Getting closer and closer to the 1000 wins with Priest and Warrior. Hunter is getting close too, but I'm in no rush to add it to my collection of unplayed skins ^^
Well, the nuance from Standard to Wild is about the same as the distinction between Squares and Rectangles ; the first can also qualify for the latest but not the other way around.
It kinda reminds me of the recurring cycle we had on Hearthpwn : ''.. but I don't like community creation'', ''Keep 'hem off the front page'', etc. ... so don't click a link that is obviously about an other game, it is that simple my friend. Also, on a slow week in HS world, would you rather no news?
There used to be a time when HS similarities to MtG were pointed out, which is only fair when influences are notable and anchored in time. Now, is Riot paying tribute with subtle Easter eggs - to put it lightly - or is this a straight case of plagiary? What do you think?
There was quite a few glitches with the new hero portraits, and one noticeable difference after the patch was that the decks with new skins were accurately displayed. Fluxx named a few fix and updates but I also suspect way more than meets the eyes.
I manage to kill heroic Tekahn by burning half of his second deck - the C'Thun's one - with Void Contract, just a bit after I commented here. My Reno deck was almost empty, 2 cards were left, and the boss just changed up his. I'd say it is as effective as it gets.
I can't even make Paladin or Warlock portrait as favorite - well, I can click it, but the change never registers - ... for whatever obscure reason, it works for Rogue, but its the one I wasn't wanting to use ... Is this an other case of Spaghetti coding?
Getting closer and closer to the 1000 wins with Priest and Warrior.
Hunter is getting close too, but I'm in no rush to add it to my collection of unplayed skins ^^
You know, he's not wrong. That's 2-3 alternatives solution he pointed out, but hey ^^
Well, the nuance from Standard to Wild is about the same as the distinction between Squares and Rectangles ;
the first can also qualify for the latest but not the other way around.
Edit, Report & Delete ^^
Quote
Reply
Comment
A ''reward'' for money isn't exactly rewarding per say.
Sporadic usage of rarely occurring words is both remarkable and commendable!
You should have asked for a Gwent section in the midst of Blitzchung controversy, it would have been so fitting with the whole Witcher3' meme
+1 for casually using "Flabbergast" in this week's introduction
It kinda reminds me of the recurring cycle we had on Hearthpwn : ''.. but I don't like community creation'', ''Keep 'hem off the front page'', etc. ... so don't click a link that is obviously about an other game, it is that simple my friend.
Also, on a slow week in HS world, would you rather no news?
I came here for quality comment and this is the first thing I see ...
There used to be a time when HS similarities to MtG were pointed out, which is only fair when influences are notable and anchored in time. Now, is Riot paying tribute with subtle Easter eggs - to put it lightly - or is this a straight case of plagiary?
What do you think?
There was quite a few glitches with the new hero portraits, and one noticeable difference after the patch was that the decks with new skins were accurately displayed.
Fluxx named a few fix and updates but I also suspect way more than meets the eyes.
I didn't saw Purple v Bloodyface, but by the sound of it, it must be a thrilling one.
I manage to kill heroic Tekahn by burning half of his second deck - the C'Thun's one - with Void Contract, just a bit after I commented here.
My Reno deck was almost empty, 2 cards were left, and the boss just changed up his. I'd say it is as effective as it gets.
I can't even make Paladin or Warlock portrait as favorite - well, I can click it, but the change never registers - ... for whatever obscure reason, it works for Rogue, but its the one I wasn't wanting to use ...
Is this an other case of Spaghetti coding?