dapperdog

5 stars for the minion, 2 stars because its a druid minion. Its sad, because on its own the card is fundamentally sound, in fact its great. But trapped in a class that currently only plays either hyper aggro or …

[card]archivist elysiana[/card] has only ever been viable because [card]dr. boom, mad genius[/card] was broken, and the only way to win the mirrors was just this card. On its own merits elysiana has never truly been good, because it costed 8 …

That [card]magister dawngrasp[/card] interaction you mentioned has a double edge. You do discover two cards but you draw only one. Meaning unless you've draw options, you're really just 50-50 your choice of cards each turn, getting worse as the game …

Good point. I still think its okay, because its basically like warrior's bombs, and honestly would warlock save up 3 cards just to pull it off with tamsin, and then there's the rng factor because its your opponent who needs …

Damn, that makes the card even better than I thought.

Thanks for the note

At least it deals your opponent's fatigue damage. So in most cases its just 6 damage. Its no garrote that's for sure.

Does it discover treasures? I think it replaces the deck with random treasures.

If you play while your deck only contain dragons, it replaces your deck with treasures from duels. That's what I get from kibler's video.

Strong yes, but impractical, unless you prestor on 6, or...somehow play a no minion deck...hmmmm

More new cards :)

- [card]stormwind avenger[/card] is a soft taunt. Play it on 3 and your opponent will do everything they can to remove it. In libram pally its just absurd amounts of damage...in theory. In reality, it'll …

Alright, new cards :)

- [card]Boomkin[/card] is another one of those cards which in theory is incredibly strong in other classes, but stuck in a class like druid its now a middling meh. Its certainly not bad, doing 4 …

It could be a display bug. I think I saw this from reddit somewhere. You will still take damage its just that its showing the immune animation while you're attacking.

I haven't seen this myself to be honest, having …

Quote From h0lysatan

Quote From dapperdog

Is there any hope? Yes. Big spell mage would love more AoE thats smaller than [card]flamestrike[/card],

I hope this is sarcasm, because if you played it with …

Shaman always had problems clearing boards in the early game, and this card fills that gap so well, while not destroying your board to boot.

But the reason why this card would probably see more play than just quest …

Right now, its bless priest, paladin or nothing.

Outside of that I'd rate [card]loot hoarder[/card] over it. The honor kill will only ever proct because your opponent's an idiot, or you can strategically buff the attack to fit using …

Arena filler. Or Duels fodder. Basically its never going to see play in standard.

Even on its own merits, its still needs a dragon activator, so in addition to having to actually put this in your deck, it needs …

The only reason why this card isn't taking home 5 stars from me is that its 100% only ever going to be played in a heavy, control oriented warrior.

But honestly, this is about as good as it can …

Its not that great to be honest. Dealing 3 for 4 mana is no longer as powerful as it used to be, even with that 4/4 body. Also, this card is infinitely less consistent than [card]duskbreaker[/card], the real reason why …

The only thing taking this card down is its cost. [card]Fire sale[/card] by comparison burns the entire board, and comes out a turn earlier. This card has the potential to do more, but your opponent would wisely play around this, …

Its a 6/6 for 5, with a nice tempo swing coming with it.

But it has a terrible downside - the battlecry kills randomly, and more crucially, it discards a card from your hand, which in most decks that's …

It requires you to hold on to these spells, and this being a situational card makes it a big problem. Against a fast deck, you'd might be forced to not play your [card]thrive in the shadows[/card] or [card]palm reading[/card] on …