The same could be said for stealth. This keyword is like stealth, but weaker in the sense that the minions can still be targeted and stronger because it is permanent (unlike stealth).
I have been playing a lot of Galakrond Warlock, but I noticed, that most of my opponents were Shamans. Against those I really struggled to win, so i looked up, which deck was best against Shaman. Apparently Holy-Wrath-Paladin is doing pretty well against them and since I had all the necessary cards, I thought I'd give it a try. I played 10 games with it, but not a single Shaman (mostly Rogue, which is the strongest deck against Holy-Wrath-Paladin :D).
Then I switched back to Warlock and I faced 3 Shamans in a row, after that I stopped playing. The last SEVEN games with my Warlock Deck were against Shaman.
I'm not salty, I have a positive winrate after all, I just find it suspiciously unexpectable (statistically speaking). Has someone of you encountered a similar situation?
Or they could make it not so ridiculously overpriced.
I'm playing a Zoo Warlock and I usually win against DH unless they have Altruis.
Rez Priest
Cool deck, but too many legendaries, which I don't own.
Because of that I accidently bought DoD packs...
Fuck this card.
why would they reset?
Do you realize that it doesn't draw anymore?
If everything has cower, then face has taunt.
The same could be said for stealth. This keyword is like stealth, but weaker in the sense that the minions can still be targeted and stronger because it is permanent (unlike stealth).
2019: Battlegrounds
2020: Building new decks as always
I think this would be good if it summoned two 5/6 for 5 mana lol
Makes sense then, I somehow overlooked the Nether Breath.
Isn't the DK Guldan worth it in this kind of deck?
Why the Evasive Wyrms?
That's not true, until now I played 13 games with it and won 9 of them, without facing any shamans.
I know I sound like some flat-earther now :D
but yes, it seemed rigged.
Do you think Blizzard would actually do something like that? For example to keep winrates of certain decks in control.
Assuming 30% of decks are shaman decks, then the probability of not playing against shaman for 10 games in a row is less than 3%. (0.7^10)
Pretty low, but not impossible, I know, just found it really weird, that when I switched back I only faced shamans again.
I don't really know how to post an image, so here is a link to a screenshot of the decktracker:
https://ibb.co/0tPP0r3
I have been playing a lot of Galakrond Warlock, but I noticed, that most of my opponents were Shamans. Against those I really struggled to win, so i looked up, which deck was best against Shaman. Apparently Holy-Wrath-Paladin is doing pretty well against them and since I had all the necessary cards, I thought I'd give it a try. I played 10 games with it, but not a single Shaman (mostly Rogue, which is the strongest deck against Holy-Wrath-Paladin :D).
Then I switched back to Warlock and I faced 3 Shamans in a row, after that I stopped playing. The last SEVEN games with my Warlock Deck were against Shaman.
I'm not salty, I have a positive winrate after all, I just find it suspiciously unexpectable (statistically speaking). Has someone of you encountered a similar situation?