You scared me with your mention of the season ending this Friday. But I just double-checked. Unless I’m misunderstanding something, this extra-long season stretches until March 3rd. This Friday is the cut-off for Seasonal Tournament qualification, so that’s probably what you’re referring to
Yes. Sorry. All my LoR-circle is entirely preoccupied with the seasonal tournament qualification so that's where my head was; sorry. There is still until the morning of March 3rd to earn the icon and the additional prismatic rewards.
You scared me with your mention of the season ending this Friday. But I just double-checked. Unless I’m misunderstanding something, this extra-long season stretches until March 3rd. This Friday is the cut-off for Seasonal Tournament qualification, so that’s probably what you’re referring to
There are so many cards that could use a buff, here are some that I would like to see personally :
Do this one even need an explanation? We have Iterative Improvement it has the same cost but with better speed the ability to target any follower on the field and a bonus +1/+1.
This has the potential to be a good control/removal option for noxus but those stats are just way too low for it's cost.
3 mana just to grant a unit challenger is a bad deal, it should also give a stat boost.
I do think that this could go back to 3 health, I mean we do have Sparklefly which have similar stats while being much cheaper. Or maybe don't and just nerf Sparkfly.
Shaman is the frontrunner, with warlock and warrior being the only classes that can counter it, the deck I'm posting just copies crabs and wins that way.
There are a ton of cards I like in this game that have slowly become unplayable
Everyone list a few and see if we can't get them buffed
Rimetusk Shaman a 3/3 for five mana that does nothing when you play it imagine playing this into a calibrum or get excited. This stat line made more sense when grasp was the only good answer, but those days are long gone make it a 3/4 it will never be op at least it will demand 2 cards to answer
Roughly a million times worse than his 2 mana brother, pinging is not this valuable make him a 3/2 for 3
the bunny needs to be a 0/1 for this card to work
For goodness sakes we have 3/4 boxtupuses being summoned for 2 mana with challenger
We have a 2/3 elusive for 2 in Targon, this needs to be a 3/2 elusive for 3
just make it a 2/1 lets pretend yeti decks can be a thing
So bad I can't even find his updated stats. He's a 1/3 for 4, I could see this being 3 mana as a 1/2
He's a rare by the way new players will be like awesome...then awww
Just make it a 3/3 that summons a 3/3 on play we have the golden sisters in targon
This is just 2 regions by the way where we see the core set needing a little love.
You also inspired me to craft Murgurgle and try to build my own Murloc-Dragon deck, with Skyfin and Scalelord. A bit heavier Murloc focus. Some good results and much fun, thanks!
Now for something more subtle and only noticable by yourself... What about playing a topdecked card (which flips the board state in your favor) instead of playing the exact same copy of that topdecked card which you already had several turns earlier in your hand. Would this also be considered as BM or does it just proof that you are being an ass**le? 😅
There is actually a good reason to do that: it makes your opponent more likely to think you didn't already have the card in your hand, and are therefore unlikely to play around the second copy in the following turn(s). However, if you play the version that's been sat in your hand for a while, the opponent knows you were holding onto it, so the second copy could easily be one of the other cards you've been holding onto. I'm sure game theory could weigh in here, but it's an area of maths that I never studied formally so I'll leave it to someone else to say exactly how (if at all).
That doesn't stop it being BM if the decision to play the top-decked card was based (partly) on annoying the opponent. The key part here is the intent, rather than the action itself. In other words I consider any action intended to tilt, anger, or otherwise annoy the opponent to be BM, but the same action made without any such intent is fine. Naturally it can be pretty difficult to tell them apart, but at least BM-ers are often kind enough to keep BM-ing to help make it obvious.
I totally agree with your assessment, intent is the key here. Often times though, it is hard to keep good and bad intent apart, because a game winning play should at least feel good to 1 of the 2 players and the reverse could be true for the other player. But did the feel good experience come purely from winning the game or also from how extremely well you managed to destroy your opponent? (by making the most optimal plays)
Furthermore, I think in a digital card game, intent is sometimes hard to get across the screen. You might have the best intent in the world, but if the opponent does not interpret it in the same way then the experience is different. Thus, whether or not some behavior is considered BM is always in the eye of the beholder probably.
The hand dump with lethal already on the board. The Play Every Card In Hand instead of simply using that Fireball for lethal.
I don't do those (unless my opponent has been a turd all game) or the other mentioned, but I will do the Top Decked copy of a card as a rage trigger. Guilty. :D
Now for something more subtle and only noticable by yourself... What about playing a topdecked card (which flips the board state in your favor) instead of playing the exact same copy of that topdecked card which you already had several turns earlier in your hand. Would this also be considered as BM or does it just proof that you are being an ass**le? 😅
There is actually a good reason to do that: it makes your opponent more likely to think you didn't already have the card in your hand, and are therefore unlikely to play around the second copy in the following turn(s). However, if you play the version that's been sat in your hand for a while, the opponent knows you were holding onto it, so the second copy could easily be one of the other cards you've been holding onto. I'm sure game theory could weigh in here, but it's an area of maths that I never studied formally so I'll leave it to someone else to say exactly how (if at all).
That doesn't stop it being BM if the decision to play the top-decked card was based (partly) on annoying the opponent. The key part here is the intent, rather than the action itself. In other words I consider any action intended to tilt, anger, or otherwise annoy the opponent to be BM, but the same action made without any such intent is fine. Naturally it can be pretty difficult to tell them apart, but at least BM-ers are often kind enough to keep BM-ing to help make it obvious.
Yeah as I copied it together with links you can guess that it was just copy-paste from Urban dictionary. But my point is, that we might get some kind of quest or something.
Lulu Zed Emoosives Deck List + Guide - Runeterra Deck Spotlight
Yes. Sorry. All my LoR-circle is entirely preoccupied with the seasonal tournament qualification so that's where my head was; sorry. There is still until the morning of March 3rd to earn the icon and the additional prismatic rewards.
The Great Amalgamation!
lol took my 2nd turn for my opponent to concede. I didn't have the Untamed Beastmaster x2, so replaced with Totemic Reflection x2.
Lulu Zed Emoosives Deck List + Guide - Runeterra Deck Spotlight
Ok I am gonna try this deck just for that pun :D
In all seriousness I like Lulu and I wish we had better support cards. She is a fun champion to play.
Lulu Zed Emoosives Deck List + Guide - Runeterra Deck Spotlight
You scared me with your mention of the season ending this Friday. But I just double-checked. Unless I’m misunderstanding something, this extra-long season stretches until March 3rd. This Friday is the cut-off for Seasonal Tournament qualification, so that’s probably what you’re referring to
The Great Amalgamation!
Step 1. Draw 1 drop. Step 2. Use every hard counter card until exhaustion.
Losers the one who ran out of counters
cards that desperately need a buff
There are so many cards that could use a buff, here are some that I would like to see personally :
Do this one even need an explanation? We have Iterative Improvement it has the same cost but with better speed the ability to target any follower on the field and a bonus +1/+1.
This has the potential to be a good control/removal option for noxus but those stats are just way too low for it's cost.
3 mana just to grant a unit challenger is a bad deal, it should also give a stat boost.
I do think that this could go back to 3 health, I mean we do have Sparklefly which have similar stats while being much cheaper. Or maybe don't and just nerf Sparkfly.
The Great Amalgamation!
I like to play Toxfin on my canons because I am an evil person.
The Great Amalgamation!
I just pirate warrior'ed through my opponents. Just too easy when everything can trigger your Ship's Cannon and Skybarge
The Great Amalgamation!
Shaman is the frontrunner, with warlock and warrior being the only classes that can counter it, the deck I'm posting just copies crabs and wins that way.
Tavern Brawl · Menagerie Warrior · by Jdeg9142 · 5 years, 7 months ago
Aggro-vating Demon Hunter Deck List and Guide - Memes and Dreams #8
Reached Diamond 5? Check.
Need to grind DH wins and DH XP (still only level 46!)? Check, check.
Enjoy disruptive or off-meta play styles? Check, check.
Seems like a winner to me! Thanks for posting these great decks in this series.
cards that desperately need a buff
There are a ton of cards I like in this game that have slowly become unplayable
Everyone list a few and see if we can't get them buffed
Rimetusk Shaman a 3/3 for five mana that does nothing when you play it imagine playing this into a calibrum or get excited. This stat line made more sense when grasp was the only good answer, but those days are long gone make it a 3/4 it will never be op at least it will demand 2 cards to answer
Roughly a million times worse than his 2 mana brother, pinging is not this valuable make him a 3/2 for 3
the bunny needs to be a 0/1 for this card to work
For goodness sakes we have 3/4 boxtupuses being summoned for 2 mana with challenger
We have a 2/3 elusive for 2 in Targon, this needs to be a 3/2 elusive for 3
just make it a 2/1 lets pretend yeti decks can be a thing
So bad I can't even find his updated stats. He's a 1/3 for 4, I could see this being 3 mana as a 1/2
He's a rare by the way new players will be like awesome...then awww
Just make it a 3/3 that summons a 3/3 on play we have the golden sisters in targon
This is just 2 regions by the way where we see the core set needing a little love.
Post your ideas down below.
Aggro-vating Demon Hunter Deck List and Guide - Memes and Dreams #8
BloodMefist.
Hey man, love your content. Your Meme's and Dreams series is my favourite original content in outof.cards.
The Great Amalgamation!
This is a great deck for this Brawl
Dragon Paladin Budget Deck List & Guide - Hearthstone Budget Deck Breakdown
You also inspired me to craft Murgurgle and try to build my own Murloc-Dragon deck, with Skyfin and Scalelord. A bit heavier Murloc focus. Some good results and much fun, thanks!
Aggro-vating Demon Hunter Deck List and Guide - Memes and Dreams #8
I LIKE IT!
[Game] Card Treasure Hunt (The Resurrection Attempt)
Yup, it's Festeroot!
What do you consider BM within HS?
That would be a shitty game!
Tier List Updates
So mobalyitics has updated it's tier list, and I have to say I'm impressed this go around.
https://lor.mobalytics.gg/meta-tier-list
There are some boss inclusions in here, like sparklefly combo
Lucian ephemerals
Swain TF rightly featured again
Just an overall effort to expand B tier into something great for us diversity enthusiasts like me
c Tier is still absent but that's probably for the best
Legends is actually a very balanced game in terms of play rates and win rates
Like if you still want to pilot Soraka, I bet you could hit a 54 percent winrate and rank up just fine.
It's all down to the player, and that's what makes this game so great.
What do you consider BM within HS?
I totally agree with your assessment, intent is the key here. Often times though, it is hard to keep good and bad intent apart, because a game winning play should at least feel good to 1 of the 2 players and the reverse could be true for the other player. But did the feel good experience come purely from winning the game or also from how extremely well you managed to destroy your opponent? (by making the most optimal plays)
Furthermore, I think in a digital card game, intent is sometimes hard to get across the screen. You might have the best intent in the world, but if the opponent does not interpret it in the same way then the experience is different. Thus, whether or not some behavior is considered BM is always in the eye of the beholder probably.
What do you consider BM within HS?
The hand dump with lethal already on the board. The Play Every Card In Hand instead of simply using that Fireball for lethal.
I don't do those (unless my opponent has been a turd all game) or the other mentioned, but I will do the Top Decked copy of a card as a rage trigger. Guilty. :D
What do you consider BM within HS?
Honestly, I would consider this to be the best way to spend some time on the toilet ^_^
What do you consider BM within HS?
There is actually a good reason to do that: it makes your opponent more likely to think you didn't already have the card in your hand, and are therefore unlikely to play around the second copy in the following turn(s). However, if you play the version that's been sat in your hand for a while, the opponent knows you were holding onto it, so the second copy could easily be one of the other cards you've been holding onto. I'm sure game theory could weigh in here, but it's an area of maths that I never studied formally so I'll leave it to someone else to say exactly how (if at all).
That doesn't stop it being BM if the decision to play the top-decked card was based (partly) on annoying the opponent. The key part here is the intent, rather than the action itself. In other words I consider any action intended to tilt, anger, or otherwise annoy the opponent to be BM, but the same action made without any such intent is fine. Naturally it can be pretty difficult to tell them apart, but at least BM-ers are often kind enough to keep BM-ing to help make it obvious.
Razorfen? Quilboars? The Horde? Hearthstone BlizzConline Expansion Teasers
Yeah as I copied it together with links you can guess that it was just copy-paste from Urban dictionary. But my point is, that we might get some kind of quest or something.
Razorfen? Quilboars? The Horde? Hearthstone BlizzConline Expansion Teasers
LF Heals for RFK. Are you available Myke?
What do you consider BM within HS?
If you play a match while sitting on the toilet, then I would consider that a BM.