All Comments

Nirast, The Harvester is pretty cool. Both in terms of flavor and balance. My only concern is that druids don't have any weapons other the Twig of the World Tree, and that was an exception to the usual rule, so giving druids an attack based weapon feels a little odd. Shard of Light is honestly a really cool design. I think it is a very clever way of making use of the one durability restriction. Worgen Claw is alright, but a little bland, and pretty under-powered. Spending 3 mana to deal 4 damage is balanced, but a 1/4 weapon for 3 mana? When was the last time you saw someone play Light's Justice? Dragoncaller is definitely my favorite, but I think it could use some tweaking. First off I would increase the cost to 5 or 6 mana. I would also change the "if the attack damaged your hero" bit since that is kind of a weird restriction. Instead I would have it trigger if you killed a minion. I don't like Staff of Origination for two reasons. One, it has 5 lines of text (I know Killmox, the Banished One exists, but that is the exception, and it also isn't a collectible card). Second, transforming all of your cards into random legendaries for 5 mana is just really bad. I am not a very big fan of Savage Claw. 99% of the time it might as well have no text at all. It can bypass taunts, but in plenty of cases you would rather kill the taunt then spend your turn not attacking and deal 4 damage to them. Thunderfury is interesting, but by 7 mana you could easily just play the big minion you are about to cheat instead of spending 9 mana cheating it out. Vol'jin's Mojo is one of your better designs. I think you did a good job making a balanced weapon that utilizes the 1 durability well. All in all I would go with eithe Vol'jin's Mojo or Dragoncaller.

Wailor, I don't like it. Oozes are barely played since most of the time your opponent won't have a weapon for you to destroy, and at their base they are just bad vanilla minions. I don't see why copying your opponents weapon is any better. Soul eater is a very cool design, but it is seriously OP, especially in a class like Demon Hunter that can already whip out a ton of damage. Getting an extra 5 damage for each soul fragment makes every attack of this weapon equivalent to playing a [Hearthstone Card (Soul Shard Lapidary) Not Found] I would change it a 4 mana 3/1 or maybe a 2/1 weapon. I also think you could adjust the text to make it read better, but I am not exactly sure how.

Pokeniner, Maybe this is just because I am biased against Demon Hunters, but I don't like the idea of them being able to get a two damage ping over and over again with no real way for you to stop it. They can't attack face with it, which is a plus, but [Hearthstone Card (penflinger) Not Found] is bad enough, we don't need another small board control tool to help demon hunters stay ahead.

Hordaki, As you mentioned, it is very similar to Stormhammer, which some people may not like. But for the most part I think it is a very cool card. I really like the idea of overload shaman, and I would love to have a flexible weapon like this to help the deck out.

BloodMefist, I don't like Xal'Atoh. 7 mana for 7 damage is a very bad deal, and adding another 7 mana card to your hand barely makes it better. Most of the time you would prefer to just play Gorehowl instead of playing Xal'Atoh and then spending another 7 mana next turn. And corrupting a 7 mana card is a real pain, and the payoff is terrible since Xal'Atoh is a very underpowered card to start with. That being said, I do really like Infusion Hammer. It is good in terms of balanced and flavor, and I am always happy to see an under represented archetype get a cool card.

Demonxz95, In theory, I think this is a very cool way to make use of the "worgen" mechanic, but in practice I don't think it really works. On one side it is a slightly better version of Eviscerate, and on the other side it is a worse version of Light's Justice. One side is clearly better than the other, and neither side is particularly intersting.

DavnanKillder, Banishing Blade is neat, but I don't think it really fits this competition. It feels like it should be a spell, but is only a weapon because it has to be. I really like Vengeful Axe, but I think you should either reduce the durabilty buff to +1, or increase the cost to 3 wince getting a 3/3 weapon on turn 2 is a bit much. I am not a fan of Midnight's Scythe since warlocks only have one weapon (and Skull of the Man'ari was a special exception) so I don't think Warlocks should get an attack-based weapon out of the blue. The Forbidden Scroll is very, very OP. Any warlock would be fine spending 9 life on a voidlord, which gives them 18 life worth of taunts, or 8 life for an Enhanced Dreadlord, which gives them 7 life in taunts and minimum 5 life from the deathrattle.

fungusABoa, The Card of Legend, while a fun design in concept, is a terrible card in play. In almost no situation is a random legendary going to be better than the cards you placed in the deck yourself. And how does Orb of Eternity work? As it is written, you would take any amount of damage and be reduced to 1 life. So playing this card would have no effect other than killing you after two hits. Did you intend for it to say "whenever your hero takes damage" instead of "after your hero takes damage"? Because if so the result would be infinite life. If it says "after" then the damage would have to resolve before the effect can take place. So if you are at 1 health and take 2 damage, you would go to negative 1 life, die, then the effect of the weapon would resolve. But it is too late since you are dead.

Linkblade91, I like the design, but I am not sure how priest is supposed to use this aside from using Spawn of Shadows, Shadowbomber, or handful of other terrible niche neutral cards. Also, giving an attack-based weapon to two classes that don't use weapons may not go over well with some voters.

grumpymonk, Poison-Tip Dagger is not a bad design, but it is my least favorite of the three. I really like Detachable Blade since it makes good use of the Echo keyword, and also justifies the 1-durability, and is also very balanced. Talonclaw is another very creative design, but I think it is a bit OP at 2 mana. I would make it a 3 or 4 mana weapon, or maybe do what Paladins do and have it buff a guy in your hand. Also the deathrattle should say "Equip Talonclaw" not "Reequip this".

DestroyerR, Pocket Knife feels a bit strange. I think the trade-off of spending mana or getting initiative on the attack makes for some interesting game play, and it is also a handy combo activator. I do not like Xal'Atath though. Having your spells cost health instead of mana can make for some terrible combo plays. Priests will have no hard time finding a way to sling out 15 spells on turn 3 and still have most of their life remaining. And worse, you can get that benefit for the entire game. You don't get to pick the target of the spells, which balances it a little bit, but it isn't enough to negate the tremendous benefits of getting free spells. Also, the text alone doesn't really make it clear exactly what the card does, which is fine for some cards, but your card will get more stars if it doesn't require expaining.

anchorm4n, Balanced Blade it just a wordier version of Gorehowl. It works exactly the same way. The only difference is that you can attack face with it, allowing you to half your opponents life with this one card alone. Staff of Souls is pretty cool, but I think you should increase the cost to 4 mana. 3 seems like too little considering how many cards this can generate over the course of the game. I don't really like Blade of Souls. Partly because Soul Demon Hunter is already OP enough and they don't need another source of burst damage. But also partly because it feels too much like a spell masquerading as a weapon just to fit the theme.