All Comments

This scares me beyond reason. 4-mana draw 2 is awful in any context even as a tutor...unless whatever you're tutoring will allow you to win the game really hard...and that is a very threatening image considering most of the combo stuff is rotating at this point.

This sounds really overpriced on paper. We've also seen the Demon hunter Sunken card already and it's not something that so insane that you would build a deck around tutoring it with this card.

This begs the question...what kind of insane combo is possible that would require this to be essentially an immesnly overcosted Crystology?

IT's the legendary, isn't it?

Super strong tutor card! Pretty much ½ extra mana for the tutor effect per draw!

Really love the flavour of this card!
A play on words, but fitting to the 'naga like spells' theme.

Great card for Naga decks.

Hope we get a legendary revealed soon.

My bad, I should’ve said “recycling” ideas

Probably more for decks that needs lots of naga synergy, or for pure minion decks. Because we're looking at a card that has a total cost of 5 casting a spell that cost 3 or less. Even a mere Venomous Scorpid costs 3 mana and allows for a wider range of spells to discover, on top of giving you another spell to trigger the requirements for other naga battlecries like Queen Azshara.

In some decks like a hypothetical naga hunter, which requires more nagas to trigger other stuff, this card may fill that part nicely. Most hunter spells tend to do damage anyway, so this card doesn't necessarily detract from the face strat.

The smallest other niche it has is bounce synergy. If you get a good spell on the 1/1, you can just bounce it back to hand and cast it over and over. Imagine getting Heavy Plate or Sinister Strike on it and repeatedly casting it. Of course there's going to be consistency issues, but the option is there, and depending on the meta might actually be plausible as a side strat.

This isnt a reprint

So, basically a cheaper Swampqueen Hagatha interesting, I tried to play Hagatha a lot during her time but her cost was a huge downside back then, I think this one will see more play.

On the other hand, can they stop with the reprints? 

Nice meme, but I feel like that's too random to every produce consistent result. A neat Naga generator to keep the chain going I guess, but I doubt that'l be necessary

I absolutely love the idea of Recipe, quite simple but also creative.

Some of these cards are way better in every way than most of the official ones.

better idea , remove the nature tag from Unstable Evolution

Quote From TheTriferianGeneral

What he said is kinda right: MTG aggro is faster than LoR aggro most of the time because aggro gets fewer time to build up and finsih in mtg.

With the cards he mentioned he also approved my theory of him being the typical monoblack player (that I am ... not the greatest fan of by the way)

That he calls removal too expansive also makes sense from a HS/Mtg perspective because there Control often doesn't bother to play units at all and gets along quite well with going full spell control because removal is a lot cheaper (which means most units have to create value immediately or on death to be relevant).

Where he is wrong imo is when it comes to keywords that give clear attacking benefits such like quick attack or overwhelm because those are necessary to break stalemates and make sense in a board centric game, where combat tricks can deal with these effects.

Overall I don't think you need to be so harsh with him to have his opinion on things.

He might be wrong at points but it's not easy for someone coming from other games to understand how LoR is working and how much detph lies within the priority system of the game.

I can agree with all said. Yeah, in MtG it's all about impact when we talk about control decks. All and all my view on the game could be wrong, which prolly is and I can't say otherwise because what I know and what I've seen so far is not the greatest data base for comparison tbf. But still, I can enjoy a first win of the day struggling with Karma /Sol or some retarded greedy comp up until I get a better understanding of the game. The game is clearly designed to be a minions clash with combat tricks and you either let it resolve or you interfere so, yeah I guess for some people it's better than trying to play around board clear or big minion with potential to turn the game around. MtG besides MonoBitch as they used to call it back in the days, I enjoy most of Izzet decks being burn control with insane card draw or mill, or good old 2021 Dragon Control. So,ya. As I said LoR is a decent game, lovely animations sometimes a bit too long but hey, its fancy. Design is overall good quality in terms of mechanics and core values of the game when it comes down to interactive gameplay. So, I guess I am on a quest to come up with a greedy 30% win rate at best deck, haha! I get it that some people will react negative to what I said, coming from a different universe where we play broken cards upon broken cards to defeat even more broken cards yeah, playing for board and buffing units will be a bit strange. Watching players shiver and  calculate how much to advance the board state waiting for "Wrath of God" ( Still legal card btw in MtG ) is just other type of fun, but also gives you time and slows down the pace of the game overall because if you overcommit you are kind of done. So,ya. I can't say that I hate the game, or that the game is just aggro, as I said there are combo decks, burn decks, some midrange but ya in general minions royal. So take it with a grain of salt. Also, I do listen to advice and I do take suggestions if they are explained stupid enough for someone like me who is obviously ignorant af. Before I forget, board development in LoR is slower compared to MtG, not that it's slow in LoR.   :) 

P.S Here is my definition of aggro for ya lad , "aggressive deck which attempts to win the game through persistent, quick damage dealing." Just saying. 

Stay safe, stay sexy and may the Doomskar be with ya!

Ooook, LFG didn't work so I did my part hahaha

Anyway both of them are 10 snowballs away of that triple tie at 313. Easy to achieve.

So when are they going to replace/rework the treasures for rotated stuff? Like priests' droplet of insanity? And the corruption card? (I may be mis-remembering)  (not that it ever really saw play)  

ignite might be slightly stronger since it doesn't need to be comboed.

What he said is kinda right: MTG aggro is faster than LoR aggro most of the time because aggro gets fewer time to build up and finsih in mtg.

With the cards he mentioned he also approved my theory of him being the typical monoblack player (that I am ... not the greatest fan of by the way)

That he calls removal too expansive also makes sense from a HS/Mtg perspective because there Control often doesn't bother to play units at all and gets along quite well with going full spell control because removal is a lot cheaper (which means most units have to create value immediately or on death to be relevant).

Where he is wrong imo is when it comes to keywords that give clear attacking benefits such like quick attack or overwhelm because those are necessary to break stalemates and make sense in a board centric game, where combat tricks can deal with these effects.

Overall I don't think you need to be so harsh with him to have his opinion on things.

He might be wrong at points but it's not easy for someone coming from other games to understand how LoR is working and how much detph lies within the priority system of the game.

Jezz, Russian localization screwed up once again, saying that it has to be Heroic. And I was trying heroic for a hour...

We still miss one legendary tied to Sunken City