I can confirm that you are correct. I calculated the second deck, as if I counted duplicates as one card, and the result is exactly 17720. So, it seems that there's a problem within calculation system regarding duplicates. I look forward to see this issue patched out, Chimera, and have a good day :D
P.S: When will we see emojis? I just copied emojis from my phone and it worked but there's no button for emojis while writing a comment.
One thing I didn't like on Hearthpwn is that there were errors when it comes to Total Dust calculation. If you look at this deck, you need 15020 dust to craft it. However, when I calculated the required dust with either Excel or calculator, it's exactly 15420, which is 400 off. Picture is here:
Then I checked my another deck, which requires 17720 dust to craft. Yet, it shows I need 19940 dust to craft, which is 2220 off. Here is the proof:
I just noticed while looking at Ethereal Peddler. I presume you Devs/Admins/Staff utilized database taken from Hearthpwn/HSGamepedia. Either case, they are wrong except the last Patch Change Note from HSGamepedia and here is the proof:
I am not sure if other cards -be it from Standard or Wild- are wrong, but if I find another one, I will sure post it here.
In any Control Rogue deck (N'Zoth/Big/Reno)or Thief Rogue, he is insane, not kidding. The worst part is that majority of Wild players don't know about him, including you, so it's natural to have bias towards Gallywix. Try to build a deck including him, then let me know if Gallywix is good or bad.
In Wild, Gallywix is one of the best 6-Mana drops in Hearthstone, and the best 6-Mana Rogue minion for me. Rather than Thief Rogue, you can use him in Reno Rogue or Control Rogue. In short, Gallywix can fit in any Rogue deck. Think of him like this: You play Valeera for 9-Mana. You only hide for a turn, do nothing, and lose a huge-tempo afterwards. However, when you drop Gallywix, you will be far ahead.
If you have all cards, then Cutthroat Buccaneer would be cut for Valeera since your aim is to focus on weapon. I have her in my collection, however 9-mana and do nothing but hide seems too late, and may cost a huge tempo-loss. It's the same reason why I didn't use Tess. At most, I have 7-mana card in this deck, and Tempo-Mana relation matters a lot for this deck.
I support this. Wild is not a format to be bullied. As a Wild player, I want equality. It's like we are viewed as 3rd world countries, which makes me hurt most.
Oh, was it $50? I thought King Rastakhan was purchased under the $80 bundle. Either case, what I'm pointing is that, with cheap bundles giving away both packs and heroes, it's perfect way to attract more people like me who like to spend as minimum as possible for more outcome. This is what pre-bundles should have been, not behind a huge pay-wall like 50$ or 80$.
Let's see. 15 packs were sold for 20$, while this bundle offers 20 packs for 20$. Thus, a pack for a dollar? Very profitable. Then, you will get a new Shaman hero and a new cardback as bonus? This bundle is worth purchasing. If you couldn't purchase Rastakhan bundle, where they sold 80 packs+King Rastakhan for 80$, now is the time for new bundle to purchase. I personally didn't purchase Rastakhan bundle at that time because 80$ looked such a rip-off from a customer to only gain a "exclusive" cosmetic item. Only if Blizzard sold us small bundle like they are offering right now, I would buy that at Rastakhan era. So, it looks like a dream came true.
I noticed your update regarding Augmented Elekk and I am here for one great advice: Use Weasel Tunneler. When you are about to kill Weasel, play Elekk to shuffle an extra copy. Also, you use Desert Camel so that you can fetch your Weasel. Give it a try, you won't regret that.
This has been fixed now, 9 of them were for different classes and I've now added the class name after each one. The last remaining one is Neutral, which was meant to be the general Unknown for all classes but at least for now it doesn't work like that.
That's good to hear. Thank you, Frosty. So, is it possible to change "Is Standard" to "Deck Format Type"? Pretty please?
Maybe not a good title, but a good request. Let's say I wanted to check a deck. On Hearthpwn, at first sight, I saw it. However, at OutOfCards, there is none of it. Could you devs/staff add it? As a suggestion, you can add under the card-list.
If this request was mentioned before, and you devs/staff are working on it, please disregard my request because I couldn't find any topic regarding this request.
This update is what I wanted the most. Now, it's as if I'm surfing on Hearthpwn but better. Thank you Flux and the dear Staff.
Just in case you need feedback/bug reports regarding the recent update, I'm posting here for convenience:
Here, on "Archetype" selection, there are 10 "Unknown"s. It's weird to see there are 10 of it, not one.
Might sound childish/weird, but please change "Is Standard" to "Deck Format Type", just like on Hearthpwn. Also, you developers/staff are aiming to support Magic as well, if I recall. So, "Deck Format Type" will sound better, both for Hearthstone, and Magic, and any card game you are aiming to support.
Just like what you developers/staff did with this update, could you release similar of it but aiming to personal profile deckpages? So that, within my profile, I can filter/sort my decks here as well, similar to Hearthpwn.
No need to change, I am fine with how it looks. As I am trying to migrate my decks -and guides- from Hearthpwn to here, I will sure let you know if that issue happens again.
I can confirm that you are correct. I calculated the second deck, as if I counted duplicates as one card, and the result is exactly 17720. So, it seems that there's a problem within calculation system regarding duplicates. I look forward to see this issue patched out, Chimera, and have a good day :D
P.S: When will we see emojis? I just copied emojis from my phone and it worked but there's no button for emojis while writing a comment.
One thing I didn't like on Hearthpwn is that there were errors when it comes to Total Dust calculation. If you look at this deck, you need 15020 dust to craft it. However, when I calculated the required dust with either Excel or calculator, it's exactly 15420, which is 400 off. Picture is here:
Then I checked my another deck, which requires 17720 dust to craft. Yet, it shows I need 19940 dust to craft, which is 2220 off. Here is the proof:
So, which one is wrong? Me or website?
Wow, is it possible to do that? Then, I guess there is no need to hunt the cards. Hats off to you, Chimera, you can close the thread if needed.
I just noticed while looking at Ethereal Peddler. I presume you Devs/Admins/Staff utilized database taken from Hearthpwn/HSGamepedia. Either case, they are wrong except the last Patch Change Note from HSGamepedia and here is the proof:
I am not sure if other cards -be it from Standard or Wild- are wrong, but if I find another one, I will sure post it here.
I am in tears of joy right now. A dedicated spot for Wild decks? Hell yeah, it's about time :D
You guys/gals are doing great job improving OutofCards website. Keep up the good work, I am rooting for all of you.
In any Control Rogue deck (N'Zoth/Big/Reno) or Thief Rogue, he is insane, not kidding. The worst part is that majority of Wild players don't know about him, including you, so it's natural to have bias towards Gallywix. Try to build a deck including him, then let me know if Gallywix is good or bad.
In Wild, Gallywix is one of the best 6-Mana drops in Hearthstone, and the best 6-Mana Rogue minion for me. Rather than Thief Rogue, you can use him in Reno Rogue or Control Rogue. In short, Gallywix can fit in any Rogue deck. Think of him like this: You play Valeera for 9-Mana. You only hide for a turn, do nothing, and lose a huge-tempo afterwards. However, when you drop Gallywix, you will be far ahead.
If you have all cards, then Cutthroat Buccaneer would be cut for Valeera since your aim is to focus on weapon. I have her in my collection, however 9-mana and do nothing but hide seems too late, and may cost a huge tempo-loss. It's the same reason why I didn't use Tess. At most, I have 7-mana card in this deck, and Tempo-Mana relation matters a lot for this deck.
Fireguard Destroyer
Look for a minion that has same tribe with different class.
I support this. Wild is not a format to be bullied. As a Wild player, I want equality. It's like we are viewed as 3rd world countries, which makes me hurt most.
Test Subject
Look for a card with similar ability. (Hint: 2-mana)
Oh, was it $50? I thought King Rastakhan was purchased under the $80 bundle. Either case, what I'm pointing is that, with cheap bundles giving away both packs and heroes, it's perfect way to attract more people like me who like to spend as minimum as possible for more outcome. This is what pre-bundles should have been, not behind a huge pay-wall like 50$ or 80$.
Let's see. 15 packs were sold for 20$, while this bundle offers 20 packs for 20$. Thus, a pack for a dollar? Very profitable. Then, you will get a new Shaman hero and a new cardback as bonus? This bundle is worth purchasing. If you couldn't purchase Rastakhan bundle, where they sold 80 packs+King Rastakhan for 80$, now is the time for new bundle to purchase. I personally didn't purchase Rastakhan bundle at that time because 80$ looked such a rip-off from a customer to only gain a "exclusive" cosmetic item. Only if Blizzard sold us small bundle like they are offering right now, I would buy that at Rastakhan era. So, it looks like a dream came true.
Sure, I will keep it up, no worries there. After migrating my stuff/decks from Hearthpwn to OoC, I will build new decks.
I noticed your update regarding Augmented Elekk and I am here for one great advice: Use Weasel Tunneler. When you are about to kill Weasel, play Elekk to shuffle an extra copy. Also, you use Desert Camel so that you can fetch your Weasel. Give it a try, you won't regret that.
Yaay! Never expected my deck to shine on spotlight.
Also, hail friend :D
That's good to hear. Thank you, Frosty. So, is it possible to change "Is Standard" to "Deck Format Type"? Pretty please?
Maybe not a good title, but a good request. Let's say I wanted to check a deck. On Hearthpwn, at first sight, I saw it. However, at OutOfCards, there is none of it. Could you devs/staff add it? As a suggestion, you can add under the card-list.
If this request was mentioned before, and you devs/staff are working on it, please disregard my request because I couldn't find any topic regarding this request.
This update is what I wanted the most. Now, it's as if I'm surfing on Hearthpwn but better. Thank you Flux and the dear Staff.
Just in case you need feedback/bug reports regarding the recent update, I'm posting here for convenience:
Have a good day!
No need to change, I am fine with how it looks. As I am trying to migrate my decks -and guides- from Hearthpwn to here, I will sure let you know if that issue happens again.