All Comments

Maybe post a pic? try doing that on reddit, and perhaps your problem might get noticed by devs.

I got my dust, and its still showing 400 to create and disenchant for me.

Also for the "offhand weapon penalty" if we're doing two attacks a turn, i would consider the ogre mechanic of 50% chance of a miss, rather than decreasing damage. It is held in your less dominant hand afterall.

All good points! And yes i meant to say when you attack with both weapons both lose durability, in my example above, you would lose one 3/1 axe, and the other one would becom a 3/1, but it would shift to your main hand to free up use of the hero power again.

When it comes to attacking i really do favor one attack a turn still, even though i know it would make more sense for it to be double attack, because a lot of warrior weapons are flavored to have multiple attacks(Sul'thraze Fool's Bane), or are balanced around the one attack a turn mechanic(Livewire Lance Brass Knuckles Wrenchcalibur Woecleaver) with wording that says "Whener your hero attacks" or "after your hero attacks" I figured it would be easier to not have to change the wording on those cards to fit the mechanic.

In regards to pirate warrior, granted it was an oversight on my part, but isn't the synergy related to anchar? and pirate synergy not just weapons? Sure the deck has weapons in it, i won't deny, but i don't think it would be a major problem, When you're being hit with an [Hearthstone Card (archanite reaper) Not Found], i don't think it would matter, if it was on that turn or the turn after.

Also i think [Hearthstone Card (upgrade) Not Found] should benefit both weapons as well, when i was thinking about it i was worried about something like Doctor Krastinov could see a bit of an issue, but i don't think it would live past a 1/1 buff. The card i am REALLY worried about for this would be Hoard Pillager, i threw out pirate warrior before, but i think with hoard pillager being a pirate, and it EQUIPPING a destroyed weapon, it would be an issue going forward.

Anub'arak?

Is it Leper Gnome? Or something similar like Backstreet Leper or Kobold Sandtrooper?

It seemed to me like they were trying to hide the best info behind a pay gate when I was last there. Money grab, most likely. 

It's ok though. I never really paid much attention to them anyways. No big loss for me. I kinda preferred LoR Guardian already, so I'll use that. 

Battlegrounds is obviously designed, like most games, to have higher stakes and more damage later in the game. But I do think that there is too much damage right now. Any time I get a good Elemental board, I am able to consistently deal 16-24 damage every round. And when you only have 40 life, that is just too much damage to be taking at once. I think this is mainly due to Crackling Cyclone which is able to kill 2-4 minions by itself, and Wildfire Elemental which is able to kill 2-3 minions in one attack. Because these two minions are able to kill so many minions by themselves, games usually end faster, and with less attacks on your part then normal. So when the match is over 60% of your board will still be in tact, which lets you deal unnaturally high amounts of damage.

In addition to that Elementals tend to have so many stats that nothing would die anyways no matter how long the games went on.

Stronk

That's what I first thought too. Also it looks cool but it would probably never see constructed play.

Kayn Sunfury?

It is still offering full dust for me, so it should be working as normal.

I’ve seen worse Taunt cards.

Bomb Warrior? I don’t think so.

Quote From kaladin

I don't really like the new meta.  It feels extremely highroll-y.  You might be doing fine, but then come turn 8 you take 30 damage and get last.

That's, in my opinion, how it should be.

Basically you start taking real damage around turn 6, so there's more than enough time to settle on a build and see if rng contents to give you the right minions to survive to the last 4. Reducing the damage output will mean games lasting longer, and while that means most of the losing half of players get to stay on longer, it'll soon get tedious. Not going to lie, the only reason I still played battlegrounds at all is because games tend to only be 20-30 minutes long. Any longer and that's it for me, and I suspect that to be the same for most casual players too.

Do you mean the links to the cards or the images in the guide?

The nerfs were only two days ago, but I can't disenchant Guardian Animals for 400 dust. Have I missed something?

If you are not playing in ranked then you probably don't really care about the 1k portraits anyway. You will always win games, even if lose a lot your MMR will drop until you face players more your skill level.

Thanks for the decklist summary! :D I'm surprised Warlock is favored over Paladin, did not see that coming 

The idea is workable, but consistent cards like these often get cancerous quickly.

Best thing to do is to simply reduce the number of weapons needed to 4, and make it a battlecry. If that makes it too weak, then perhaps it should also have 'draw this at the start of the game', but with reduced stats. So to fit this juggernaut of a card, that deck would need to play a weakened card on curve, and still need to draw those weapons to be effective. In this way, its not an auto include into hyper aggro decks, but remains a viable card for tempo aggro, or even midrange.

Also, I agree with the other commenters that what a duo weapon should be doing is allowing double swing. I would also add that cards like Upgrade! should upgrade both weapons at once. The swing would happen first on the main, then on the secondary weapon, so its matters which weapon you equip first.

The Guardian Animals nerf hit Druid hard. The class is now 9th place on HSReplay, and I'm sure both Malygos and Pure Guardian Animals archetypes suffered. My prediction is less people will bring Druid, and will stick to safer classes. Might even seen a rise in Paladin