New Paladin Spell - Sand Breath

Submitted 5 years ago by

A new Common Paladin Spell, Sand Breath, has been revealed!

Sand Breath Card Image

Discuss this card below or head on over to the card page to give it a rating!


Learn more about Descent of Dragons

Head on over to our dedicated guide for Descent of Dragons!


Get Cheaper Card Packs

This section contains affiliate links.

If you want to save money when buying Hearthstone packs, you should check out Amazon Coins! It's an easy way to save up to 25% off Hearthstone packs so you can get into the new expansion without worrying about your wallet too much. We've got a detailed guide on how to Get Started with Amazon Coins, but if you've already dealt with them in the past, you can buy some more by clicking right here.

  • Arthas's Avatar
    Robot Black Lotus 1265 5754 Posts Joined 03/10/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    A new Common Paladin Spell, Sand Breath, has been revealed!

    Sand Breath Card Image

    Discuss this card below or head on over to the card page to give it a rating!


    Learn more about Descent of Dragons

    Head on over to our dedicated guide for Descent of Dragons!


    Get Cheaper Card Packs

    This section contains affiliate links.

    If you want to save money when buying Hearthstone packs, you should check out Amazon Coins! It's an easy way to save up to 25% off Hearthstone packs so you can get into the new expansion without worrying about your wallet too much. We've got a detailed guide on how to Get Started with Amazon Coins, but if you've already dealt with them in the past, you can buy some more by clicking right here.

    Your friendly neighbourhood bot!
    Like what I'm doing? Disable ads and unlock cosmetics with Out of Cards Premium!

    0
  • Avalon's Avatar
    Salty Dog 1550 2105 Posts Joined 06/12/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    More Dragon synergy Pog

    Spice Lord and self-proclaimed Meme Master.

    • You can follow me on Twitter - I am always active and you can tag me to highlight your (or someone else's) 12 wins Duels run or really anything Hearthstone-related!
    • Hearthstone Battletag: beppe946#2807 (EU)
    -1
  • DoubleSummon's Avatar
    Ancestral Recall 1585 2271 Posts Joined 03/25/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    Divine Strength + divine shield? sounds great... finally a decent dragon synergy card for paladin..

    2
  • CyberBandit's Avatar
    Snow-Covered 180 25 Posts Joined 07/10/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    Why can't they just stay consistent with the way they write the text.

    Why switch "if you're holding a Dragon" to AFTER the effect now?

    Love your work, Blizzard... 🙄

    2
  • Almaniarra's Avatar
    HearthStationeer 1000 1509 Posts Joined 03/21/2019
    Posted 5 years ago
    Quote From CyberBandit

    Why can't they just stay consistent with the way they write the text.

    Why switch "if you're holding a Dragon" to AFTER the effect now?

    Love your work, Blizzard... 🙄

    It just works how the text describes. If you are not holding a dragon it just gives +1/+2 to a minion. If there is a dragon in your hand it also gives divine shield.

    Sorry but there is no inconsistency here.

    Unpopular Opinion Incarnate

    4
  • RandomGuy's Avatar
    430 614 Posts Joined 05/29/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    Even though it's solid, I'm just not sure how useful this effect really is.

    Hand of Protection has never been good. And Divine Strength has never been good.

    In a 30 card deck, I'm not sure this makes the cut. It would have to be a really zoo-y dragon paladin...and even then, I'm suspicious.

     

    1
  • KANSAS's Avatar
    Old God Fanatic 1745 2912 Posts Joined 03/25/2019
    Posted 5 years ago
    Quote From Almaniarra
    Quote From CyberBandit

    Why can't they just stay consistent with the way they write the text.

    Why switch "if you're holding a Dragon" to AFTER the effect now?

    Love your work, Blizzard... 🙄

    It just works how the text describes. If you are not holding a dragon it just gives +1/+2 to a minion. If there is a dragon in your hand it also gives divine shield.

    Sorry but there is no inconsistency here.

    The card will always give a minion +1/+2 whether or not you are holding a dragon. But it will only give divine shield if you are holding a dragon, so I should think it would read "Give a minion +1/+2. If you are holding a dragon, give it Divine Shield" but instead it says "Give a minion +1/+2. Give it divine shield if you are holding a dragon".

    If this card was consistent with other dragon cards it would say 'if you're holding a dragon' before the ability that wants you to be holding a dragon, but this card says 'if you're holding a dragon' after the ability. 

    I am not 100% sure if this is accurate, this is just how I think it should work.

    Carrion, my wayward grub.

    2
  • Almaniarra's Avatar
    HearthStationeer 1000 1509 Posts Joined 03/21/2019
    Posted 5 years ago
    Quote From KANSAS
    Quote From Almaniarra
    Quote From CyberBandit

    Why can't they just stay consistent with the way they write the text.

    Why switch "if you're holding a Dragon" to AFTER the effect now?

    Love your work, Blizzard... 🙄

    It just works how the text describes. If you are not holding a dragon it just gives +1/+2 to a minion. If there is a dragon in your hand it also gives divine shield.

    Sorry but there is no inconsistency here.

    The card will always give a minion +1/+2 whether or not you are holding a dragon. But it will only give divine shield if you are holding a dragon, so I should think it would read "Give a minion +1/+2. If you are holding a dragon, give it Divine Shield" but instead it says "Give a minion +1/+2. Give it divine shield if you are holding a dragon".

    If this card was consistent with other dragon cards it would say 'if you're holding a dragon' before the ability that wants you to be holding a dragon, but this card says 'if you're holding a dragon' after the ability. 

    I am not 100% sure if this is accurate, this is just how I think it should work.

    we'd said same things already. If you look awarely, there is a dot after +1/+2. It basically has 2 effects in 1 spell and "If you're holding a dragon" part is still before the effect which is about holding dragon, that's the divine shield part.

    They taught us "if" sentences as they are same when you say "if I can come home earlier, we might go to the cinema" or "We might go to the cinema if I can come home earlier." So I get it like there is no inconsistency here.

    Unpopular Opinion Incarnate

    0
  • KANSAS's Avatar
    Old God Fanatic 1745 2912 Posts Joined 03/25/2019
    Posted 5 years ago
    Quote From Almaniarra
    Quote From KANSAS
    Quote From Almaniarra
    Quote From CyberBandit

    Why can't they just stay consistent with the way they write the text.

    Why switch "if you're holding a Dragon" to AFTER the effect now?

    Love your work, Blizzard... 🙄

    It just works how the text describes. If you are not holding a dragon it just gives +1/+2 to a minion. If there is a dragon in your hand it also gives divine shield.

    Sorry but there is no inconsistency here.

    The card will always give a minion +1/+2 whether or not you are holding a dragon. But it will only give divine shield if you are holding a dragon, so I should think it would read "Give a minion +1/+2. If you are holding a dragon, give it Divine Shield" but instead it says "Give a minion +1/+2. Give it divine shield if you are holding a dragon".

    If this card was consistent with other dragon cards it would say 'if you're holding a dragon' before the ability that wants you to be holding a dragon, but this card says 'if you're holding a dragon' after the ability. 

    I am not 100% sure if this is accurate, this is just how I think it should work.

    we'd said same things already. If you look awarely, there is a dot after +1/+2. It basically has 2 effects in 1 spell and "If you're holding a dragon" part is still before the effect which is about holding dragon, that's the divine shield part.

    They taught us "if" sentences as they are same when you say "if I can come home earlier, we might go to the cinema" or "We might go to the cinema if I can come home earlier." So I get it like there is no inconsistency here.

    look at cards like Breath of Dreams, Corrosive Breath, Lightning Breath, and Molten Breath. All of them say "do effect X. If your holding a dragon, do effect Y". Sand Breath is the only dragon card in existence that says "if your holding a dragon" at the end of the card.

    You are right in that it is grammatically correct, but it is not consistent with other Hearthstone cards. 

    Carrion, my wayward grub.

    2
  • Almaniarra's Avatar
    HearthStationeer 1000 1509 Posts Joined 03/21/2019
    Posted 5 years ago
    Quote From KANSAS
    Quote From Almaniarra
    Quote From KANSAS
    Quote From Almaniarra
    Quote From CyberBandit

    Why can't they just stay consistent with the way they write the text.

    Why switch "if you're holding a Dragon" to AFTER the effect now?

    Love your work, Blizzard... 🙄

    It just works how the text describes. If you are not holding a dragon it just gives +1/+2 to a minion. If there is a dragon in your hand it also gives divine shield.

    Sorry but there is no inconsistency here.

    The card will always give a minion +1/+2 whether or not you are holding a dragon. But it will only give divine shield if you are holding a dragon, so I should think it would read "Give a minion +1/+2. If you are holding a dragon, give it Divine Shield" but instead it says "Give a minion +1/+2. Give it divine shield if you are holding a dragon".

    If this card was consistent with other dragon cards it would say 'if you're holding a dragon' before the ability that wants you to be holding a dragon, but this card says 'if you're holding a dragon' after the ability. 

    I am not 100% sure if this is accurate, this is just how I think it should work.

    we'd said same things already. If you look awarely, there is a dot after +1/+2. It basically has 2 effects in 1 spell and "If you're holding a dragon" part is still before the effect which is about holding dragon, that's the divine shield part.

    They taught us "if" sentences as they are same when you say "if I can come home earlier, we might go to the cinema" or "We might go to the cinema if I can come home earlier." So I get it like there is no inconsistency here.

    look at cards like Breath of Dreams, Corrosive Breath, Lightning Breath, and Molten Breath. All of them say "do effect X. If your holding a dragon, do effect Y". Sand Breath is the only dragon card in existence that says "if your holding a dragon" at the end of the card.

    You are right in that it is grammatically correct, but it is not consistent with other Hearthstone cards. 

    Still there is not any inconsistency. "if you're holding a dragon, Give it Divine Shield." and "Give it Divine Shield if you are holding a dragon." are same sentences. There is not any ambiguity.

    Unpopular Opinion Incarnate

    -3
  • KANSAS's Avatar
    Old God Fanatic 1745 2912 Posts Joined 03/25/2019
    Posted 5 years ago
    Quote From Almaniarra
    Quote From KANSAS

    look at cards like Breath of Dreams, Corrosive Breath, Lightning Breath, and Molten Breath. All of them say "do effect X. If your holding a dragon, do effect Y". Sand Breath is the only dragon card in existence that says "if your holding a dragon" at the end of the card.

    You are right in that it is grammatically correct, but it is not consistent with other Hearthstone cards. 

    Still there is not any inconsistency. "if you're holding a dragon, Give it Divine Shield." and "Give it Divine Shield if you are holding a dragon." are same sentences. There is not any ambiguity.

    They are both the same sentence, and they both mean the same thing, but the way the sentence is formatted is different than on the other cards, and is therefore, an inconsistency.

    Carrion, my wayward grub.

    0
  • Almaniarra's Avatar
    HearthStationeer 1000 1509 Posts Joined 03/21/2019
    Posted 5 years ago
    Quote From KANSAS
    Quote From Almaniarra
    Quote From KANSAS

    look at cards like Breath of Dreams, Corrosive Breath, Lightning Breath, and Molten Breath. All of them say "do effect X. If your holding a dragon, do effect Y". Sand Breath is the only dragon card in existence that says "if your holding a dragon" at the end of the card.

    You are right in that it is grammatically correct, but it is not consistent with other Hearthstone cards. 

    Still there is not any inconsistency. "if you're holding a dragon, Give it Divine Shield." and "Give it Divine Shield if you are holding a dragon." are same sentences. There is not any ambiguity.

    They are both the same sentence, and they both mean the same thing, but the way the sentence is formatted is different than on the other cards, and is therefore, an inconsistency.

    What you are doing here is finding fault with anything blizzard do. It is just funny how you defend yourself with a meaningless sentence differencies between cards. It is not like the difference between "Adapt 2 times" "adapt, then adapt" or " adapt twice". It is just same sentences in different order, doesn't even mislead people.

    Why are we arguing this? it is just silly.

    Unpopular Opinion Incarnate

    1
  • KANSAS's Avatar
    Old God Fanatic 1745 2912 Posts Joined 03/25/2019
    Posted 5 years ago
    Quote From Almaniarra
    Quote From KANSAS
    Quote From Almaniarra
    Quote From KANSAS

    look at cards like Breath of Dreams, Corrosive Breath, Lightning Breath, and Molten Breath. All of them say "do effect X. If your holding a dragon, do effect Y". Sand Breath is the only dragon card in existence that says "if your holding a dragon" at the end of the card.

    You are right in that it is grammatically correct, but it is not consistent with other Hearthstone cards. 

    Still there is not any inconsistency. "if you're holding a dragon, Give it Divine Shield." and "Give it Divine Shield if you are holding a dragon." are same sentences. There is not any ambiguity.

    They are both the same sentence, and they both mean the same thing, but the way the sentence is formatted is different than on the other cards, and is therefore, an inconsistency.

    What you are doing here is finding fault with anything blizzard do. It is just funny how you defend yourself with a meaningless sentence differencies between cards. It is not like the difference between "Adapt 2 times" "adapt, then adapt" or " adapt twice". It is just same sentences in different order, doesn't even mislead people.

    Why are we arguing this? it is just silly.

    I am not trying to hate on blizzard simply for the sake of hating on blizzard. 

    That one guy mentioned that this card was inconsistent with other dragon cards, and I was just trying to explain why. 

    You are right though that this argument is a little silly. So lets just agree to disagree and end it here.

    Carrion, my wayward grub.

    1
  • Zwane's Avatar
    Wizard 320 423 Posts Joined 06/04/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    I think they wrote it like this so the line breaking was better this way.  The sentence "If you're holding a Dragon"  is so long it would probably end up like 

    Give a minion +1/+2 

    If You're holding a dragon give

    it Divine Shield

    Which would be ugly. I strongly suspect something like this was the reason to use this wording in this case, and they did not want to have two half sentences on one line.

    3
  • ArcanisDF's Avatar
    660 214 Posts Joined 08/01/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    with more dragon sinergy this could be a 3 stars card

    0
  • Joda's Avatar
    HearthStationeer 1020 150 Posts Joined 04/01/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    Arena card i guess?

    Never netdeck, craft Whizbang instead!

    0
  • RavenSunHS's Avatar
    Refreshment Vendor 880 1487 Posts Joined 03/27/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    This card could only be strong in some Dragon Divine Shield Paladin.

    But in a generic Dragonadin, i can only see it as a deck filler, not really relevant.

    0
  • ArngrimUndying's Avatar
    Draconically Dedicated 520 626 Posts Joined 06/11/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    I managed to put together a pretty decent Dragon Paladin deck during RoS and this will slot into very nicely. I think as a class, Paladin is probably the one that has the best "starting position" to build a good Standard Dragon deck relative to the other classes thanks to Dragon Speaker and Bronze Herald - both of which will be in Standard after rotation unlike the Dragon cards for say Hunter (from Witchwood) and Warrior (from Rumble) that will rotate.

    0
  • johnyDI's Avatar
    Island 210 172 Posts Joined 03/31/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    Such effect for so just 1 mana is insane if used in an aggro deck trying to win by turn 6-7. But those decks don't usually play dragons. Dragons are more midrange/control minions, and in those decks this effect is at the very much "meh".

    If we get an aggressive dragon this will be good when you want to dump minions and stats as early as possible.

    0
  • linkblade91's Avatar
    Senior Writer Serra Angel 1720 2904 Posts Joined 02/09/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    Seems fine, but Divine Strength and Hand of Protection aren't exactly good cards. Does combining them and including a Dragon requirement end that problem? Hard to say.

    0
  • Nere's Avatar
    120 67 Posts Joined 07/28/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    It´s not that I hate it or anything, but it seems very boring and I don´t think it´s gonna make the cut. 1/2 divine shield buff isn´t even that great or is it? And you even need to hold a dragon

    0
  • Valord's Avatar
    465 281 Posts Joined 05/28/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    A nice little tempo card for Dragon Paly, seems solid to me.

    0
  • Input's Avatar
    470 259 Posts Joined 06/01/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    The mana reduction from "if you're holding a dragon" is fairly inconsistent. Or am I miscalculating how much mana divine shield is worth?

    0
  • Hedwyn's Avatar
    Draconically Dedicated 325 161 Posts Joined 07/05/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    Seems pretty weak IMO, not because the effect is terrible, but I don't think there's room for this in any deck, even in dragon ones.

    I'm sorry for my bad english :)

    0
  • DelkoHS's Avatar
    Child of Galakrond 485 481 Posts Joined 05/28/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    Hard to rate this card. It's nothing special, but for its cost it does a lot. This expansion does seem to powercreep a lot. This might see play in some Midrange Dragon Paladin decks, but even then it's not a staple probably.

    0
  • frosthearth's Avatar
    655 585 Posts Joined 03/18/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    I have a hunch this expansion will be inclined towards buffing immortal prelates and dragons somehow, so it could be useful.

     
    0
  • thisismyfreebie's Avatar
    100 27 Posts Joined 11/06/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    Maybe this could be used with Prince Liam. I like my Prince. I want to play him.

    0
  • TheOdinson's Avatar
    515 153 Posts Joined 06/04/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    All I know is this seems great to me. Yes, its cheap and doesn't seem super impactful, but Divine Shield is powerful and even a small buff means something, especially on a Divine Shielded minion that can make a favorable trade. I think this will be surprising good.

    To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of the women.

    0
  • xreflex98's Avatar
    Bulbasaur 125 96 Posts Joined 11/21/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    I really like it, looks pretty good. 

    0
  • PipoHs's Avatar
    Vampire 220 142 Posts Joined 11/22/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    for me it´s a filler pack card, not very impressive

    -1
  • Korialstrasz's Avatar
    Supporter 390 81 Posts Joined 03/24/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    This is exactly what a tempo oriented paladin dragon deck is looking for, as it makes for some crazy favourable trades.

    0
  • Koetti's Avatar
    1095 863 Posts Joined 11/21/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    No one's running either Divine Strenght or Hand of Protection, so yeah...

    But maybe there's a place for it in some kind of Highlander-Dragon-Pally?

    0
  • ssaabbuu's Avatar
    225 210 Posts Joined 08/01/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    Cheap spell, good effects & dragon synergies. Looks good depending on the rest of the dragons that come up for Paladin.

    0
  • YourPrivateNightmare's Avatar
    Skeleton 2010 4741 Posts Joined 03/25/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    Have small statbuffs like this ever even seen play? If you don't get at least +2/+2 with an additional upside it's usually not worth it.

    I tried having fun once.

    It was awful.

    0
  • troY's Avatar
    Funnel Cakes 250 271 Posts Joined 11/21/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    I think this is a very underrated card. It's amazing value for its cost. Very good in the early game in Tempo match-ups.

    0
  • allthehype's Avatar
    Crossroads Historian 630 739 Posts Joined 07/26/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    Not impressed. I prefer Secrets and their synergy cards as 1-mana spells in Paladin decks. Can't see wich card I would cut for this.

    0
  • Meteorite12's Avatar
    670 696 Posts Joined 05/29/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    I’m not really convinced it’ll be all that great, multiple effects can be nice, but I don’t feel it’s worth the card slot

    Who needs consistency when you could have fun?

    0
  • theo333's Avatar
    Outlandish Rager 975 889 Posts Joined 03/29/2019
    Posted 5 years ago

    Such a good and infuriating control card. Dragon Paladin is already infuriating enough

    0
  • 8Nikano's Avatar
    155 144 Posts Joined 11/21/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    I thinks its pretty weak overall and can play only in decks with strong dragon synergy

    0
  • Ethardoth's Avatar
    Harpy Lieutenant 435 389 Posts Joined 05/29/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Will be probably hard to spare a slot for this in deck, since its not that impactful, plus it has a condition. When compared to Potion of Heroism, this does not seem much better. Sure, tempo is better, but the deck also has to have enough draw/card gen, which could be problematic to make with Dragons.

    0
  • Horus's Avatar
    Detective Pikachu 2575 3348 Posts Joined 05/29/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    ''Sand Breath'' now that's an insult!

    Struggle with Heroic Galakrond's Awakening? I got your back : 

    0
  • Narfi's Avatar
    175 148 Posts Joined 03/23/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    I don’t like Sandbreath

    0
  • Farfelee's Avatar
    Draconically Dedicated 400 151 Posts Joined 11/21/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    While the card is strong for only 1 mana, I don't see someone wanting to put this in their deck. Playing cheap buffs such as this without a strong card draw spell like Divine Favor will ruin you. Not only that, but you want dragons, unless we get a bunch of strong cheap 1-2 mana dragons (we have Faerie Dragon but it can't be buffed), this won't work. For now, I only see this being played after being discovered by Firetree Witchdoctor.

    More dragons? Yes please!

    0
  • liontail's Avatar
    Draconically Dedicated 210 277 Posts Joined 09/04/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Buff and divine shield..easily activated in a dragon deck..this will be a staple card in the dragon meta.

    0
  • Alex13c's Avatar
    Squirtle 140 34 Posts Joined 05/31/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    I think the other breaths are a lot more powerful because they don’t have as much dragon synergy

    0
  • Meneldor's Avatar
    Child of Galakrond 375 204 Posts Joined 07/26/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Really disappointed with this card. All the other "breath" cards are crazy good and this is .... fine??? Expected much more

    0
  • KinetiClasH's Avatar
    135 87 Posts Joined 09/05/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    2 cards in one although i see it more in an aggro type of Dragon Paladin, we'll have to see how  it unfold, in paper good, in reality....an incognita

    0
  • vprr's Avatar
    Face Collector 560 209 Posts Joined 03/31/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Nice cheap effective buff card for Paladin.

    I can see this card being very powerful in Arena, however for standard I really cannot see this making the cut. It is simply too 'fair' of a card. Unless the meta goes full midrange where value trades matter, this card will not see play.

    0
  • Juan73908's Avatar
    Magma Rager 290 157 Posts Joined 11/28/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Good and balanced. Won't win any game but seems fun to use. Also combine the effects of 2 cards that were not used much in one.

    0
  • Freforos's Avatar
    Draconically Dedicated 330 320 Posts Joined 11/21/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    I found this card pretty good. 

    If dragon pala would be a thing it will probably run 2 of these, especially if will go on midrangey direction.

    In the right situation is ok to play this card even if you still not have any dragon in hand and not feel too bad about it.

    0
  • IlBelTia's Avatar
    Wizard 440 333 Posts Joined 06/01/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Too undertone to fit the dragon theme IMHO.

    0
  • Alucard3598's Avatar
    125 38 Posts Joined 06/03/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    A decent buff pay-off for Dragon paladin decks, which traditionally have lacked good pay-off cards.
    Also a cheap buff in general for decks that care about cheap spells.

    0
  • Svintusevich's Avatar
    Draconically Dedicated 185 153 Posts Joined 05/28/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    I might see some play in agressive paladin but i don't very like the card. Yeah paladin should be able to buff things but this card is too boring IMO. I feel like it's just a filler card.

    0
  • padoru's Avatar
    Explorer of Outland 180 154 Posts Joined 12/02/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    these early buffs are really good with secretkeeper, zealot, etc that scale from early game, but the dragon requirement kinda limits that. i dont think any dragon deck wants to run this.

    0
  • DarkFrostX's Avatar
    Old God Fanatic 830 1229 Posts Joined 07/26/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    I don't like it, but I have a problem in low impact cards so maybe it's just me.

    0
  • Guenh's Avatar
    Devoted Academic 725 633 Posts Joined 05/28/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    I think it's a cheap strong spell IF we trigger both effect. Without the Divine Shild I think it's not worty to play

    0
  • TheWanderer's Avatar
    Funnel Cakes 200 157 Posts Joined 09/09/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    It seems like 30% of every card in this expansion is going to have a dragon trigger on it....

    0
  • meisterz39's Avatar
    925 1200 Posts Joined 06/03/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    With the dragon synergy for divine shield, this card could be relevant for board control at any point in the game. Pretty solid, but Buff Paladin isn't as well supported as it used to be. Could make for some fun Galvadon Paladin in wild.

    0
  • b4timert's Avatar
    165 151 Posts Joined 11/05/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    better than card that never saw play but i think its still not good enough

    0
  • MenacingBagel's Avatar
    Zombie Chow 815 723 Posts Joined 09/24/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Might work but I feel like it's going to go in the bin its like hand of protection (I think) but adds stats I could see this but I feel like its too lacking

    Self proclaimed good at battlegrounds

    0
  • Haffax733's Avatar
    Devoted Outlander 1035 297 Posts Joined 04/02/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    It looks like Dragon Paladin finally gets enough support to make a card like this work. However, this card might not fit into a dragon deck since the effect is rather small. Maybe, this cards finds it's way into an Aggor Paladin that also runs Faerie Dragon.

    0
  • Mahobear8's Avatar
    355 284 Posts Joined 03/22/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Might see play in no Neutral Paladin as a filler

    0
  • Doublebuttered's Avatar
    145 140 Posts Joined 12/05/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    I feel like paladin has had a ton of great dragon synergy cards already, they just lacked actual dragons. This expansion might push it over the edge.

    0
  • magikman's Avatar
    285 152 Posts Joined 06/17/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Kinda awkward, very incremental buff. Even the addition of Divine Shield probably isn’t enough to make it worthwhile.

    Jaina is best waifu. Always.

    0
  • leitong's Avatar
    220 147 Posts Joined 03/25/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Good dragon deck supporting card due to being 2 cards in 1. Good in early games, but the value falls off quickly.

    0
  • CuakOn's Avatar
    1070 296 Posts Joined 11/21/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    A nice addition to a dragon paladin deck. You can use it early game or late game.  

    0
  • JFK's Avatar
    Curious Pair 1070 621 Posts Joined 07/31/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    Probably just too small and too irrelevant to see play. Wish I could say otherwise.

    0
  • Torgal's Avatar
    Draconically Dedicated 1000 293 Posts Joined 06/01/2019
    Posted 4 years, 11 months ago

    For given cost good value, but for standard its too balanced.  I don't believe this will make it to the meta.

    Fun and interactive game.

    0
  • Leave a Comment

    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign in here.