Weird how you ostracize feelings considering your use of anecdotes on the standard meta toward an experienced Classic player.
"They" found this deck way after deck trackers, & it was inevitable that deck doctors like myself tried a more aggressive variant of midrange.
Wouldn't you rather utilize a win percentage between two or more popular shaman decks that swap out Al'Akir for Windfury, Leeroy for Sylvanas, Sylvanas for Argent Commandeer? Or even bringing up each of those cards win-rates when drawn might suffice.
Please save your gripes about Standard balance for those articles, they are a lot more popular to the player-base and ripe with discussion.
If you play a lot of Shaman in Classic, you're going to realize that Lava Burst & Al'Akir don't fit in the same deck because playing Lava Burst makes Al'Akir unplayable next turn, and Al'Akir combo being a huge swing in tempo toward your opponent.
Thus why Windfury works better. Especially with a 6 drop your opponent doesn't want to clear. And Leeroy combo leaves no mana left for Lava Burst, thus why a sturdy body makes for a more reliable combo.
Got 'em
Loving the Spare Parts, Joust, & Recruit randomness!
Arcade Hecarim month,
Let's Go!
English...defiantly tuff.
Where are my buffs, Alec?
Ragnaros the Firelord & Sylvanas Windrunner
One can only dream
I'm really drawn to the Hunter deck, but I already have two of the legendaries, so I am going to get the DH one.
Not too hard of a grind to Diamond with the deck recipes.
3 mana 3/4 = problematic b/c universal
2 mana Rush+Windfury = harmless b/c niche
Glad you don't work balance 🤭
That price gouge will have Alleria sucking you dry faster than you can say Wailing Caverns ¯\_( ಥ ͜ʖ ಥ )/¯
As native to China, I agree!
Dumbest Brawl I have played in a long time. Why can't they just give mirror decks?
The social aspect is the most pressing, I delete most players who only come on to solo queue or for expansion releases.
Not tier 1, easily locked up by freeze mage, outpaced by combo druid, out of lethal range by control pally, and overwhelmed by face hunter
Downvoted for not following up on your comment.
Weird how you ostracize feelings considering your use of anecdotes on the standard meta toward an experienced Classic player.
"They" found this deck way after deck trackers, & it was inevitable that deck doctors like myself tried a more aggressive variant of midrange.
Wouldn't you rather utilize a win percentage between two or more popular shaman decks that swap out Al'Akir for Windfury, Leeroy for Sylvanas, Sylvanas for Argent Commandeer? Or even bringing up each of those cards win-rates when drawn might suffice.
Please save your gripes about Standard balance for those articles, they are a lot more popular to the player-base and ripe with discussion.
If you play a lot of Shaman in Classic, you're going to realize that Lava Burst & Al'Akir don't fit in the same deck because playing Lava Burst makes Al'Akir unplayable next turn, and Al'Akir combo being a huge swing in tempo toward your opponent.
Thus why Windfury works better. Especially with a 6 drop your opponent doesn't want to clear. And Leeroy combo leaves no mana left for Lava Burst, thus why a sturdy body makes for a more reliable combo.
Great Job Avelline!
Life is the longest thing I've yet to witness.
I've yet to transcend to cosmic being.