Playing non comital decks that say simple cycle with every card but don't present valid wincons are bad
Not only because they can be countered by a single card, but because playing them actually degrades your ability to be a good player
I see this mistake a lot with taylor swift, why not just play prank cards with her and fill up the board with cycle garbage?
Well because your deck isn't doing anything, it is in fact exceptional in it's ability to do nothing.
It presents zero wincons, it has zero answers, it has zero alternate approaches to play, it is in fact a gaping hole an absence of play.
The same thing can be said about playing an elusive good stuff deck.
Its like yep here we go how many avalanche effects do you have in hand?
Are we going to take advantage of the fact that you may be bricked or that lodestone exists so it doesn't really matter if you get board cleared
Yes that is one approach, but what happens when youre forced to actually play the game
Play in a meta where decks that actually do something are good?
Well you might very well be garbage?
We saw this in the post Ionia patch, people who were just like well shiiiit wtf do I do now that I can bounce everything?
Idk engage with the games mechanics, think, exercise pass priority, not suck?
Long story short try to brew decks that actually accomplish a set objective, it will make you a better player.
Leave a Comment