iWatchUSleep

Quote From frenzy

Quote From iWatchUSleep

Sidenote: The chances of you losing just because your opponent has Zilliax and you don't are very low. There were most likely many other factors that caused you to lose …

Either compare your legendaries with a meta report and see which ones aren't included. Or post your legendaries and rares here so that we can help.

Sidenote: The chances of you losing just because your opponent has [card] Zilliax …

Note: What I'm about to write below concerns wild. Priest's state in standard is abysmal because of its terrible classic set. If Blizzard want to fix priests awful standard state during the start of each year, they should either buff …

Financially, I think it would be better for Blizzard to create new cards, rather than readding wild cards back to standard. It incentivices people to buy more standard packs, as opposed to the people who still have their dirty rats …

Duel links is the one that doesn't have the whole link summoning bullshit, right?

I mean... you got matched up with that "extremely bad player". What does that say about you then...?

I love it when Big Priests get destroyed. Even more so when they're running godawful lists like that guy you were facing.

Nice work.

Quote From uhuglue

Does the elemental 'win' you situations more as the 6/5 body, or the 3dmg battlecry, what do you think?

It's both. The 3 damage could give you that last bit of burst …

Why aren't you running the good even shaman list? (Minus the windfury)

Not only is the matchmaking not rigged, you just happened to be unlucky, but only three games as a sample size and you think the game is rigged? That amount is beyond low and completely negligible.

I'd say that depends on the meta. If there are decks that can have a reasonable answer on the turn that specific crazy shit happens, I'd be fine with it. Problems arise when decks can have a massive board which …

Quote From doingtheobvious

Quote From iWatchUSleep

That wasn't an option.

Did it specifically state 'oh, by the way Zilliax is a no-go. Not now, not ever.'? No? Then Zilliax …

Quote From doingtheobvious

Zilliax is a must-have from TBD. Doubly so for any kind of mech or magnetic list.

That wasn't an option.

The card is -just- good enough to play in bomb hunter. Buffing it will only make the deck stronger, yet it's already one of the strongest decks out there. I think the card is fine as it is.

Don't you ever kick the, or any, for that matter, dog.

Your decks never disappoint. Good stuff!

[card]archivist elysiana[/card], in my opinion, is a horrible card. She's only run in control decks. And because she's run in those decks, every single control deck is forced to run her, despite her not being of any use in any …

• "Fighting against another Warrior? Concede." Basically what I've been doing ever since the release of RoS.

[card]archivist elysiana[/card] is pretty much required for control warrior and control shaman, and arguably for bomb warrior too. Without that card the former two decks would lose all mirror matches due to hitting fatigue a lot faster.

[card]chef nomi[/card] …

I'm on my phone so can't easily link decks but for the wild side of things:

Jade druid is a great control-style deck.

If you want a combo druid deck then basically anything with Aviana/Kun is still somewhat …