"It's complicated and will be answered soonish. It's a good change."
= ""We ourselves don`t know yet how it will look like and the question will be answered in a few months when the changes are happening. It will be a good change for our wallets." ;)
"In the coming months, we’ll be sharing some more details about what the changes are and why you should be hyped for them no matter what type of player you are."
Man, this part really scares me the most. Anytime they´ve said we should be hyped or excited, something bad has happened afterwards :/
Ha ha, like no "you will be excited" but "you should be excited", because if we will not be excited the devs will argue again that we don`t understand the changes well enough and our math is wrong. XD
Ah at last, a balance patch! Wild is sav....oh...oh, never mind then. I guess I can find solace in the fact I don't have to climb anymore this month.
Im happy is no wilds nerfs, the format is egenrly if blizz doesnt touchit(rto much) and if anythign we neds huffs and unenrfs and give all their tolsl(again) for wild not destory more cards/nerf for the sake of it.
Wild also certainyl deosnt needs nerfs to something jsut casue tis good/been around for then 1expac. If anything that belogns in standar btu really shouldnt be mentatlity for any format.
I would like to have a "Speed mode" or just the option to speed up the game in general. Especially the animations are all waaay to slow! You should have the option to set the animation speed to 2x, 3x or even 4x.
I would be surprised if they change a lot of old cards to make them more viable.
I guess they could just put some more cards in the HOF this year and bring some new classic cards. I doubt that this will make the classic set more relevant overall, but at least some problematic cards could finally leave the format. I am looking at you Highrollwin van Cleef...
I would be so happy if they make the bird viable again. Yes, it is a strong card, but for wild no op at all compared to way, way stronger cards in this format.
also don't get offended when you get downvoted specially when you said something you know might be unpopular
For example when you express the opinion that a control deck should be nerfed, because all smart players know that only aggro decks have to be nerfed. Always. ^^
It's easier to win against a deck that wins after 20 turns than one that wins after 4 maybe that's why
Name one deck in the current meta which (regulary) wins after 4 turns, please.
token druid totem shaman demon hunte
Demon Hunter on turn 4? Never seen before. And yes the other two decks can kill you with a perfect draw, when the enemy does nothing for 3 turns. But my question was: "Name one deck in the current meta which (regulary) wins after 4 turns". I played Aggro Druid more than once to get Legend and I can tell you that you not regulary kill your opponent in 4 turns with this deck. 5, 6, 7 turns sure thats the norm - but in 4 turns is an exception and not the rule.
And Totem Shaman is so weak at the moment, on turn 4 is often the time they surrender, because I kept their board constantly low so there is no "turn 4 wombo combo" with the axe and no real way to come back for them on the board.
EDIT: About the real topic: Maybe it could make sense that there is not in every part of this site and up- and downvote feature. As several users stated this feature can be useful to identify troll comments in the news section faster. But in some parts of the site I think this feature is "kind of useless", because it just shows how popular an opinion is, which says little to nothing about the quality of the rated post.
also don't get offended when you get downvoted specially when you said something you know might be unpopular
For example when you express the opinion that a control deck should be nerfed, because all smart players know that only aggro decks have to be nerfed. Always. ^^
It's easier to win against a deck that wins after 20 turns than one that wins after 4 maybe that's why
Name one deck in the current meta which (regulary) wins after 4 turns, please.
also don't get offended when you get downvoted specially when you said something you know might be unpopular
For example when you express the opinion that a control deck should be nerfed, because all smart players know that only aggro decks have to be nerfed. Always. ^^
Or how about an option to deactivate seeable up- and downvotes? I have no real interest in seeing how "the majority" likes or dislikes certain posts. I want an "unrated" look on posts I read for the first time.
"It's complicated and will be answered soonish. It's a good change."
= ""We ourselves don`t know yet how it will look like and the question will be answered in a few months when the changes are happening. It will be a good change for our wallets." ;)
I have reached my goal for this month (Legend in Wild and Dia 5 in Standard) so this deck is a nice idea to toy around at some days this month.
Thanks for the deck list!
I am missing Astromancer Solarian any ideas what I could play instead? At the moment I put another Frostbolt in the deck.
Ha ha, like no "you will be excited" but "you should be excited", because if we will not be excited the devs will argue again that we don`t understand the changes well enough and our math is wrong. XD
It`s obvious that you don`t play Wild...
Because?
Beside that: Blizz allready mentioned they will looking for nerfs.
I like these nerfs and I am excited which will follow soon.
Priest is completely broken in Wild. Here some suggestions how to balance it.
Wave of Apathy -> 2 mana
Mass Hysteria -> 6 mana
Psychic Scream -> 8 mana
Palm Reading -> 4 mana
Archmage Vargoth -> 5 mana
Raise Dead -> 1 mana
Spirit Lash -> 3 mana
And no I don`t vote for one of these nerfs, I vote for ALL of them.
PS: Over 40% of my meta at rank diamond 5 is Priest.
Only real downsite is, that this isn`t a neutral card. :(
I would like to have a "Speed mode" or just the option to speed up the game in general. Especially the animations are all waaay to slow! You should have the option to set the animation speed to 2x, 3x or even 4x.
I stumbled over this stream for myself and allready got 1 Pack after like 1,5 hours.
Thanks to Alleria, it's a nice idea to make this thread so maybe some more users can get 1-2 extra packs from the stream. :)
I would be surprised if they change a lot of old cards to make them more viable.
I guess they could just put some more cards in the HOF this year and bring some new classic cards. I doubt that this will make the classic set more relevant overall, but at least some problematic cards could finally leave the format. I am looking at you Highrollwin van Cleef...
I would be so happy if they make the bird viable again. Yes, it is a strong card, but for wild no op at all compared to way, way stronger cards in this format.
A Classic Pack.
Demon Hunter on turn 4? Never seen before. And yes the other two decks can kill you with a perfect draw, when the enemy does nothing for 3 turns. But my question was: "Name one deck in the current meta which (regulary) wins after 4 turns". I played Aggro Druid more than once to get Legend and I can tell you that you not regulary kill your opponent in 4 turns with this deck. 5, 6, 7 turns sure thats the norm - but in 4 turns is an exception and not the rule.
And Totem Shaman is so weak at the moment, on turn 4 is often the time they surrender, because I kept their board constantly low so there is no "turn 4 wombo combo" with the axe and no real way to come back for them on the board.
EDIT: About the real topic: Maybe it could make sense that there is not in every part of this site and up- and downvote feature. As several users stated this feature can be useful to identify troll comments in the news section faster. But in some parts of the site I think this feature is "kind of useless", because it just shows how popular an opinion is, which says little to nothing about the quality of the rated post.
Name one deck in the current meta which (regulary) wins after 4 turns, please.
For example when you express the opinion that a control deck should be nerfed, because all smart players know that only aggro decks have to be nerfed. Always. ^^
Or how about an option to deactivate seeable up- and downvotes? I have no real interest in seeing how "the majority" likes or dislikes certain posts. I want an "unrated" look on posts I read for the first time.
Sadly a only very tiny nerf.
Zephyrs.
Bye bye my golden Polkelt! ^.^
Only downside for me is, that my Aggro-Druid got nerfed by this patch. But I think reader is still viable in this deck (maybe now only as a one off).
EDIT: Oh by the way, Reader is now available in odd decks in wild... this will be "funny". ^^*