Example for the current state of things:
Select "Hunter decks" -> try to select an archetype via filter -> you get offered archetypes from all classes (probably just all the archetypes there currently are avaible).

Request:
Would it be possible to narrow down the filter for archetypes to the class I chose? I actively selected "Hunter decks", so it feels awkward to scroll through a list of archetypes from all classes until I find for example Malygos Hunter waaaaay down the list. There are 153 archetypes as of now, 12 of them Hunter. A selection of 12 would be a lot easier to choose from than 153.

Aside from that: great job, thanks a lot for your dedication and work! I deleted hearthpwn from my bookmarks this morning ;-)

They just announced a MTG TV Series for Netflix!

https://www.polygon.com/2019/6/3/18648018/magic-the-gathering-netflix-series-joe-anthony-russo

even tough im more a fan of Hearthstone right now i played MTG for almost 15 years and read lot´s of books about the Storys etc.

I excited to see some of the MTG Lore on TV - i would have prefered it more as an Real Life Adaption but i guess some sort of Anime/Animation is fine too - as long as they make it good :) :)

So far i'm excited! What do you think ?

I used to farm Murloc Shaman with Midrange Hunter but this new list of Murloc Shaman that has late game cards is hard to beat.

Yayyy!! :D. HearthPwn just got an announcement that it's staying online!!! WOOHOOO

"We’re excited to welcome HearthPwn to the Magic Find family and we’re very happy to announce that the site will keep its doors open! We’re a small independent team of people who worked on gaming websites in the past and are teaming up to build up new communities together.

Over the next few months we will do our best to ramp up improvements to the website and work together with all of you to improve performance and work on developing new ideas.

Acquisitions are always a bit strange and come with a lot of questions, we’ll do our best to answer them and we hope we’ll build trust over time and improve HearthPwn together."

https://www.hearthpwn.com/news/6747-an-update-on-the-future-of-hearthpwn

e.g. 28/30 cards, even though it is a full 30 cards deck?

if you go to collection and click on the deck, the marker would disappear and you could use the deck normally...

Hello there, I'm a casual player like many others, so I just wanna know if it is possible to add the "contains" text box in the search engine of decks that allows to type there some cards which are in the collection of people who doesn't have all cards yet.

Thank you.

A thought occurred to me while looking at Pyros. There are adventure/expansion guides for all Hearthstone content. For sake of convenience, when we click onto expansion/adventure logo, it should redirect to respective guide. In this case, Pyros should redirect to Ungoro guide if clicked on. What do you think of the idea?

Do we really need two links that go to the exact same page in the top nav bar? Perhaps the Hey, yournamehere! should stay like it is, and Profile should be removed or replaced with something else. I'm not sure what's currently implemented that would be a good fit though.

I've noticed many of the card images here don't have the watermark that identifies which set the card belongs to. Somebody may reference a card, and I'll likely have no idea which set it is from without looking it up. How difficult or time consuming would it be to remake the images with the watermarks?

So earlier this week, I made it to Legend for the first time, and today, I got to play (and beat) Brian Kibler! I am almost embarrassed to admit that I was essentially starstruck. For starters, I am an old school MtG player, so Kibler is basically a living legend in my opinion. It was also the first time I have ever played against (that I know of) one of the Hearthstone pro's. 

And, for what it's worth, I did resist the urge to snipe him. I only looked at Twitch after I knew the game was done, just to see if it was actually Kibler. 

I went to check out what Hot Wild Decks were featured on the front page today to find over half of them were just Tavern Brawl decks despite already being featured in the Tavern Brawl specific deck feature section.

If a deck is made specifically for a Tavern Brawl it shouldn't show up in the Hot Decks section for either format.

As Out of Cards isn't an hearthstone only site as some competitors of old, I think that we should change a little how we handle discussion about things that aren't hearthstone related.

How things are now: we have a big section called "Hearthstone" that contains a lot of different things about our favourite game, a smaller section called "Magic the Gathering" with things related to different media (Magic Arena and paper magic, but more Arena of course), a "Fan Creation" section that seems to be Hearthstone related, and an "Off Topic" with a "video game" subsection.

What I propose: while it's clear that Hearthstone is the most important reason people come here, we must say that there can be more. So I propose to change the section Magic related to one called something like "Other Collective Card Game", with a Magic subsection and an other sub section. Maybe now it would be nearly empty, but in future, who knows? Yugioh, Eternal, Elder Scroll Legends, Artifacts, the secret thing I'm working on, there are a lot of CCG on the market people can discuss on.
For the same reason, in the "Fan Creation" section we should have a section for creations that aren't Hearthstone related. I loved how on hearthpwn there were the card creation contest, I know that it's a feature that will be implemented, but there is no reason to stop around Hearthstone. Why not support people who make fan card of Magic? Or Yugioh? Or who want to share arts or code or projects for new ccg?
Both are things that shouldn't go in a "video game" under "off topic" section, that is for things that aren't ccg.

I saw that there are now at least 2/3 thread dedicated to other ccg, so sooner or later it can be something implemented.

Anyone here play Duel Links? Folk are always talking about Shadowverse or Eternal or Magic Arena or whatever in their Hearthstone downtime but I rarely see mention of good old Yu-Gi-Oh! I go through phases but I prefer it to all of the above and currently I'm playing it more than HS. I don't have any great insight to add, I'm just curious.

I predict that the Hearthstone Team will support Thief Priest as a new archetype in the next expansion. For one, they have already printed multiple Legendaries for this archetype, including Talanji and Madame Lazul. Plus, one of the Boomsday cards that they decided to buff was Cloning Device, which could only ever see play if Thief Priest got more synergy cards like Talanji. This next piece of evidence is a little shaky, but in the solo adventures one of the buckets is "What's Mind is Mine", which indicates that Blizzard already thinks of Thief priest as its own archetype. However, Thief priest cards have printed before (such as Archbishop Benedictus) without them following up with synergy cards, so this could just be empty speculation. What do y'all think? Will Thief Priest finally become a deck next expansion?

I've played around 70+ arena runs so far, and I didn't use heartharena because I was learning out the game-mode. However, in each game, there's some sort of a skill-cap on what you can learn by yourself, and what you can learn by using guides etc...

So should I use HearthArena or not? It does feel a little counter-intuitive as it would make me a worse player, too dependant on the thing.

Greetings Everyone.

i like this site very much and i like hearthpwn too, because of the great staff, so i want to help them as much as possible, considering my self as a loyal member of this website, i want to share my ideas instead of keeping it for my self. 

- Changing the color. 

 Black is a color that brings despair and sadness, it is good and beautiful in term of desgin, but it doesn't have good feelings coming from it. 

  x SUGGESTIONS: 

 - Yellowish color, it's the game's main color. 

 - The color of  the latest expansion, but that would be exhausting for the staff i think. 

- Cards entrace voiceline and intro music.

This was one of the best features Hearthpwn had, but we know they stopped doing this feature, please bring it back here. 

- Card's Winrate through its history. 

 This is a hard one, and i hope they do it but it's really hard.

That's everything for now, and sorry if i made a suggestion the staff are not intending to make, or already made. 

What are your favorable/unfavorable matchups?

Finally made it to outofcards, starting right of with a fun deck I am playing. I recently purchased that package where you get the Thunder God as Hero skin and immediately thought of reviving an old deck I used to play where you try to get as many Thaddius and The Storm Guardian as you can (just for flavor).

Thunder God Deck

Wild · Big Shaman · by LittleOgre · 7 years ago

• 1 Earth Shock x 2
• 1 Reincarnate x 2
• 2 Ancestral Spirit x 2
• 2 Devolve x 2
• 2 Spirit Echo x 2
• 3 Far Sight x 2
• 3 Healing Rain x 2
• 3 Lightning Storm x 2
• 4 Archmage Vargoth x 1
• 4 Baron Rivendare x 1
• 5 Feugen x 1
• 5 Hagatha's Scheme x 2
• 5 Muckmorpher x 2
• 5 Stalagg x 1
• 5 Volcano x 2
• 5 White Eyes x 1
• 6 Eureka! x 1
• 6 Sylvanas Windrunner x 1
• 8 Da Undatakah x 1

14,940 Dust 937 0 Copy Deck Code

Can someone explain me why there are interactive and non-interactive decks? I keep hearing those terms and don't know what they mean.

I need help!!!  I have been trying to do the Warlock/Snip Snap deck and I always time out on my turn before lethal is on my minion. I've had it done to me, so I KNOW it's possible to do it.  Is there a trick I'm missing that allows you to by pass waiting for Snip Snap to spawn in your hand to get the echo?

What if Blizzard were to buff the classic set cards the same way they buffed boomsday? I think such thing would be great and freshen up the game for a while longer than buffing an expansion that rotates in a year..

anyway I will suggest the buffs, they are either -1 mana +1 attack or +1 hp, if the card is so bad then -2 mana(like boomsday buffs)

I will choose cards that see no play at all and have space to open up a new archtype.

Druid (technically could buff almost ANY card, but I decided feral druid needs some love)

Savagery 1->0 mana  this card is really bad as is.. at least it should cost less.. also goes well with the next bufff.

Bite  4-> 3 mana this card never saw play (after it got nerfed in beta) druid has worse ramp right now it can be buffed.

Hunter - hunters got a strong classic set so..

King Krush 9-> 8 mana this card was ONLY good cause of [Hearthstone Card (katrena winterwisp) Not Found] otherwise it's terrible, with this buff it's a decent finisher if you can get there.. another suggestion could be +1 attack or even more minor +1 hp. it IS a legendary after all and the worst classic class legendary in that...

Gladiator's Longbow 2->3 durability, this card costs 7 mana! you are overpaying 2 mana over arcanite reaper for being immune which is a 0.5 mana effect looking at Candleshot this weapon has too little durability for how much it costs..

Paladin - not too much to buff here either, some card buffs might be too toxic for the game if buffed.

Lay on Hands - 8->7 mana at least lets you do something else the turn you play it..

Argent Protector 2/2->2/3 can't buff anything else there.. holy wrath is pointless and blessed champion would be too oppressive as a combo piece this card has a 0.5 mana cost effect attached to it.. could be a 2/3 really, great in arena.

Priest - his classic set SUCKS but can't be easily buffed in long term, but I did find 2 cards worthy low risk buffs.

Shadowform 3-> 2 mana hero power change cards cost 2 in other sets this card is fun to use but costs too much also you lose the healing for using it so.. yeah 2 mana.. still probably not playable but it's a fun card.

Holy Fire 6->5 mana could help priest since this card is played sometimes mostly cause of lack of other alternatives.. value wise 5 damage= 3.5 mana, 5 healing =1 mana bundling cost =0.5 good enough.

Rogue - just got nerfed but I got some unrelated archtype buffs.

Kidnapper - 5/3-> 5/4  this card is badly stated for it's cost

Patient Assassin - 1/1-> 1/2 it's a small buff but this guy is never played at all I am not sure though since arena exists.. and rogue is strong there..

Shaman the overload mechanic was underestimated as a drawback back in classic

Lightning Storm 3->2 mana, this card is not even played in shaman control decks, and is mostly a feelsbad when it is.. would rather lower the overload by 1, but I already stated that I would not change the card text.

Forked Lightning 1->0 mana this card is too weak atm

Warlock

Felguard 3->2 mana, if you are destroying one of you mana crystals.. it's better be worth it.. 1 mana "Cheat" for -1 mana the whole game? hell no..

Siphon Soul 6->5 mana overcosted removal, when it was played it was one of the worst cards in warlock..

Warrior

Mortal Strike 4->3 mana it's a fireball if you are meeting the requirement otherwise it's just an ok card

Cruel Taskmaster 2/2-> 3/2 more aggressively stated minion.

Mage

Icicle 2->1 mana worst card in mage, should not cost 2..

[Hearthstone Card (Etheral arcanist) Not Found] 3/3-> 3/4  never played card, easi'ish to counter.

Neutral

Illidan Stormrage 7/5-> 7/6 should be buffed.. I think his text should be more impactful but I can't change it by my own rules.

Arcane Golem 3-> 2 mana if you are giving your opponent a huge upside at least make it worth... was nerfed too hard..

I could puke. Honestly. After another game in arena where a extremely bad player once again got Kalecgos from Messenger Raven I was confused, bought HSreplay Premium and will uninstall this Activion $$$$ game.

Kalecgos is played after Messenger Raven in over 70% of players that score in average below 3 wins. Above the numbers go down until it is below 3%.

Do you honestly still think they don't use the same shit EA uses in Fifa, the worse you are the more luck and rigged matches? Believe in this and live in your world.
It is damn obvious.

Hey, quick quality of life request!

Is there any chance you could get the deck code copy feature to include the name of the deck when it's imported into hearthstone.

It works like that on HS Replay and is handier than having to rename "Custom Priest" each time!

Keep up the great work!

Don't these decks play very similarly? Play a minion, bounce it, play it, bounce it....stall until you have an unending supply of big, cheap minions. 

Edit: Cards seem to work as intended, however it is neat to notice that they trigger in the order they are played (with the ensuing effects): Polymorph and Exploding Runes alter the board entering minion (like status effects) and are copied IF the copying secret (Clone/Mirror) is played after and the copied minion is summonable

As time goes on, we get additional secrets which accumulate in Wild, therefore creating some new (and sometimes frustrating) interactions...

As I was revisiting Wild with a Reno Mage today, I came across an interaction I was pretty sure (might as well be false mem(e)ory) didn't worked that way before:

Secrets (in order played):

1. Potion of Polymorph
2. Frozen Clone

As the opponent played a minion, his minion got polymorphed and I got two Sheep. As I'm pretty sure this worked differently with Mirror Entity :

1. Is this a bug/feature? (i.e. is this interaction as it was implemented in the first place)
2. Are there other interesting interactions between secrets that are not apparent on first sight (like Misdirection and Freezing Trap)