"It's called Bondage Warrior because it's built around whipping all your minions."
Just a slight technicality here, but bondage actually just simply refers to the act of being restrained. Whipping by itself does not classify as bondage. Instead it's probably along the lines of sadomasochism. Although both are part of BDSM, they are two entirely separate things.
How I know this is not important, so don't go wondering.
EDIT: This also happened to be my 69th post. How fitting.
After you log in, you will occasionally be transported to a random card page. I just logged in, and was then taken to the page for Soot Up despite having never visited that page before.
Rogue is gonna get a bad quest. After caverns below they can’t give rogue a halfway decent one sadly.
wish they would bring stealth back to rogue in some way.
Would like a play X combo cards hero power becomes give a minion stealth but I doubt that would be grea
It's funny because this is exactly what people said about The Caverns Below before Un'Goro was launched. I remember one person even said that if Crystal Core was a collectable card, it still wouldn't see play. Of course, this is obviously horribly wrong.
After Dr. Boom, Mysterious Challenger, The Caverns Below, Prince Keleseth, Possessed Lackey, Genn and Baku, you learn that you can't trust anyone's opinions of cards pre-release. Not even your own. Cards look "interesting" or "fun to try out", but we never know if they're actually good or bad until release.
I'm not a big Arena player, but if I may, it feels a bit strange for 1 to the highest rating, and 5 to be the lowest. In most cases, you expect the other way around.
Also here for the Mage thing. Whilst Reno would also fit Paladin because of the healing, the only class Finley could go to is Paladin because of Murloc synergy, thus Reno can only go to Mage since Druid is already taken by Elise, and Hunter is (presumably) taken by Brann. There's also the evidence of the artwork and the crystal gun.
I don't think Blizzard is going to use the whole "Reno is a dragon" thing here. It was a stupid theory to begin with.
I am seriously getting so god damned sick and tired of these types of comments.
You're just projecting.
Just because you're immature and can't see a woman body without obsessing over it sexually and without getting a '' raging boner '' doesn't mean that other people can't...
A fully grown adult in particular should be capable of seeing a womans body without reacting that way, even most teenager high on hormones can.
I am getting so tired of well-meaning but extremely condescending men in particular with the '' overly-concerned and protective father syndrome '' who think that they need to protect women from themselves and that they're being '' woke '' for modesty policing women ( while being totally okay with half-naked men. I can't even begin to count how many times I've seen men post pictures of themselves shirtless in the mirror, and then shame women for wearing normal clothes that show cleavage.
I have to deal with this all the god damned time as a woman and I am getting so tired of it.
And if you can't see a womans body without getting a hard on then you have some issues that you need to work on, if anything you're just outing yourself without even realizing it with your comment.
A healthy adult man doesn't have that reaction to it...
The human body is beautiful, and I think that we all like seeing them.
If we can look at mens bodies without going '' hurr durr unzip pants fap material '' then we should be able to look at womens bodies in the same way. You can appreciate art like the Succubus without it being '' for fap material ''.
It's just such an immature and puritanical way of looking at it...
And there are a lot of cards with far more revealing male characters.
And cards like freaking Succubuses or even the Harpies who are basically beasts are the last card that should be censored...
If skin being revealed doesn't make sense then, when does it make sense and why ain't those same standards applied to men?
Tbh, Malfurion is pretty damn hot. There are many half-naked hot men in Warcraft... Should they be censored because I find them attractive?
Absolutely agree with this. As a straight male, all of the posts I see about "missing boobs, game is ruined" is really, really stupid. Boobs do not define the game, the game defines the game. People who say that they're going to "miss the boobs" or whatever are just making themselves look stupid and immature. Even if they're joking, this stuff really does affect people.
To put it lightly, the world is an unfair bastard.
I'm not sure the reward is good enough. Also, I wonder if this works with the Coin.
The Coin works very weirdly.
I don't know if this still applies or not, but using The Coin on turn 9 to activate Omega cards didn't work at one point because it wasn't "the same type of Mana" or some sort of BS like that.
They literally removed Succubus as a card and replace it with a random demon. LMAO
And Headcrack looks like hot garbage now. Come on, Blizzard
Felstalker is the same card as Succubus, but with "less offensive art" (?) At least until someone starts finding Felstalkers sexual! And the Felstalker pet for Warlocks in WoW is a pretty classic thing related to that class. Similar to Voidwalker.
With that in mind, I get why they changed it to Felstalker, but I'm still a little unsure of why it had to be changed so much instead of just updating the card art. Also, I'm confused by Mistress of Pain being changed to Queen of Pain. Is "mistress" a bad word in some parts of the world?
From what I understand, "mistress" sounds a bit too "BDSM-ish", although I thought that was supposed to be the point. You know, with the whip and everything?
Hilariously, now that they changed the name, they will need to change the flavor text as well, because it made a joke relating to the name.
I half-understand changing the oversexualized female characters (although I don't think anyone was offended by this), but removing the blood is a bit strange.
Even without Vanish, Rogue still has an AoE effect (Fan of Knives), so it's still important to have one even if it's an intended weakness for the class.
It is better but not strictly better since Hammer of Wrath can target face whereas Sand Attack cannot. Hammer of Wrath is not a very good card to begin with, so I thought making it 3 mana with the minions-only restriction was fair.
I don't know if it's a bug but it's weird, when I try to leave a comment small letter 'p' appears on the bottom of a text editor. Wish they removed it.
That's intentional. It's just a display of the text's code. For example, if you have bold told, it will appear as "p » strong". Changing the size, style, color, adding an image, etc, will use different code.
The "p" presumably standard for "Paragraph" as that is the default text option. Changing it to Heading 2 will display it as "h2".
"It's called Bondage Warrior because it's built around whipping all your minions."
Just a slight technicality here, but bondage actually just simply refers to the act of being restrained. Whipping by itself does not classify as bondage. Instead it's probably along the lines of sadomasochism. Although both are part of BDSM, they are two entirely separate things.
How I know this is not important, so don't go wondering.
EDIT: This also happened to be my 69th post. How fitting.
They just added Poisonous to the Basic set (Plaguebringer). I guess that means they could theoretically add Rush too.
After you log in, you will occasionally be transported to a random card page. I just logged in, and was then taken to the page for Soot Up despite having never visited that page before.
It's funny because this is exactly what people said about The Caverns Below before Un'Goro was launched. I remember one person even said that if Crystal Core was a collectable card, it still wouldn't see play. Of course, this is obviously horribly wrong.
After Dr. Boom, Mysterious Challenger, The Caverns Below, Prince Keleseth, Possessed Lackey, Genn and Baku, you learn that you can't trust anyone's opinions of cards pre-release. Not even your own. Cards look "interesting" or "fun to try out", but we never know if they're actually good or bad until release.
I'm not a big Arena player, but if I may, it feels a bit strange for 1 to the highest rating, and 5 to be the lowest. In most cases, you expect the other way around.
Also here for the Mage thing. Whilst Reno would also fit Paladin because of the healing, the only class Finley could go to is Paladin because of Murloc synergy, thus Reno can only go to Mage since Druid is already taken by Elise, and Hunter is (presumably) taken by Brann. There's also the evidence of the artwork and the crystal gun.
I don't think Blizzard is going to use the whole "Reno is a dragon" thing here. It was a stupid theory to begin with.
Absolutely agree with this. As a straight male, all of the posts I see about "missing boobs, game is ruined" is really, really stupid. Boobs do not define the game, the game defines the game. People who say that they're going to "miss the boobs" or whatever are just making themselves look stupid and immature. Even if they're joking, this stuff really does affect people.
To put it lightly, the world is an unfair bastard.
The Coin works very weirdly.
I don't know if this still applies or not, but using The Coin on turn 9 to activate Omega cards didn't work at one point because it wasn't "the same type of Mana" or some sort of BS like that.
From what I understand, "mistress" sounds a bit too "BDSM-ish", although I thought that was supposed to be the point. You know, with the whip and everything?
Hilariously, now that they changed the name, they will need to change the flavor text as well, because it made a joke relating to the name.
Jar Dealer
Saviors of Uldum card revealed today.
Whole thing for reference, stolen from Reddit.
I half-understand changing the oversexualized female characters (although I don't think anyone was offended by this), but removing the blood is a bit strange.
It's a Priest card.
I half expected the singer to say "I need a hero" in the midst of the song.
Electrowright
A card almost no person knows/remembers.
Updated to include Plaguebringer and Radiance.
Even without Vanish, Rogue still has an AoE effect (Fan of Knives), so it's still important to have one even if it's an intended weakness for the class.
It is better but not strictly better since Hammer of Wrath can target face whereas Sand Attack cannot. Hammer of Wrath is not a very good card to begin with, so I thought making it 3 mana with the minions-only restriction was fair.
That's intentional. It's just a display of the text's code. For example, if you have bold told, it will appear as "p » strong". Changing the size, style, color, adding an image, etc, will use different code.
The "p" presumably standard for "Paragraph" as that is the default text option. Changing it to Heading 2 will display it as "h2".
Prince Valanar
Gains a keyword under a condition.
Zul'jin
10 mana class card.