"Jump to latest post" doesn't jump me to latest post.

Could you provide me with an exact example of where this is happening, please? Thanks!

A link that doesn't work is kinda what I would have liked :P

Giving a link to an example is more helpful than telling me where it is because it is something that can be immediately acted upon and doesn't require me searching for the thread and the comment in question.

Whenever links can be included in a bug report, do it!

You can right-click (or similar on mobile) and copy the link address to get a link to submit.

Quote From frenzy

Example 1

On the deck of lunacy discussion thread: https://outof.cards/forums/hearthstone/card-discussion/6470-new-mage-spell-deck-of-lunacy

There are, at time of this comment, 59 replies - ie 3 pages.

On the bread crumb page navigator ( first, 1, 2, 3, last ), the links go to

a) On first page: X, X, 2, 3, 2 (expected: X, X, 2, 3, 3)

b) On last page: 2, 1, 2, X, X (expected: 1, 1, 2, X, X)

 

Example 2

On the deck discussion group level: https://outof.cards/forums/hearthstone/card-discussion

There are 59 pages (spoooooky!), just below the stickies, the page navigator, from page 1, links to: X, X, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 2

Whereas expected is probably more like: X, X, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 59

 

 

I think you may not be understanding how the pagination works, though please do correct me if I'm wrong.

The number that appears in the pagination square will always be the exact same as the page number that is in the link.

For myself, I see the following when visiting the card discussion forum for hearthstone:

As expected, they link as follows ([display in square] URL page number)

• [<] Inactive
• [1] Inactive
• [2] 2
• [3] 3
• [4] 4
• [5] 5
• [...] 6
• [59] 59
• [>] 2

When I got to page 10 of the card discussion forum, I get this

And works as expected:

• [<] 9
• [1] 1
• [...] 5
• [10] 10
• [...] 15
• [59] 59
• [>] 11

I do want to point out for absolute clarity that the < and > arrows will only ever go one page at a time. The code itself for the pagination template shows that every numbered square outputs the exact same number in the page id of the url.

Quote From anchorm4n

Ah thanks, now I get it. Do you still need them? 

Sinti has provided me with a couple of samples I need to investigate, but yes, yes, yes. Always, always, always provide examples when there are problems unless we tell people to stop submitting them =

I've pushed out a deploy that should resolve issues with comment jumps. Let me know if you run into any further issues with them after this point in time.