All Comments

9/26: Death Knight, Mage and Hunter sets are completed. Two Neutral cards, 8/10 of the Rogue set and 7/10 of the Demon Hunter set is completed

 The Galactic Projection Orb x3, Conniving Conman x2

When it comes to making deposits at online casinos, Interac has always been my go-to. It's quick, reliable, and secure. I’ve never had any issues using it for my casino transactions. If you’re curious about where you can use it, take a look at this link https://ca.casinologin.mobi/payments/interac-casinos/. Definitely worth considering if you prioritize safety and efficiency!

The nerfs didn't do anything - first game after the patch, my opponent played Tsunami SEVEN times, and Sunset Volley FIVE times. Not touching standard until next set.

• Sometimes I think my Wordle luck is like a magic spell—sometimes it works, and sometimes I just get hexed!
•  

Okay, I think I hit on everything that has been mentioned so far, including a reworked iteration of The Emerald Nightmare which I forgot about. Speaking of:

You can knock the Windfury as being not-kosher 'cause "Windfury is a Shaman keyword", but then I'd ask why Goldwing exists. I'm implying here with the Windfury and the "must attack" clause that your hero is lashing out at enemies out of fear; therefore, it feels appropriate enough for me. I'm not inclined to remove it, because I really like my Druid of the Nightmare and the general Windfury vs Lifesteal choice. That will probably reappear in a different form on another card or two.

Quote From linkblade91

Quote From shatterstar1998

I double check everything and after the hype die down there is some minor wording tweak that needed to be fix.

• What does the effect of Sir Zeliek actually do? Does he only interact with card creation from hand? Or he also intended to interact with card creation on board? If it is the latter he need to change his wording to "create and summon".
• The DK explanation is kind of victim - blamey. Most of the DK are written as innocent victims of Arthas and Ner'zhul, which is part of their tragedy. I think the wording should be suffer for "his" (The Lich King) sin, which also go with the Sorrow theme you are trying to depict.
• Does Sha of Hatred only affect minions? Or does it affect everything? (Spells, Weapons, Hero Power etc.) that can be targeted?
• Kael'thas the Fel is missing some wording. It should be return a copy to your hand that cost (0).
• Failure's Toll wording seems like a little awkward. Maybe switch to Destroy your hero? Or to be more flavorful, "be consumed by the Burning Legion".

Thanks for going through it :)

1. Sir Zeliek is supposed to be the Augmented Elekk of copying effects like with Shambling Zombietank and/or Zola the Gorgon, although now that I've said that I wonder if this effect should just be an Epic instead.
2. "(S)uffer for their sins" is to suggest that they feel endless remorse for what they did while they had no control over their bodies. Sir Zeliek is the story Legendary because he held onto his holy abilities even as a DK, and in-so-doing felt great sorrow for wielding the Light in the name of evil. I can reword it if that is a problem.
3. Sha of Hatred effects everything. I was trying to create an aura that emphasized purging all enemies before you can go Face, because one's Hatred would push them to spare no one. Giving every minion Taunt would do the trick, but that might be kinda boring. It's another one I'm not a fan of at-present.
4. Kael'thas returns the copy to you at full price, although it can be discounted and/or played later; making it just automatically 0-Mana would be an additional bonus. Not saying it can't be there - just that it's not strictly "missing" because it was not my intention.
   1. Edit: I see the confusion. The (0) is the number of spells you've cast: (1), (2), etc. etc. The period is in the wrong place lol
5. The Failure's Toll phrasing using "you die" comes from Bonelord Frostwhisper, and because I like that it's only 2 lines long, but I can change it if need be.

I genuinely think if that is how Zeliek is intended to work it would be way too weak for a archetype supporting Lengendary. If you intend to keep it that way I think having it be an Epic would be better. If you want it to be a Lengedary I think buffing it to also summon additional copies would be more appropriate 

Okay, now you explain what you intend for the DK it made more sense. But I do think it might need some rewording from "forever suffer" to something like "forever redeeming for their sins".

If that is your intention for the Sha you can change the wording into something like No other card or effect can target heroes.

If that is your base wording for Failure's Toil then I can't really say anything. So I concede to that.

Quote From shatterstar1998

I double check everything and after the hype die down there is some minor wording tweak that needed to be fix.

• What does the effect of Sir Zeliek actually do? Does he only interact with card creation from hand? Or he also intended to interact with card creation on board? If it is the latter he need to change his wording to "create and summon".
• The DK explanation is kind of victim - blamey. Most of the DK are written as innocent victims of Arthas and Ner'zhul, which is part of their tragedy. I think the wording should be suffer for "his" (The Lich King) sin, which also go with the Sorrow theme you are trying to depict.
• Does Sha of Hatred only affect minions? Or does it affect everything? (Spells, Weapons, Hero Power etc.) that can be targeted?
• Kael'thas the Fel is missing some wording. It should be return a copy to your hand that cost (0).
• Failure's Toll wording seems like a little awkward. Maybe switch to Destroy your hero? Or to be more flavorful, "be consumed by the Burning Legion".

Thanks for going through it :)

1. Sir Zeliek is supposed to be the Augmented Elekk of copying effects like with Shambling Zombietank and/or Zola the Gorgon, although now that I've said that I wonder if this effect should just be an Epic instead.
2. "(S)uffer for their sins" is to suggest that they feel endless remorse for what they did while they had no control over their bodies. Sir Zeliek is the story Legendary because he held onto his holy abilities even as a DK, and in-so-doing felt great sorrow for wielding the Light in the name of evil. I can reword it if that is a problem.
3. Sha of Hatred effects everything. I was trying to create an aura that emphasized purging all enemies before you can go Face, because one's Hatred would push them to spare no one. Giving every minion Taunt would do the trick, but that might be kinda boring. It's another one I'm not a fan of at-present.
4. Kael'thas returns the copy to you at full price, although it can be discounted and/or played later; making it just automatically 0-Mana would be an additional bonus. Not saying it can't be there - just that it's not strictly "missing" because it was not my intention.
   1. Edit: I see the confusion. The (0) is the number of spells you've cast: (1), (2), etc. etc. The period is in the wrong place lol
5. The Failure's Toll phrasing using "you die" comes from Bonelord Frostwhisper, and because I like that it's only 2 lines long, but I can change it if need be.

I double check everything and after the hype die down there is some minor wording tweak that needed to be fix.

• What does the effect of Sir Zeliek actually do? Does he only interact with card creation from hand? Or he also intended to interact with card creation on board? If it is the latter he need to change his wording to "create and summon".
• The DK explanation is kind of victim - blamey. Most of the DK are written as innocent victims of Arthas and Ner'zhul, which is part of their tragedy. I think the wording should be suffer for "his" (The Lich King) sin, which also go with the Sorrow theme you are trying to depict.
• Does Sha of Hatred only affect minions? Or does it affect everything? (Spells, Weapons, Hero Power etc.) that can be targeted?
• Kael'thas the Fel is missing some wording. It should be return a copy to your hand that cost (0).
• Failure's Toll wording seems like a little awkward. Maybe switch to Destroy your hero? Or to be more flavorful, "be consumed by the Burning Legion".

Thank you. It is fixed.

I mean edit to a thread post. Edit to a reply to a thread seems to work fine

Mini set: Happily Ever After

Inspiration:

Neutral

Death Knight

Demon Hunter

Druid

Hunter

Mage

Paladin

Priest

Rogue

Shaman

Warlock

Warrior

Quote From TeraNova

How can you have a game without meta?

You can. It's just hard and requires desire to do it. And knowledge ofc.

I think I know the problem. The link that is the "Official" link in your profile is:

https://outof.games/forums/fan-creations/custom-hearthstone/1989-custom-expansion-the-trials-within-us

While the link that has all the comments in this page is:

https://outof.games/realms/hearthstone/14z/custom-expansion-the-trials-within-us/

So the links are slightly different.

Good UI and simplicity. Other card games have this tendency to complicate shit right out the gate without necessary adding any depth or playability. The UI in HS is also really simple with potential to adding variety in board presentation without complicating too much and impede clarity.

In Hearthstone, reduce the number of random discovers. Having a few random cards discovered each game is OK and keeps the game surprising but playing against a deck (looking at you Rogue) that continually discovers random cards and then plays them over and over again (looking at you Tess) is just plain boring for the other player, not to mention the frustration. Just my opinion, though.

How can you have a game without meta?

Last weekend, my friends and I decided to try our luck with some online casino games in Bangladesh. We landed on https://jeetbuzzbd.com/ and were impressed by the extensive selection available. From classic slots to modern table games, there was something for everyone. The secure payment methods also gave us peace of mind, making our gaming experience both fun and safe. It’s definitely a site we return to regularly.

Quote From ashlynbal04

I think almost every druid deck would play The Emerald Nightmare in its current state. If I understand correctly, this attack doesn't disappear off of your turn

...

Maybe reduce the attack bonus or remove the double damage to minions at that point, since 4 damage can kill a lot of things, especially in the early game.

Thanks for the feedback!

It is supposed to turn off - I just ran out of room on the card lol. The Trial also said +1 Attack originally but I buffed it, concerned it was too weak. I can always change it back 🙂

I think almost every druid deck would play The Emerald Nightmare in its current state. If I understand correctly, this attack doesn't disappear off of your turn, so even without the other benefits, it effectively says "whenever a minion attacks your hero, deal 4 damage to it."

Aggressive decks would love this card because of the aformentiomed defense against other aggro, and requiring you to attack every turn isn't much of a downside when going face costs you nothing. For those decks, it might as well say "deal 2 damage to the enemy hero every turn."

I haven't made custom cards in a while, but I think if you want to make this less problematic while keeping the flavor, you can have the attack only be on your turn, and require the hero to attack a minion every turn (if possible). Maybe reduce the attack bonus or remove the double damage to minions at that point, since 4 damage can kill a lot of things, especially in the early game.

It's essential to choose platforms that are well-regulated and provide a transparent experience. For Canadian players, one reliable option is Rama Casino, known for its strong reputation in Canada. The platform ensures a safe and fair environment for its users. You can explore more about it through Rama Casino.