Great! Couldnt get twitch prime because of being in Argentina and just not being able to join at the time. I dont care about the cardbacks but tyrande is just perfect 4 priest
You are right in that it is grammatically correct, but it is not consistent with other Hearthstone cards.
Still there is not any inconsistency. "if you're holding a dragon, Give it Divine Shield." and "Give it Divine Shield if you are holding a dragon." are same sentences. There is not any ambiguity.
They are both the same sentence, and they both mean the same thing, but the way the sentence is formatted is different than on the other cards, and is therefore, an inconsistency.
Why can't they just stay consistent with the way they write the text.
Why switch "if you're holding a Dragon" to AFTER the effect now?
Love your work, Blizzard... 🙄
It just works how the text describes. If you are not holding a dragon it just gives +1/+2 to a minion. If there is a dragon in your hand it also gives divine shield.
Sorry but there is no inconsistency here.
The card will always give a minion +1/+2 whether or not you are holding a dragon. But it will only give divine shield if you are holding a dragon, so I should think it would read "Give a minion +1/+2. If you are holding a dragon, give it Divine Shield" but instead it says "Give a minion +1/+2. Give it divine shield if you are holding a dragon".
If this card was consistent with other dragon cards it would say 'if you're holding a dragon' before the ability that wants you to be holding a dragon, but this card says 'if you're holding a dragon' after the ability.
I am not 100% sure if this is accurate, this is just how I think it should work.
we'd said same things already. If you look awarely, there is a dot after +1/+2. It basically has 2 effects in 1 spell and "If you're holding a dragon" part is still before the effect which is about holding dragon, that's the divine shield part.
They taught us "if" sentences as they are same when you say "if I can come home earlier, we might go to the cinema" or "We might go to the cinema if I can come home earlier." So I get it like there is no inconsistency here.
You are right in that it is grammatically correct, but it is not consistent with other Hearthstone cards.
Still there is not any inconsistency. "if you're holding a dragon, Give it Divine Shield." and "Give it Divine Shield if you are holding a dragon." are same sentences. There is not any ambiguity.
Why can't they just stay consistent with the way they write the text.
Why switch "if you're holding a Dragon" to AFTER the effect now?
Love your work, Blizzard... 🙄
It just works how the text describes. If you are not holding a dragon it just gives +1/+2 to a minion. If there is a dragon in your hand it also gives divine shield.
Sorry but there is no inconsistency here.
The card will always give a minion +1/+2 whether or not you are holding a dragon. But it will only give divine shield if you are holding a dragon, so I should think it would read "Give a minion +1/+2. If you are holding a dragon, give it Divine Shield" but instead it says "Give a minion +1/+2. Give it divine shield if you are holding a dragon".
If this card was consistent with other dragon cards it would say 'if you're holding a dragon' before the ability that wants you to be holding a dragon, but this card says 'if you're holding a dragon' after the ability.
I am not 100% sure if this is accurate, this is just how I think it should work.
we'd said same things already. If you look awarely, there is a dot after +1/+2. It basically has 2 effects in 1 spell and "If you're holding a dragon" part is still before the effect which is about holding dragon, that's the divine shield part.
They taught us "if" sentences as they are same when you say "if I can come home earlier, we might go to the cinema" or "We might go to the cinema if I can come home earlier." So I get it like there is no inconsistency here.
Why can't they just stay consistent with the way they write the text.
Why switch "if you're holding a Dragon" to AFTER the effect now?
Love your work, Blizzard... 🙄
It just works how the text describes. If you are not holding a dragon it just gives +1/+2 to a minion. If there is a dragon in your hand it also gives divine shield.
Sorry but there is no inconsistency here.
The card will always give a minion +1/+2 whether or not you are holding a dragon. But it will only give divine shield if you are holding a dragon, so I should think it would read "Give a minion +1/+2. If you are holding a dragon, give it Divine Shield" but instead it says "Give a minion +1/+2. Give it divine shield if you are holding a dragon".
If this card was consistent with other dragon cards it would say 'if you're holding a dragon' before the ability that wants you to be holding a dragon, but this card says 'if you're holding a dragon' after the ability.
I am not 100% sure if this is accurate, this is just how I think it should work.
we'd said same things already. If you look awarely, there is a dot after +1/+2. It basically has 2 effects in 1 spell and "If you're holding a dragon" part is still before the effect which is about holding dragon, that's the divine shield part.
They taught us "if" sentences as they are same when you say "if I can come home earlier, we might go to the cinema" or "We might go to the cinema if I can come home earlier." So I get it like there is no inconsistency here.
This busted body on a 1-drop is exactly how hunter answers early boards without losing bodies to it (looking at you, Springpaw, you wonderful cat, you)
Solid spell that fits perfectly into aggressive decks and slower builds alike. The dragon synergy will decide if this is worth it based on how well hunter can manage with dragons as a build around
Excellent card, and glad it's not beast because this would be busted good if it were beast tribe and not dragon. Poisonous and battlecry without conditions? Sign me up for the value train.
eh, I hope I'm surprised but I don't expect much from this in standard, at least not until rotation in April. We still have about 115 or so cards to go, so maybe this has some merit
Tyrande Returns This Year for Free
Great! Couldnt get twitch prime because of being in Argentina and just not being able to join at the time. I dont care about the cardbacks but tyrande is just perfect 4 priest
Tyrande Returns This Year for Free
Yeah, the only skin I am missing!
Honest Hearthstone Cards (Game)
Next up:
Tyrande Returns This Year for Free
Elune give me strength!
Tyrande Returns This Year for Free
Nice, I hate Anduin and Madame Lazul
BlizzCon 2019 Recap - Everything You Need to Know
After the pre-expansion update tomorrow!
Tyrande Returns This Year for Free
Unlikely, since "giving it away free" doesn't usually mean forcing people to spend money on it.
Tyrande Returns This Year for Free
Glad to here it, but I’d rather see Khadgar this year seeing as he fits into the story of this year.
Tyrande Returns This Year for Free
I think it’s
”My dear Malfurion.”
”My beloved Tyrande.”
Tyrande Returns This Year for Free
Yesssss! I've been asking for them to bring her back for a long time now.
New Paladin Spell - Sand Breath
They are both the same sentence, and they both mean the same thing, but the way the sentence is formatted is different than on the other cards, and is therefore, an inconsistency.
New Paladin Spell - Sand Breath
Still there is not any inconsistency. "if you're holding a dragon, Give it Divine Shield." and "Give it Divine Shield if you are holding a dragon." are same sentences. There is not any ambiguity.
Tyrande Returns This Year for Free
oh I hope so. I need a cool mage portrait.
New Paladin Spell - Sand Breath
look at cards like Breath of Dreams, Corrosive Breath, Lightning Breath, and Molten Breath. All of them say "do effect X. If your holding a dragon, do effect Y". Sand Breath is the only dragon card in existence that says "if your holding a dragon" at the end of the card.
You are right in that it is grammatically correct, but it is not consistent with other Hearthstone cards.
Tyrande Returns This Year for Free
And what about Khadgar???
Tyrande Returns This Year for Free
Yes, My Dear Tyrande and My something something Malfurion.
New Paladin Spell - Sand Breath
we'd said same things already. If you look awarely, there is a dot after +1/+2. It basically has 2 effects in 1 spell and "If you're holding a dragon" part is still before the effect which is about holding dragon, that's the divine shield part.
They taught us "if" sentences as they are same when you say "if I can come home earlier, we might go to the cinema" or "We might go to the cinema if I can come home earlier." So I get it like there is no inconsistency here.
Tyrande Returns This Year for Free
Doesnt she have a special greeting when facing Malfurion? I dont have her but i thjnk i saw it somewhere
Phase Stalker
I think the wild players have more to look forward to in December than standard, but we'll see what else is revealed
Dwarven Sharpshooter
I'm onboard for this card 100%.
This busted body on a 1-drop is exactly how hunter answers early boards without losing bodies to it (looking at you, Springpaw, you wonderful cat, you)
Corrosive Breath
Solid spell that fits perfectly into aggressive decks and slower builds alike. The dragon synergy will decide if this is worth it based on how well hunter can manage with dragons as a build around
Toxic Reinforcements
Dragonblight synergy with the sidequest is interesting, but we'll see how viable this is. Seems fine even standalone; hunter loves to go face
Primordial Explorer
Excellent card, and glad it's not beast because this would be busted good if it were beast tribe and not dragon. Poisonous and battlecry without conditions? Sign me up for the value train.
Dragonbane
eh, I hope I'm surprised but I don't expect much from this in standard, at least not until rotation in April. We still have about 115 or so cards to go, so maybe this has some merit
Tyrande Returns This Year for Free
This is great!
I don't play priest, but any free stuff is always welcome.