Nathan "ThatsAdmirable" Zamora stated he will be joining Brian Kibler and no longer be casting the Hearthstone Grandmasters at BlizzCon or going forward. Admirable has also pulled out of casting Masters Bucharest.
On the other side of things, Simon "Sottle" Welch has announced that he will be casting Grandmasters stating he does not need to agree with the actions or policies of his employer, and he will neither support or condone them.
Note: It is okay to not agree with Sottle, or even Admirable, for their different views. It is, however, not okay for personal attacks against either person.
ThatsAdmirable No Longer Casting
Quote From Nathan Zamora For half a decade, I have sought to bring passion and joy to a community that shares my love for Hearthstone and card games. The thirst for competition, the desire for drama, and the conquest for glory. It's lead me down paths I could not have fathomed as a young man playing games. During that half decade, I've worked to uphold Blizzard's foundational, core values - particularly Every Voice Matters. However, in light of recent events regarding Blitzchung, it is with a heavy hearth that I must say this:
I will not be a part of the broadcast team for Hearthstone for the remainder of the Grandmasters season, for the Masters Tour in Bucharest, or for BlizzCon.
Blitzchung's actions to support Hong Kong speak to me far more than I could have imagined. It takes courage to stand up for what you believe in, and to make sacrifices in the process. His actions are inspiring to me, and I support him wholeheartedly.
Brian Kibler released a statement that pretty much hits the nail on the head. It's hard to add much more to this, and I agree with Brian's stance on this matter.
In Brian's closing thoughts, he says:
However, I want to make clear that not everyone involved in GM has this luxury. Do not take your anger out on the other casters, or streamers, or employees of Blizzard. This is not the kind of decision that comes from the rank and file. Most likely they’re just as angry as you are. I know I am.
He's not wrong. For me, this is a large part of my livelihood. This is my passion. This pursuit has been my life, and I'm lucky that I've been able to make it a career. But I cannot compromise my conviction. Without change that would convince me that Blizzard will uphold their core value "Every Voice Matters," I cannot continue casting the game.
Hearthstone and games have taught me a lot of valuable lessons. And so, in summary, here's how I can best describe it:
In Hearthstone, good strategic play involves making the right choice, even if that choice will sometimes cost you. You think about the range of possibilities from the other side. With the hand you're dealt, you make the best choice you can, even if the foreseeable outcomes hurt. That doesn't mean you should make worse choices - it means do the right thing, even if you pay the price.
Sottle Continues to Cast
Quote From Simon Welch As most of you likely know, last week APAC Grandmaster Blitzchung was disqualified from Grandmasters and had his prize money stripped away due to a rules violation regarding political speech.
I fully support Blitzchung's right to protest and have immense sympathy for his cause and for the plight of the Hong Kong people. What he did was incredibly brave and my heart goes out to him and everyone else fighting for Democracy.
However, in light of the recent relevations that one or more casters will be stepping away from Hearthstone, I would like to affirm that I fully intend to fulfill my contracts with Hearthstone Esports and am open to work with them in the future.
I do not have to agree with the actions or policies of any employer, partner, or service to continue to be affiliated with them. My views are my own, and remain unchanged and uninfluenced by this decision or by Blizzard or Hearthstone Esport's actions.
I love Hearthstone, and I love what I do. I choose to continue not to support or condone these actions, but to support an incredible game and an incredible team at the ground level who work to put on tournaments and productions that I love being a part of.
It is important to me that I as an individual can disagree with decisions that are made by Hearthstone Esports or Blizzard and that our relationship can continue unaffected. This is why I felt it was important to make this statement and I hope and expect that they can grant me that courtesy
American University Team Forfeits Games
We had previously reported on the American University collegiate Hearthstone team had held up a sign stating "Free Hong Kong, Boycott Blizzard". The team has decided to forfeit the rest of their matches because Blizzard did not penalize them for their actions, calling Blizzard hypocritical.
Quote From Rod Breslau Blizzard/TeSPA has decided not to penalize American University for holding up their sign and has scheduled their next match, but AU has decided to forfeit the match and the season, saying it is hypocritical for Blizzard to punish blitzchung but not them
Comments
It was written by China. A user on Twitter details all the ways that a nonnative speaker uses English in slightly odd ways.
https://twitter.com/sgbluebell/status/1182817588147052544
Seriously, read this guy's analysis of it. China wrote the apology. Blizzard is ever more lost to us than we realized. Blizzcon is going to be full or Pooh protests, Chinese flags, and all the forums will be "next question."
If nothing else, I take an immense amount of schadenfreude from the fact that the stated reason for banning Blitzchung ("distracting people from the game") has backfired spectacularly, and now the twitch chat in GM is just wall-to-wall political commentary.
Mr. Toast has something to say:
https://twitter.com/DisguisedToast/status/1182464793946415104?s=09
Generally the statement from Sottle and from the other casters Raven and Darroch seem on the whole fair and reasonable when looked at individually. The thing that bothers me is their similarity to each other:
Sottle: "I would like to affirm that I fully intend to fulfill my contracts with Hearthstone Esports and am open to work with them in the future."
Raven: "I will continue to fulfill my ongoing contracts with the Hearthstone team [...] and will look to continue to work with them in future."
Darroch: "I plan on fulfilling my current obligations and continuing to cast Hearthstone in the future."
If you look at each statement, they effectively the same message beat for beat.
Another example - soft disagreement with Blizzard's actions but commitment to stay on.
Sottle: "I do not have to agree with the actions or policies of any employer, partner, or service to continue to be affiliated with them."
Raven: "Although I do not agree with the decisions that have been made by Blizzard [...] will look to continue to work with them in future."
Darroch: "hope that anyone reading can understand that I can disagree with their choices and still be affiliated with them."
I get that each of them would take care with preparing a public message. Who wouldn't. However, when they end up sounding so similar that they're effectively identical beat for beat, it makes it seem less sincere and more like a prepared politically correct statement that Blizzard PR guided them to make.
The contrast is even more stark when you compare the similarity of these statements to how different the statements are of other people that are more assertive with their condemnation of Blizzards actions i.e. Kibler, Admirable, Amnesiac etc. They don't sound anywhere near as cookie cutter.
Blizzard is obviously operating by a PR&legal playbook. You see the same kinds of common themes in the statement by Blizzard's president and Blitzchung.
I wouldn't be surprised if some sort of (re)negotion took place and these statements by the casters (written by blizzard) are part of the deal. I don't think they really care about how transparent this all is to gamers, if you ask me the main audience for these statements is the investors.
I might be alone with this opinion but I think politics should not be part of hearthstone at all. The statement from blitzchung was wrong and a punishment was correct. He abused a game to phrase a political opinion. The punishment was way to strong, that’s true.
This opens the door for other statements. What had happened if he would have said „USA, stop killing us with drones“ or „free the Mexican child’s at the border of USA“. These are massive violation against human rights as well. In this case I am sure that most would have said that the reaction of blizzard would have been correct.
Games should never be a platform for politics. Even if a country is at war with each other, games like hearthstone should be something to UNITE people with sharing a passion. Thatsadmirable reaches longterm the opposite: games like hearthstone to be used as an idiological platform. In conclusion people and countries who dont share the values wont play it anymore. That’s in my opinion the wrong way.
You are not alone. I agree with you too.
I agree with you. Do you think if somebody would express opinions you mention you expect them to get same harsh punishment? I think not. I think that by issuing such a harsh punishment for first time offender blizzard acted politically. I think admirable statement is not too good. But Brian's is. Very detailed and to the point. You don't have to agree of the issue at hand, but you have to see that blizzard acted inappropriatly for the situation
Sottle and any other broadcaster that continues to work for blizzard are just as bad as blizzard. They fired two broadcasters for being there. Your jobs mean nothing to them. Way to sell your soul for a few bucks now.
They may not support Blizzards desicion, as they have said. But they may need the job and it can be difficult to find a new job at the the spot. As Kibler said, we can't expect the other casters to do the same as him, because they may not have so much to fall back on in a financial standpoint. (Sorry for bad english)
I have a feeling the AU team was going to leave the tournament regardless of Blizzard's reaction... the fact that Blizzard did nothing highlights the fact blitzchung's region was integral to his punishment. I hope this controversy continues to receive the exposure it's getting now (and more) to bring attention to Hong Kong's plight.
Didn't love Admirable before, but I certainly have more respect for him now. I honestly can't see how the other casters are doing the mental gymnastics required to say "This thing is bad. And what my employer did was really wrong, but I'm staying anyway". I seriously hope that they don't try to portray it as a principled stance later.
While I continue to have hope that Blizzard will come to its senses, I would at this point call it a fool's hope. And I suspect I'll be removing Hearthstone from more than just my phone in the next day or two. No point leaving it installed if they're not changing their minds.
I am SHOCKED that Blizzard's plan of "keep pretending this hasn't happened" isn't working for them....
Americans love our freedom of speech. You want to stir the hornets nest? Tell us we can’t say something. Proud of those kids for this, they have a lot to lose by essentially giving up a future in gaming and the industry to help support others
Americans seem to say that they love their freedom of speech a lot but then someone expresses that freedom of speech by kneeling during the anthem at a football game, some of you Americans seem not to love free speech as much.
Not all, maybe not even a majority but I wouldn't be so openly proud of American's love of free speech when you as a nation seemingly only love it when it's convenient.
Not a majority at all. I try not to judge people by the incredibly loud and obnoxious vocal minority
You can't say N-word.
*Shots fired*
Nads
Raven released a statement too: https://twitter.com/RavenCasts/status/1182485471760248832?s=19
...and now Darroch: https://twitter.com/DarrochBrown/status/1182522877750460416?s=19