I've built a lot of decks based on the "new" old cards for standard, and i've been going back and forth with n'zoth most of all, and there just isn't a lot of good deathrattles for him in the game IMO, khartut defender and sylvannus does not a deathrattle deck make
do you think a copy of The Soularium would work well in here? The mana curve seems pretty cheap, and it would be useful for finding Renounce Darkness. I'd probably cut a copy of Impbalming because it makes it harder to get a Renounce Darkness and there really isn't an upside for shuffling in 3 random class cards into a deck full of random class cards.
Use it if you got it of course, but i was going for as cheap as i possibly could so more people could have the option to play it, the soularium is a great card for renounce warlock since you can draw 3 with it and then renounce.
Just tired of pointing out things i think are bad with the deck on the page i am currently on and hearing people tell me i'm stupid because other decks exist.
You shouldn't play Subject 9 because he works against your game plan.
Secret paladin should be a midrange deck with his most powerfull play at turn 6 or as soon as possible after. And your are playing too many secrets here: 5 is the right number, because you want to be sure that avenge will be played by the Mysterious Challenger.
I suggest to you to cut Subject 9 and both mana addict for some good (3) mana minions, because you want to play your curve for the better. I would cut the wolf too, actually, for the same point. I see that you are playing a Glow-tron, maybe some kind of (2) and (3) mana mech synergy?
I agree somewhat, but i just don't know enough to build an aggro deck 100% entirely, i considered prince liam instead of subject 9.
Yes the subject 9 is not very good synergy-wise with the challenger but you could always just not play him if you so desire, there would be games hypothetically where you don't draw challengers and you'd have a ton of secrets. I mean the secret synergy of this deck is anti synergy with mysterious challenger. I think it's a well worth addition.
Everything else though i kinda agree on with you because like i said i'm bad at making aggro decks.
I hope all of the cards rotating back in are freebies that can't be disenchanted, that would make it great for playability for everyone, not everyone enjoys playing wild.
In case you're an aggro player and don't know how to use that brain you have, aggro is short for aggressive, mid-range, and tempo are aggressive decks, whereas control and combo are not. It's honestly retarded how i have to explain this shit.
so this deck is pretty trash, didn't give it much thought, the gameplan is to florist malygos, and then elise to get 2 two mana geese and then swipe moonfire, but that's not enough dmg, might come back and rethink it later.
And yeah, the undatakah keeps all the previous deathrattles, thanks to the prelate's "Keeps all enchantments" card text, so the order doesn't really matter, the combo only gets ruined sometimes if you play the prelate more than once.
I've built a lot of decks based on the "new" old cards for standard, and i've been going back and forth with n'zoth most of all, and there just isn't a lot of good deathrattles for him in the game IMO, khartut defender and sylvannus does not a deathrattle deck make
Deck i had a lot of fun with, only legend that REALLY matters is shrirvallah, but don't craft shit for tavern brawls.
But hey that's just a theory....
I included that many secrets for the sake of redundancy with subject nine and the mysterious challengers, but i can agree to what you are saying.
This is just a theorycraft afterall.
Use it if you got it of course, but i was going for as cheap as i possibly could so more people could have the option to play it, the soularium is a great card for renounce warlock since you can draw 3 with it and then renounce.
Just tired of pointing out things i think are bad with the deck on the page i am currently on and hearing people tell me i'm stupid because other decks exist.
I agree somewhat, but i just don't know enough to build an aggro deck 100% entirely, i considered prince liam instead of subject 9.
Yes the subject 9 is not very good synergy-wise with the challenger but you could always just not play him if you so desire, there would be games hypothetically where you don't draw challengers and you'd have a ton of secrets. I mean the secret synergy of this deck is anti synergy with mysterious challenger. I think it's a well worth addition.
Everything else though i kinda agree on with you because like i said i'm bad at making aggro decks.
Sorry i didn't realize we were talking about every single deck in the game....
Oh wait, i was just talking about this deck in particular.
It's a five card combo for mecha'thun warlock.
Galvonizer^2
Mecha'thun
Bloodbloom
cataclysm
You could easily, EASILY remove 2 cards for the good combo cards....
There have been plenty of decks with multiple win conditions, these win conditions weren't watered down to add in, this is a shit excuse.
Yeah i saw the plague of flames and thought that was for it, but it's just not as good as cata?
Cata nukes your entire hand for the win condition, that was why it was good, you didn't need to worry about expending all of your cards for it.
Why isn't meatwagon or phantom militia in this deck for synergy with summoning portals?
Mecha'thun without the warlock bloodbloom cataclysm combo?
Idk just seems very poorly made to me, but i haven't actually played it or seen it played. this is just from an outside perspective.
RENOUNCE DARKNESS!!!!!
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES
oh i missed the "Each card" bit my b
I hope all of the cards rotating back in are freebies that can't be disenchanted, that would make it great for playability for everyone, not everyone enjoys playing wild.
People complaining about combo decks when literally 90% of the meta is aggro, and only one control deck is viable lmao
Heavy aggressive rogue idea.
In case you're an aggro player and don't know how to use that brain you have, aggro is short for aggressive, mid-range, and tempo are aggressive decks, whereas control and combo are not. It's honestly retarded how i have to explain this shit.
so this deck is pretty trash, didn't give it much thought, the gameplan is to florist malygos, and then elise to get 2 two mana geese and then swipe moonfire, but that's not enough dmg, might come back and rethink it later.
Let me know if you try it out, hope you don't get shit on too badly
And yeah, the undatakah keeps all the previous deathrattles, thanks to the prelate's "Keeps all enchantments" card text, so the order doesn't really matter, the combo only gets ruined sometimes if you play the prelate more than once.