don't agree with. in league Leblanc is squishy burst mage, in Runeterra she has high damage and low health so that's accurate, as for her deception gimmick, that way we have cards like Mimic and Black Rose Spy attack with Leblanc and then use spy to create another Leblanc like how her mirror image passive works in league.
Iterative Improvement
Why nerf this card? I don't see it being used in any top tier deck beside TF/Fizz, the synergy it has with Wiggly Burblefish is too powerful but that can be fixed by nerfing burblefish.
Atrocity
The problem with this card is not champions, it's Spell Shield , Atrocity into They Who Endure was a risky combo since a single Hush or Flash Freeze could interrupt it, but units like level 2 Nasus,The Destroyer and The Great Beyond all have spell shield, now you have to have at least two burst speed spells to counter it.
For TF, I think the problem is that his current lvl up requirement is very exploitable, like rummage into double stress testing, and the more the game develops the more card draws and potential exploits can pop up, that's why I suggested changing his requirement so it includes "in different rounds" so that it's impossible to lvl him up in a single turn, and considering his power afterwards 3 or 4 turns seem fair.
For Aphelios, people are complaining to nerf him, I personally don't think he needs it but if anything, a cost increase would be just the thing.
Is Vlad really useful in any deck that does not use Scargrounds? He's good in like one or two very specific scenarios, I thought allowing more room for deckbuilding around him should do the trick, and I agree that lifesteal could be a bit much, but I'm curious how it would work regardless.
Iterative Improvement change is just there as a potential TF Fizz nerf, but I'm just thinking it may end up being oppressive in another future deck that uses elusives, it's kinda a "just in case" suggestion.
As for Atrocity I just don't like how it's used on champions with a lot of power, there is so much more you could do with them, like after playing around with Nasus for a while I really found this card to be unnecessary to win, people expect Atrocity when they see me playing Nasus Kindred, but then I don't and win anyway. I just think it's a very lazy card, by that I mean it makes people lazy cuz it does not allow space for more creative strategies, just "has power=attrocity EZ GG" I am 90% sure I'm biased here though xD
TF:
I think that your change about his level up makes sense enough but I don't think you should give him another ability. The main reason is because Red card and Yellow card will become insane and it will actually make him even better than he is right now. It doesn't matter if he doesn't proc it more than once after that because all he will be is a 4 mana 2/2 that does X and draws a card, and that is currently half his issue. His play effect gave the user so much advantage and this will make it even worse. I do like the level up requirement change though.
Aphelios:
I think that nerfing him to 4 mana is such a huge nerf because it messes up his curve too greatly. I think his main issue is more towards cards like Veiled Temple and the protective spells Targon has. Making him 4 mana will overall make Aphelios worse but that means that there's a potential for Aphelios decks to just cut Aphelios for another card. Might be wrong on this because I haven't played too much Aphelios but I can say for sure that it will definitely void him from seeing play in the current meta.
Changing it so that his moon weapon phase resets is more of a change that I dislike not because it's just not consistent with other champions that reset their abilities when leveled up. e.g. Lucian, Sejuani, Kindred.
Viktor:
Good change? The only issue is as you pointed out some keywords are indefinitely better than the others and should cost more. The issue is that how can you determine what the cost is before being played? It's a bit too confusing so I would say that you shouldn't really change it too much.
Making his level up requirement weaker but his level up payoff stronger isn't a good idea imo.
I think that all Viktor needs is a stat buff out of anything to be playable. As of now he just doesn't trade well into anything when dropped on 4, though I suppose that's the point.
Nocturne:
Yeah, 100% agreed. Though at the same time I feel like you underestimate how often you will actually level him up by doing so. It will just make it so that Nocturne will be stronger without Nightfall package therefore making Targon's Nightfall cards to be worse.
Fiora:
Just say she needs 6 to kill btw.
Also while I think this is a decent change, the main issue is that her 4 kill effect is due to her flavor. Her LoL counterpart needs to hit 4 times and this is their translation into the game so I don't think they would want to change the number of kills needed to win. Would be nice to see them forego this notion though.
Vladimir:
A bit of a hot take but I think Vlad is in an okay position right now. He doesn't really need too much to make him good and operates more like a Deep deck where it's a worthy consideration but not a deck to ever go above tier 2. Changing it so he won't be able to hit his allies more than once is a nerf because you can just choose who to take the hit by repositioning their attack.
Also, Lifesteal is busted on him because it basically means that Vlad just heals to full when you play him. Consider that his skill damages his minions and drains the enemy Nexus as well.
Jarvan IV:
Why Tough? It makes him stronger definitely but not by that much imo. I think what they need to do is just change it so that attackers need to strike and not survive so cards with Quick Attack and attacking 0 attack minions counts towards his level up. Your suggestion isn't bad, it's just that it won't fully fix some of his flaws. (Not saying that mine will though.)
Soul Shepherd:
Uhh, why? Just out of curiosity. I don't see many Azir Hecarim decks. I get why you want to nerf it but seeing as how this deck isn't performing particularly amazingly I actually think that it's unnecessary. It's a pretty important card in matchups where the opponents have Ice Shard or Withering Wail. I think it's fine and nerfing it will just make Ephemerals outside of Azir decks even worse.
Iterative Improvement:
Yeah.
Wiggly Burblefish:
Yeah.
Starshaping:
Yeah.
Hush:
No.
Despite it looking like a nerf, it's actually a buff. It makes it weaker to reactive cards such as Bastion, Deny, Nopeify, but it makes it so much more incredibly stronger to cards that buff stats. You can no longer react to it when you have Sharpsight or Riposte which is not an uncommon answer at all.
Silence and Frostbite cards should NEVER EVER be Fast speed.
Atrocity:
I like Atrocity actually so this is more of a bias than anything else but keep it this way, please. I also don't think Atrocity is the issue in Nasus decks.
Ravenous Flock:
Hardly ever needs 4 damage to kill stuff and I actually like having a card that deals 4 damage in this game. I think making it 2 mana is better.
Overall, your suggestions aren't bad but some are definitely flawed.
Take my words with a grain of salt. I'm unranked and only play casuals lmao.
TF:
The new perk was just there to make his lvl up possible in all decks, if my suggestion was to go through without the perk, it would be outright impossible to lvl him up without extra card draw, which not every deck has. My main point about him is just making something that requires him to see you do something in different rounds so that no new loophole exploits come up in the future which would let people level him up in a single turn.
Aphelios:
I honestly think he does not need nerfs because he is actually difficult to play, but people are complaining about him and I thought this is one thing they could do, though perhaps moon weapons not counting towards phasing is a better option if anything.
Also I did not know other champs reset when leveling up, Fiora does not reset her kill progress when leveling up, so I thought it was not intended, another argument to make Fiora's kill count reset on a level up.
Viktor:
Quite simply you will always be able to choose a keyword you can afford, perhaps having some sort of "fixed RNG" could do the trick too, like you will always roll a random cost 1 keyword, a cost 2-3, and 4+ let's say, if you already have all keywords from a certain cost range you will just get more options for the ones ur missing.
Remember that he gains stats over-time, he is not supposed to be traded for anything.
For the lvl up requirement and payoff, well currently it takes quite a bit to level him up and the payoff is not great, so you either make it easier to get a current "meh" payoff or make the reward better, I just like the 2nd option.
For Vlad I think Imma edit it so it's more clear what I meant, simply when Vlad hits an ally with his skill for the first time he will deal 1 to them, and every other time he'll "do 0 damage" aka strike them for 0, meaning that "if I survive the damage" effects will be triggered without actually taking any damage.
It may or may not end up busted but currently, Vlad works in like 1 or 2 decks and with this change, he'll be at least considerable in other strategies without Scargrounds, which was my goal.
Soul Sheperd:
I think it would be more consistent with other followers, like the Targonian cards that "make it always day time" or "dragon allies cost 1 less", silencing those cancels the effect, and "granting" anything to ephemerals is weird anyway.
For Atrocity I just think it makes people lazy, or forces them to be lazy, instead of being creative and thinking of a good strategy that uses the nice design Nasus has they just slap this card and call it a day cuz it's the fastest. I just don't like how it's the best way to play decks with high-power characters, it's not only about Nasus but also Nautilus. Like there is all that creative stuff you could do with those champions but then this card says NAH, screw your strategizing if it has power just kill it and you win. Not a fan.
About Hush, so how would you nerf it? 4 cost perhaps?
For the Ravenous Flock that's the 2nd change I thought of, thing is with Noxus it seems too easy to enable when you have things like Death Lotus, either 3 damage or 2 mana cost will do the trick I think.
I would argue that it's not that hard to draw two cards in a single turn. Every region that TF wants to play it in has a way to play it, and also TF is in Bilgewater which also means he already has access to draw. Buffing TF's red and yellow card is just going to make him even more of a menace. He never needed his level up to be good and by doing this TF/Fizz will be the least of your problems. Not every champion needs to be self-sufficient and definitely not TF. You also definitely do not need to level them up to be the main focus of a deck. Sejuani hardly levels in Ashe Sejuani but she gets used often because of her stats and her ability to frostbite.
Thanks for clarifying, I understand a bit more how it works. It just works a bit more like Heimer which is alright. However, it's a bit hard to judge what keywords cost 1, 2, 3 or 4 and it's much worse than Heimer in that regard because of how much more keywords there are. It's just really confusing and hard to play, especially for beginners.
I don't think surviving 0 damage counts for surviving damage btw. Doing Thermo with 0 mana doesn't proc survive damage. I tested this out, so I don't think Vlad will work. If you were to say to make it so it does, then it will just make his interactions much more confusing. Otherwise, it's a really unnecessary buff to Vlad. More text, more confusion, no good.
I don't understand what you mean by it makes people "lazy". Every card game needs to be attractive and easy to understand for casual players, so you're bound to have simple cards with obvious build-arounds. Atrocity actually just fits in a place where I think it's one of the best-designed finishers because it has so many counterplays. Reducing the attack, killing the unit, recalling the unit, countering the spell, killing the opponent yourself, healing outside of range. You also say that it's bad because you just slot it in any big power decks and win the game but that's the point of the card, it's to build a deck around it, and just because it revolves around using big minions doesn't mean it's braindead. Hell, Atrocity is actually being run in other decks as well like Nightfall Aggro or Aphelios Kindred and they don't run 10+ power followers.
Then again, I'm just biased.
I want to say make it Focus speed, but that's probably just going to significantly nerf it.
Take my words with a grain of salt. I'm unranked and only play casuals lmao.
About Fiora, if anything, they could nerf her stats to 2/3. This makes her become more thoughtful about fighting certain units, because she won't kill 3-hp units as easily with any form of protection nor do challenged units have to worry as much being slain.
Twisted Fate has become the new blacksheep on everyone's tongue. I still somewhat stand by other cards like Wiggly Burblefish making TF look much more busted, but I could see TF have Quick Attack removed and made his level up stats 4/2 so that cards like Mystic Shot can kill him at all stages of the game., and he can't push damage as freely. I wouldn't mind shifting his 2 damage from Gold Card to Blue Card for thematic reasons, as in LoL, Blue Card does the most damage and restores mana, but not much else. So the Blue card could read "Deal 2 to an enemy. Refill 1 spell mana"; thus, Gold Card would just stun and do nothing else.
"Truth is in the shadows, waiting to be revealed by the light. But light only disperses the shadow." - Me
"If other people shared traits of those considered naive, the world would've become a better place." - Also me
What are they going to achieve by removing quick attack? Nobody in their right mind is gonna attack with TF, you just let him in the back row generating value. 2 HP at level 2 is not going to change anything either, so you target him with your mystic shot, assuming that your opponent don't have cards that can protect him like Suit Up! or Bastion, they are just going to play three spells and still get ton of value out of him.
There are other champions that don't really feel special alone, but their support cards make them feel more special. This is what they did with LeBlanc as well. Why do people have such a big problem with that?
Simply because vanilla Champions are A: usually not good enough B: not exiting to play and C: add not much to the game.
Lebland is maybe a decent card in reputation decks but is so boring that I will never bother playing her over a Riven.
It's the same reason why I am not interested in Shen at all although being a onetrick in LoL... He is just bland and his chracteristics got very poorly executed exept for Stand United which is not strong enough for the current LoR powerlevel.
Btw I wish there were more swap effects and a Shen rework featuring more the stragic teamfight nature of Shen in LoL